This truly sucks, and highlights the major problem with the Apple ecosystem.

Whats your plan for BTC Express? Will we see updates on git-hub for those who run it jailbroken?

Do you have any other options for getting it in the app store?

Are you using json-rpc calls to talk with the server? and if so can it talk with a remote bitcoind?

If this is the case it would be perfect for my iPhone, since I already have an json-rpc interface for WalletBit for it to interface with!

Kind regards
Kris

I like the ideas behind the client, and I hope this app gets certified.

But please, PLEASE, fix the hideous UI. Those backgrounds have to go, at the very least because they make the icon text hard to read. The color scheme looks dirty and sickly. iOS apps typically don't have Springboard-style layouts, i.e. a "home screen" and several icons to click, they have one visible screen that can be switched to different tabs (facebook is a notable exception to this).

These are just off the top of my head. I'm sure others could supply more suggestions.

But, again, good luck. I wish you the very best with this project.

I installed the app and now i'll review it

the app itself is awesome! pay with btc from my iphone is great!

this is the test I made to see if it works fine:
1. sent 0.01 BTC from my windows client to my iphone
2. the 0.01 were received after the 1st confirmation
3. i'm trying to send the 0.01 BTC back to my client but i cant

The first problem is when i'm typing the amount of BTC, I don't have the dot . as decimal separator because in my country we use , as decimal separator. Using , the app tells me the amount is invalid.

The second problem is after the correct amount is input in the field (0.01), i cant send back the payment because it says Insufficient funds. My iphone account balance is 0.01 by checking Balance section.

I get something different when i input 0.0090 as amount. i get: "Error: this transaction requires a tx fee of at least 0.0005 and a relay fee of 0.001, because of its amount, complexity....."

I can only send the funds when i set the amount as 0.0085.

Why am I paying two fees? What is the relay fee?

Suggestion: When sending funds, if I set the amount to send and that amount is the total BTC I have in iphone wallet, it should accept my 0.01 as input and deduct the fees after sending. People dont want to be testing values like myself. I input 0.01 and got error, then input 0.0095 and same error, then 0.009 and different error, and finally 0.0085 and it was accepted. The app itself should calculate the fees at the end and whe dont have to be testing amounts

I know how it works, and no, my private data is not entirely known by everyone because you can't know a priori which are all my address. You can't even know whether two particular addresses belong to the same person or not.
In a client server solution like yours, the server can link together all the address of one client wallet. Okay, if it doesn't ask anything more, it will only know the IP of the owner, not his identity. But it adds some risk anyway.
I know it's not a major problem, mainly because people should not put all their wealth in a smartphone, but I'd suggest you not to keep any logs in your server that could link together different addresses, just for precaution. If you keep such logs and they leak, that could be bad, since anyone that has ever done one single transaction with one of your clients could then know every other transaction that this client ever did using your app.

Brilliant way to reduce processing power down to iOS level. Is your "edit" of the UI open-source as well? 

Congratulations for your great work!

You say no private data is sent to the server. How can it be? I mean, the client must at least ask the server how much money it has on its addresses, what means the server will know which are your addresses, thus it will know how much money you've got on your wallet and how you spend them. Your "private data" is entirely known by the server.

Or by "private data" you meant only the private keys to the addresses? If that's the case, maybe you should correct your statement to make it clearer?

Thanks.

fingster may have to correct me, but it looks like it does download blocks.  However, instead of retaining the full block database like the normal client, it retains only the wallet database, including transactions on associated addresses, and discards everything else.

Edit: Never mind, I don't have a clue.  So what's "txwithtime" ?

It's an impressive reduction of the Satoshi client by any measure.