-

A bet with an untrustworthy user here can work only via escrow. If you're not willing to send the bet amount to an escrow then even your bet offer is scammy AF, because there is no way for me to make you pay if I win. Add to that your incessant edits and it's clear that you're just blowing smoke here.


Again, my feedback was posted for the reasons stated in the feedback itself. I didn't claim that you don't have BTC. Nor does having BTC make you trustworthy. So no, a signed message would not result in removal of the feedback, don't bother.

So you can sign a message but you need a loan? Makes no sense.

If you insist on a bet, send 0.1 BTC to LoyceV for escrow (if he agrees to this nonsense) and a signed message showing your BTC stash and I'll do the same. I don't need to know how much you have, escrow can adjudicate this. I don't see what this proves though. Surely doesn't prove you're trustworthy.

Unfortunately I only take bitcoins for bets and you don't have any so I doubt that's going to work.


You're untrustworthy for the reasons stated in my trust feedback. No amount of twisting is going to help you here so you can save your fingers and stop typing this belligerent nonsense.

Collateral scams aren't a new thing, I've seen it many times.

Either way, you ticked all the bad boxes asking this. If you have Dogecoin or BCH, use an instant exchanger. That's even cheaper than paying 0.0004BTC interest, so your request doesn't make any sense.

You said you will never ask for a loan (didn't specify collateral or not, just any loan). They you asked for a loan. That makes you untrustworthy. I'm not going to provide you with instructions how to scam on a collateral loan, but there are other issues with such loans as well, not the least of which is trust farming leading to a long con.


Good luck with that. Maybe try actually having money so that you don't need to borrow yourself.

Oh, watch out we got a "thinker" here LOL

Jesus fucking Christ, even scammers got stupider while I was out.

Is there anyone who reads Swedish but can't read English? For the same reason, I never bothered translating this into Dutch.

Click quote, the remove the first and last line.

What is truly sad is that both of you little bitches are complaining about the neutral feedback on your profiles, while at the same time, you are leaving retaliatory feedback and thus abusing the trust system yourselves.

Don't talk the talk, if you can't walk the walk.   |   CYBER_COWBOY   |

So if my Trust feedbacks are correct

Yep - did that weeks months ago.  I now have ~390 trust feedback down from the previous ~3,050 - so which one is wrong?

Why is it a new address

Hhampuz is the campaign manager, and his feedback is related to his position and current relationship with the service provider. I do not see his action as a vindicating scam. Moreover, if I'm not mistaken, Hhampuz has, on more than one occasion, refused to cooperate with services that looked suspicious or had negative sentiment from a number of prominent members or the wider forum community. He even went as far as repeatedly paying campaign participants out of his own pocket when the project owners turned to the dark side.

Hence, accusing him of siding with scams is completely unfounded, as he has demonstrated time and again that he values his reputation above the money he earns from campaigning on a weekly basis.

As for this particular case and the accusation that Stakemeharder made against Rollbit casino, I really can't pass my judgment because, as LoyceV noted, the whole case is kind of messy, and we have bits and pieces of information shared across multiple posts, so it's challenging to form a conclusive opinion. Based on the few screenshots I've seen, there does appear to be some unusual betting activity, as risking thousands of dollars at 1.003 or 1.008 odds doesn't seem to make much sense unless it's a way to take advantage of rakeback. Now, whether this alone justifies banning a user and confiscating their balance, I cannot say, and there might be additional reasons that the casino is not disclosing.

My only suggestion is that Stakemeharder should try to present the case as clearly and transparently as possible, and also seek stronger community support or the opinion of a third-party mediator.

---

@CYBER_COWBOY, I understand that everyone is entitled to their opinion, but your comments are just plain nonsense. You contradict yourself in half of what you're saying.