I think it's not necessarily a scam, but rather a matter of right or wrong. If you're right, you make a profit, and if you're wrong, you have to accept the loss. I still find NFTs to be somewhat nonsensical, their value can be seen as speculative and exaggerated, and many famous people have incurred losses due to NFTs, like Justin, who lost over a million dollars.

Low market capitalization projects are always the top choice for small-scale investors compared to high market capitalization projects, as the latter may seem less secure. High market capitalization projects are suitable for the majority of investors with larger capital. Sometimes, we have to accept some level of risk if we want to maximize profits.

I agree with you that the article needs to be in line with the forum's guidelines. Perhaps he hasn't read the forum rules. I'd like to add that if you say tokenizing real-world assets is not revolutionary, then how do you define a revolutionary project? Do you think it's one that garners a lot of attention and sees a skyrocketing value for its tokens?

And you should remember that all trends in the market are created and hyped by market makers. The NFT trend of 2020-2021 and the NFT projects that followed had years of work put into them. Okay, anything can happen, as long as there's an opportunity, real-world asset tokenization projects can experience exponential growth when large funds and celebrities get involved.