6%? Greedy! That's why I never use Gminer.

Mined 8 hours at 165MH, on baikal and earned just 0.19 meta. Pure crap.

Also 11 hours in solo mode with 690MH, earned 0 meta (no even one single block found).

Or maybe baikal pool is crap. Wasted time.

Maybe the last option is bios update. Try it, just with integrated graphic video. Also, try to use better CPU, maybe Celeron is too weak.

Hi, try to use bigger SSD (256GB) and increase virtual memory at least as sum of entire quantity of  memory of all video cards used. By example if you have 10 cards of 16 GB video memory each, virtual memory must be at least 160GB. Also, update motherboad bios to the latest version available on producer website. Try to leave CSM on, too, with less UEFI and more legacy.Good luck!

It worked?

Try               zil-eu.crazypool.org:5005

Ok, any other opinions, of other users wich mine zilliqa too?

Hi, I have observed in the last period, Zilliqa is lowered on reward and also harder to find shares when mining.
Until couple days since I have observed this, I was mining it on Ezil pool (dual mining), and everything was ok.
Usually I earned around 50 Zil on 24-27 hours with around 950MH real hashrate on rigs.
Then it lowered more than half of initial earnings.
Read about Ezil pool is closing on March and moved back to Crazypool, but here also poor earnings, compairing tho the past year when I used for couple weeks, crazypool.
There are entire rounds with 0 shares made, even if in pool it shows 1+ GH in hashrate (rigs are showed correctly in pool but achieve 0 shares on that round).
I use the same settings as in the past for both pools and rigs too.
Anyone, any ideea what's happening?
Thank's!

RTX3080 Full Hash Rate.

So, this project can be revived?

Or is dead and burried?

Wich are the last "old news" about it?

Lost one day with 6 graphic cards, just to earn 1,2 coin.
Wasted time.

Yes, that's correct, Rigel has always better results than every other Nvidia miner, because lower fee, and maybe more realistic hashrates showed when mining.

But since last version, it was impossible to use for nicehash.



Tested in last day, 8 hours Rigel vs 8 hours Gminer, 4 rounds of nicehash payments, meaning 2 rounds of 4 hours each for Rigel and 2 rounds of 4 hours each for Gminer, compairing achievement into account, Rigel mined did 0.00002117 + 0.00002049 BTC, versus Gminer that did 0.00002189 + 0.00002163 BTC, even if Rigel have 1% fee vs Gminer wich takes 3% fee, both in same case, dual mining Kawpow+ZIL, same OC settings.

But I think 24 hours of each miner, will be more relevant, that's follow my next test.

With absolute the same settings as before, I got this error:




Also pool hashrate is too small, even acceptes shares is small too (26 accepted shares after 7 minutes of mining), compairing to Gminer wich does 41 accepted shares after same 7 minutes of mining;



So?

Yes, I used From 1.13.0 onwards "-a kawpow+zil" is preferred over "-a ravencoin+zil". as seen in first settings on my post.

Waiting for new release to test it.
Good luck and keep ON the good work!

Hi.

Is there any command or option for rigel miner to restart iself in continuous loop, let's say after 1 minute of mining?

Hello everyone. I had observed zilliqa mining is not working since around 6 hours ago. 0 hashes on miner, rigel, or gminer, also pools are not found any blocks since 6 hours ago. Even wallet shows 0 coins.  Anyone knows what's happening? Thanks.

EDIT, this post can be deleted:

It was internal trouble, quoted from TW:


Hello everyone,

Thank you for your understanding and patience.

We are pleased to inform you that the network is now fully operational. In due course, we'll provide more information on the issue we encountered.

As always we appreciate your continued support during these challenging moments! 🙏

Regards,
The Zilliqa Team
12:00 AM · Dec 19, 2023

It was possible that issue was from the pool, now rejected are less.
Keep up the good work!
Cheers!

When that happened? And how it was solved? Or, it was solved?

Hi, since 1.9.0 version, including 1.9.1 too, it started to appear more rejected shares on ZIL coin in dual or single mining, more than 10-15% are rejected shares regarding older versions, where rejected shares of ZIL, was lighter 2-3%.

Can you check?

Thank you!

I can go more as it is but im satisfied for GDDR6X freq.On that printscreen, I mine Conflux +ZIL, both needed as higher as I can on memory freq.
If I go at +2200MHz, ZIL goes +110MH and CFX more than 106MH, but a little unstable after couple hours.
I prefear stability and nice hashrate.
Thank's again to the developer for this version wich supports CFX!