You don't seem like the kind of person who can realize a mistake anyway because even after receiving warnings from DT members. You still continued requesting for no collateral loans, if it was a genuine mistake. You would have stopped the habit immediately, but you didn't. You deleted some of the posts, but all the archives are here - https://loyce.club/archive/members/352/3523584.html

Your aim here is to just scam members anyway, so your presence in the forum is of no value. I don't think we shall miss you.

The moment he received the first of his tags he must have known that his account could not be used for asking for loans or for joining signature campaigns yet he still posts using it when it serves no purpose. I am fairly certain the OP is not as gullible as he might be giving the impression and I would not be surprised if he already has other accounts.

Explained right above your post.

---

Now I am honestly confused.

On previous post, I can get the hint of satiric response, though I prefer to take it literally due to the possibility that if we amuse the idea to an OP that seemingly very gullible, not clarified and straightened, it poses a risk to cast a wrong impression to the DT system, that he'll led to think that DT and their feedback can be exchanged for some amount of fund; not necessarily 1.3BTC, if OP took this idea and believe it's true, he'll probably "negotiate" a lower number, or leave immediately with an assumption that DT can really be bought. In other word: read the room before you throw the sarcastic retort, mull over how possible is it for gullibles to take your word literally.

And here you're saying that you think for it a for a few times and insist that though it's originally intended to be a sarcastic retort, it still has a point. Thus, you're now being sincere with the suggestion, because with 4 negative feedback, there is no other way for OP [due to the three points you raised, though I'd like to argue that point number 3 is actually still a possible path to take] to get it removed other than paying?

Your words, and if you argue and try to get away with it by saying that you're still being sarcastic, maybe because the implication of what you suggested finally dawned to you, the wording you made, "It's a sarcasm, but after I think it for few times, actually it still has a point" points to a possibility that you believe the idea you offered actually have a merit, further stressed with the closing words that you ask "how", how can OP exactly get his negative feedback removed, other than with the method you suggested.

This is where I circled back to the part where point number 3 is still a possible path. If OP contributes to the forum, it doesn't close to a possibility that the negative feedback will eventually be removed as people begin to trust him. Catching scammers or abusers hint that his post will be made on scam accusations board, the one that runs on evidences. If he can provide undeniable evidence, would you think readers and the DT judge that he isn't genuine?

Another one, as suggested by other, which if I may be honest, I am not really favoring it: create a whole new account. Start fresh, his account basically has nothing to lose, it can be disposed and he can create a new one with more understanding of what he should and should not say, what's the acceptable terms in lending section, and what's frowned by the forum. It's certainly way better than suggesting to pay the DT, an idea that come from your sarcasm and you find rather valid after thinking about it for a few times.

I'll suggest you to drop this topic before you go further down the rabbit hole.

---

It came to my mind, as I previously stated, but I can't help but also consider the possible scenario that occur due to the post, which also explained on previous post. And I choose to take the risk of an err, giving it a chance to be clarified, rather than let OP believe DT can be bought.

In retrospect, though, I think the best approach will be to write, "OP, in case you missed it, that suggestion is a sarcasm."

Looking to buy any wallets people are not using. Minimum 100 transactions per wallet in the past 2+ months preferred. Looking to pay $10 per wallet. If you have a wallet now that's old I'm paying you to move ur assets into another wallet and sell me ur old one, thats all. New here so idk how to do escrow but I will pay for escrow when I figure it out.

Did you honestly think anyone here in their right mind would loan you 30BTC, which was worth about $1.5 million dollars at the time of posting?

These are the kind of deals for which you need armed couriers, body guards, weapons, etc in person to make sure that you don't get kidnapped or robbed along with everything else in your possession. Why would you expect some strangers on the internet to give you a million dollars without collateral?

Their silly comments are no worse than your silly request. Not a single person on the forum is going to hand you $45000 without some sort of actual worthy collateral. An NFT collection likely not worth even 1% is not worthy collateral.

If people are in the business of giving money away, i'll take 1.3 btc as well lmao.

1.3 BTC the greed is real

Do you have a collateral?
No one cares why you need it. Only need the security so that you are paying back.

Evidently the o.p.'s scalping business is an abject failure judging by the lack of sales in their other threads.