|
I just want to verify - to run a masternode all you need is the new wallet with 500k coins? Nothing else to it, except keep it running (or is that optional too)?
|
|
|
|
|
They are too busy spending their ICO money to communicate and fix the site.
|
|
|
|
This looks promising at a glance. I will be following this closely this project  A dead forum, I don't know how it looks promising... |
|
|
|
R.I.P. Etherdelta. First we had that hacker attack, now we have all these technical problems. Hopefully other decentralized exchanges will learn from all this and will take its place on the market.
I don't know why etherdelta is always facing the same problems, even after their ICO they are not improving the standards. In order to get reputable one should always focus on development so that user base will start increasing. IIRC, per the roadmap from the ICO, they won't be making any improvements until Q2. That includes basic functionality evidently. Can't wait to see how they handle transitioning to the new Etherdelta smart contract, lol. |
|
|
|
Reggie Youtube update: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CndMwfdgml8Notes to follow on edits. 1. Reviewed new hires, Andrew 2. VEADIR now allows users to control assets through the entire process, because their assets are controlled in their own smart contract, not a large combined smart contract. 3. You can take delivery of VEADIR assets or ETH equivalent. 4. Code/Security audit to start Monday 5. New VEADIR beta available monday |
|
|
|
|
I guess this project is officially dead.
|
|
|
|
For the last 2 days I have been trying to register a new account at https://game.footballcoin.io/signup and every time I get: Register user
Network communication error, please try again laterWhat am I doing wrong? My Internet is fine. |
|
|
|
|
What's the deal with WGR on Yobit? I tried to withdraw from there but it got cancelled...
|
|
|
|
News has surfaced of a new NEO-based ICO called Aphelion which aims to build the first trading platform for the NEO blockchain.
You don't say? |
|
|
|
Welcome to crypto!
No one has ever made a dime in crypto by collecting "dividends"...
One way or another, ALL money in made by trading coin pumps and selling near tops.
Good luck in all your future endeavors!
Not true. ASTRO token paid out some pretty nice dividends for Q4 2017. |
|
|
|
An excellent article on Populous: https://blog.goodaudience.com/populous-onward-db8d891918a3As anyone who has been in software knows, it takes time. If the product is not forthcoming exactly to plan, people degrade, question, and try to instill fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) into others. Remember, in crypto you are discredited until proven otherwise. You don’t see knowledgeable people asking about Google’s AI program delays or complaining that Uber/GM/Tesla have failed since self driving cars are not blanketing the roadways. What you do find are those knowing very little about something yelling the loudest about any altered ‘planned trajectory’. OK — who’re we kidding — software is almost always delayed.
Even to this day, Apple, almost universally recognized as a top tech company, still has delays. Most notably their shipment of the iPhone X and HomePod. |
|
|
|
hey!, where bagging populous here. Ill go bag hive in their own forum.
So.... ive had a look and as expected it was the late then uncompleted beta which has killed this coin.
NOT FUDSTERS.
Just letting the kids at home know, a beta release should be fully working and operational with just bugs to iron out. OPerational meaning can accept invoices, can credit risk score, can be factored.
I feel that if they don't release final proper beta this month this coin is done for , maybe people hold on a bit longer mid marchish maybe not.
you guys only have a few days to make this happen. This coin will get dumped to nothing. Sorry, it is not do or die. Nico has shown steady progress and improvement. The last 5% of a project is the hardest and he can't release it until it's perfect. He screwed up in calling the last release and before a Beta. It was a demo at best. A delay won't kill PPT off permanently as you suggest. Most PPT holders have patience as long as we see and hear progress. Further to this and i got to admit i dont fully understand it, but have read the white paper. I understand you put in your ppt which is exchaged for pokens to the invoice buyer. Then I believe the invoice buyer can exchange pokens to fiat.
What happens if i as PPT holder Factor to myself. So I can hold the fiat. If the price of PPT goes up I can exchange the fiat back to myself with profits and cop the fee from populous. HOWEVER, if the price of PPT goes down . I can not exchange the tokens take the money and purchase more PPT at a cheaper price and populous are on hook for the contract which i just delfault on. As the invoice buyer obviously your not going to kick up a fuss as you gained yourself. This is all given that no invoices are checked at populous. This is too simple and im sure they have a solution but I didn't read about it in the whitepaper thats all.
Maybe you shouldn't bag on something you don't understand. It's likely that PPT will investigate all defaults to identify such abuses as you described and take appropriate action. |
|
|
|
OK, who cares? When Hive's platform comes out in 4 months, the question of who wrote the whitepaper won't mean crap. I'm not sure it means anything now either. If you want to get on your moral high horse or you simply refuse to be a part of a business that "stole" a whitepaper, that's your choice. Just like you can choose to be a part of PPT that has a CEO with a criminal past. How you feel doesn't mean that the Hive project/company isn't viable and isn't going to make people a lot of money. If your morals prevent you from having any part of it, that's understandable, you can just watch everyone else get rich off of Hive. If you're predicting doom based on the 'stolen whitepaper' allegation, I suggest you deepen your investigation a little because Hive has managed to make significant progress no matter who wrote their whitepaper. |
|
|
|
|
I checked out the beta. I can see now why PPT missed their deadlines. I can spot code done by Indians a mile away. If the PPT executive team doesn't have experience working with Indian devs, they find out the hard way that you have to expect that their definition of 'done' isn't the standard of what most people expect for a polished product. They also tend to be dishonest about reporting issues and progress. I can easily see how this happened. Unfortunately it is a tough lesson to learn - you get what you pay for.
|
|
|
|
Its funny to read this last 10 pages.
I just got confirmation that i made correct decision investing in Hive rather than PPT.
They are already 2 steps in front of PPT.
Real partnership, demo version, big exchange coming until end of Q1, great team,
great comunity manager,..
Not sure how you can say this. PPT should go live with invoice purchases before the end of the month. HVN still months away. Don't get me wrong, I think HVN is a good project and extremely undervalued at the moment, but it will be months before they are selling invoices. EDIT: I don't know why there is animosity between HVN and PPT and even PPP. Initially they will all be serving different geographic areas and the market is plenty big for everyone. |
|
|
|
Highlights that I remember: 1. Lots of new hiring 2. Revised PPT report available soon, PPP report available soon. 3. VEADIR public beta still waiting on regulatory review/approval 4. Verbal agreement from 3 African exchanges, waiting on Reggie to sign contracts or MOUs. 5. VEADIR will now allow participants to end their exposures early and take delivery either in ETH or in tokens. Note: It's unclear to me how this will work with "veritized" real-world assets (other than ERC20 tokens). |
|
|
|
|
We have an opening for a small blockchain development project and can start right away. Our forte is ETH smart contracts but we are anxious to work other blockchains. Looking for a project that will take few days to a few months for 1 or 2 devs. We also have a data analytics expert if your project needs that.
We can do ICOs with security audit starting around $10k depending on complexity.
|
|
|
|
This just reminds me about BitConnect case. Many were yelling that it was scam and many other were defending. At the end...
You know how it ends.
Reminds me of the Veritaseum FUD. Many were screaming it was a scam and vaporware and many were defending. And now they have a functioning beta. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
