The API implementation is ready? 

The Clearnet version loads quite well, the .Onion is a little slower at first. The site definitely shows a lot of improvement now, great work.

Hello, what is the Time of return of the XMR bridge advanced mode? thanks

It seems like a very good idea.

Can the two modes Coinjoin and Advanced be implemented through the API? Will it be possible to create a website and implement both modes with the API?


Any estimate of when it will be available? in a few months maybe?

Hello, if I verify a telegram account with a number, can that number be used by another user? And if he decides to do the same as me, in that case would there be a problem with the telegram account? Would it work for a few months or would the telegram number have to be changed often so that this doesn't happen? Or do you discard the numbers once used? Thanks

You have good prices on your linux VPS. It's great that you directly accept XMR. Surely I will try your service soon. As an idea for the future, it would be great if you had an option outside the EU or USA, combined with the XMR payment method it would be very interesting That said I will really try it.

Hello i like your mixer, nice work.
Can the letter of guarantee be sent to the bot? the file or how it works? Thank you

Ok And that's how this mixer works and all the ones I named above, don't try to confuse users. What bothers you is coins with dark history being removed. I don't think you are interested in mixing bitcoins, I think you are interested in farming post like the previous user. You are also trying to confuse the users and it seems very serious to me that you are trying to make them believe that it is a technical or privacy problem when in reality it is your personal matter.


Now I have to say that it is true that you are lying and it is beginning to be repetitive. You don't know what the source of this mixer's coins is, and you don't know how the Scoring system you mention works, you just have a slight idea and are making assumptions. I think you have felt bad that your list is known to be impartial and that you omit to include other services that you know well and use this same system for years.

You confuse morality with a security or privacy issue. If you don't like something, don't use it, but don't tell others it's a problem just because you don't like it.

By the way I don't see any of the mixers mentioned yet in your list. Do you have time to spam here but I understand that making your list truthful is secondary to you. And I sincerely believe that you are already spamming this thread. Although after seeing your history of comments I see that it is something you do normally.

I have to break a lance in favor of these guys since I see your interventions in this thread a bit unfair. They didn't ignore your post, as I see they replied to you and the user n0nce, who refer to the same thread that he owns. So I assume you both have similar personal interests. The scoring system will seem bad to you, but not to other users, since you deliver any bitcoin from any source and in exchange you receive a clean one with which you will not have problems anywhere. I understand that this bothers you, but it is not fooling anyone as you try to make it appear.

Here it is blatantly noticeable that it is you who is trying to confuse users about the service. Users receive clean bitcoins with no Dark history, which is what the users want. That is not aligned with your way of thinking. I understand that this is what bothers you, but it is not something negative in my opinion, quite the opposite.

After reviewing this list and its comments, I have to say it seems very strange to me that this is the first mixer that you include. Missing from that list are many services that uses the same system.

And the most important thing is that I think you tries to make everyone believe that selecting coins is bad for users security and it is not true.

The answers they have given to all users seem correct to me, they have been informative and polite throughout, Except for the comments of user n0nce who blatantly has a strange and intriguing interest in this thread. and I have to say that reading the answer he has given you has been fun and not annoying.

Also, I see that you repeat the same thing over and over again in your post, although they have already answered you regarding how it works. What inclines me to think that you have a hidden interest in harming this particular service.
I see that you are a legendary member, I understand that post farming is something natural in you.

I could not omit the fact that both you and the user n0nce participate in marketing campaigns for other services similar to this one, it can be seen in your signatures. And right now, you have the same advertising active in your firm. I want to say that you are users who are paid to make positive reviews and I suppose also negative ones, that would solve why there is no mixer except this one on your list.

As I have been able to read on their website, they don't do the mix process on their server, its a plus point, since these data will not be available to any third party.

Well, there are no mixers that don't use Cloudflare or a third-party service like Incapsula, Cloudbric or DDOS-GUARD... In other words, any provider has access to the data that you mention.

Many mixers, "almost all" have been using cloudflare for years, and the others use third-party services such as DDOS-GUARD, which amounts to the same thing, since they perform the same function. In that case there would be no solution for what you propose.

As for Cloudflare, it has strict policies on the privacy of its users. In general, Cloudflare affirms that it respects the privacy of user data and does not sell or share personal information with third parties, and has demonstrated this on many occasions, including in media cases.

However, it is important to note that no online service can guarantee absolute data security, and this applies to cloudflare, Incapsula as well as Cloudbric or DDOS-GUARD. All of them must follow the applicable laws and regulations in the jurisdictions where they operate. In this case, the user is the one who decides what to do and what extra measures to take when using these services, which are all the same in my opinion.

Hey. The link is wrong:

http://HTTPS://RACCOIN.CO

you should modify it

Why is the Telegram bot not a very privacy-respecting practice? 

I think it has been a terrible mistake to use Google Analytics and Search console in a BTC mixer, that is the same as monitoring your web traffic, somehow you have extracted data from your users.

Precise mode doesn't work on Tor (with java disabled) because you've done that part with JavaScript, you can hide and show those fields with pure CSS. I see a lot of useless script in your code, it looks like jambler api copy/paste, you should rethink, remove them from the Tor version or at least offer a version without JavaScript.

Precise mode fail on Tor Screenshot:

The strange thing is that you use JS to show and hide fields and for navigation on clear and Tor version, which is totally unnecessary because you can do it with CSS, and then there are scripts in your code that are supposedly useless. It's like you want the user to enable java for no reason, which may seem suspicious to some users. It doesn't make sense, I recommend you change it.

What I like the most about your mixer is the Clean (No-JS) version. It allows me to use it on Tor with Java totally disabled. I've been quite surprised because very few Mixers take the time to do things right. Which goes to show that it's just a matter of taking the time to create those parts with pure CSS and no Java.