Bitcoin Forum
June 14, 2024, 04:42:16 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Who was Satoshi Nakamoto? on: March 07, 2024, 11:11:54 PM
Satoshi Nakamoto was most likely the physicist and defender of human rights: Valery Chalidze (1938-2018)

Powerful clues: his 2000 book --> Entropy Demystified: Potential Order, Life and Money // especially chapter 11.

The book is no longer available in paper format, but is available on waybackmachine as a pdf. I don't know if I can put the link here so search for "Valery Chalidze twitter", you'll find on X a compilation of his work and the link to the book.

Satoshi Nakamoto was not a computer scientist by trade in my opinion but a physicist, like Isaac Newton. I invite you to watch Jack Miller's latest video, which corroborates this thesis.
2  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Satoshi’s Memoir Part 1 on: January 03, 2024, 04:18:36 PM
It's really well done, the author seems to know quite a few elements of Satoshi culture, like certain expressions and three purely British words. But you forgot, for example, that Satoshi never wrote "email" but "e-mail", like this: https://web.archive.org/web/20000817014127/http://www.chalidze.com/

https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/288/
https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/bitcoin-list/28/
https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/cryptography/18/

On the other hand, here is the summary he makes of version 0.3 to understand what seems important to him in Bitcoin:

---
https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/bitcoin-list/30/#selection-9.1-65.12
---
bitcoin-list] Bitcoin 0.3 released!
2010-07-06 21:53:53 UTC - Original Email - View in Thread

Announcing version 0.3 of Bitcoin, the P2P cryptocurrency! Bitcoin is a
digital currency using cryptography and a distributed network to replace
the need for a trusted central server. Escape the arbitrary inflation
risk of centrally managed currencies! Bitcoin's total circulation is
limited to 21 million coins.
The coins are gradually released to the
network's nodes based on the CPU power they contribute, so you can get a
share of them by contributing your idle CPU time.

What's new:
- Command line and JSON-RPC control
- Includes a daemon version without GUI
- Transaction filter tabs
- 20% faster hashing
- Hashmeter performance display
- Mac OS X version (thanks to Laszlo)
- German, Dutch and Italian translations (thanks to DataWraith, Xunie
and Joozero)

Get it at http://www.bitcoin.org, and read the forum to find out more.
---

Entropy Demystified: Potential Order, Life and Money (2000 - read this ******* book please)
//
Creating Money (p.181)

The drive to produce whatever has more liquidity is understandable. If a certain commodity plays the role of money then the desire to produce that commodity directly does not surprise us. We also can expect governments openly or secretly to print money when they are short of it. But society also came out with a way to create money without producing anything physically.
As a useful economic practice it was probably discovered in the middle ages somewhere in Europe by some dishonest jeweler who abused the trust of those people who were giving him gold for safekeeping. Instead of safekeeping it, he started to loan that gold to other customers for a fee. Imagine the surprise and anger of some nobleman who gave that jeweler his coins in order not to lose them in gambling, if he would find out that the jeweler himself is gambling with those coins! Still it is exactly what was happening and the calculation of such a jeweler for most of the cases was correct: there is quite a low probability that one day all the depositors will come and demand all their money. Still, the word “dishonest” Iused to characterize such practice was appropriate as there was no FDIC insurance at that time and there was no real guarantee of safety for such a use of someone else’s money. We know about many bank failures throughout history so the people’s trust was actually abused.
It took extensive economic thinking to understand that what such jewelers were doing at the dawn of European capitalism was actually creating money without the royal privilege to mint. The same creative technique is in use now with symbolic paper money which we deposit in the bank. Theoretically, the exact form of money doesn’t matter, such creation of money could be done even if cattle played the role of money although this technique will not actually increase the physical quantity of cattle. In our time in addition to the traditional use of money deposited in the bank, there are also a variety of newly invented financial instruments which are used to create money. Even a simple contract with the promise to pay in the future does, to some extent, create money as the party in the contract behaves as if it has that money before it actually receives it.

https://web.archive.org/web/20221004134003/http://www.worksofvalerychalidze.com/uploads/1/0/2/8/102863812/entropy.pdf
3  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Has Bitcoin Deviated from The Vision of Satoshi? on: January 02, 2024, 08:00:02 AM
 Valery Chalidze (physicist and human rights defender) // with his book Entropy Demystified: Potential Order, Life and Money (2000)

You must read this book to understand how Satoshi created Bitcoin by anchoring it in physics, with proof of work. Make copies of this book (PDF) if it is not possible to obtain it. This is the last source I know of. Download it and copy it.

It can only be found on Wayback Machine, I add a description of this book which can be found at the beginning of the book, written by Valery Chalidze himself, who died in 2018. (1938-

---

Entire book - PDF // Entropy Demystified: Potential Order, Life and Money (2000)

https://web.archive.org/web/20221004134003/http://www.worksofvalerychalidze.com/uploads/1/0/2/8/102863812/entropy.pdf

---

About This Book (Valery Chalidze // 2000)

Although the concept of entropy has been under discussion for one and a half centuries, its philosophical depth has still not been properly explored and it is still one of the most complicated and controversial concepts of science. Its application to the study of social processes has started only in recent decades and no doubt this trend will continue. The author’s first goal in this book is to provide those who are interested in social studies, but not familiar with physics, with a comprehensible explanation of the concept of entropy. The value of the knowledge of entropy for the social scientist is at least two-fold:

Entropy is characteristic of a level of disorder in any statistical system and for this reason can be successfully used for the description of the communication process, music or economic activity as well as the behavior of inanimate matter. In this use, one is dealing with the order and disorder of a system independently of physics: entropic characteristics can be used no matter what makes a system orderly or disorderly, be it the laws of mechanics or our manipulations with symbols, like the alphabet letters of musical notes. The example of the use of the entropy concept as a characteristic of any statistical system is the well known Shannon’s Theory of Information which found its application not only in the technology of communications but in biology, linguistics and other areas.

Whenever we are dealing with matter and energy be it heat machines, biology, economy or the use of natural resources, we must take into account the second law of thermodynamics, which states that the level of disorder (entropy) in an enclosed system can not decrease and that one has to spend energy to decrease disorder in any part of the system. The processes of life and social life are characterized by increasing local order, but are still subject to limitation as dictated by the second law of thermodynamics. This brought scientists to the development of the physics of open systems thanks to the ideas of Schrodinger, Prigogine and others. Now we understand that the world is a place where destructive tendencies coexist with creative forces.

For many decades the traditional topic for passionate debate among scientists and moralists has been whether we are masters of our behavior or whether and to what extent we follow biological prescription - instincts. In this book, the author tries to go one step deeper, to the following inquiry: what are the inevitable consequences of the fact that we are built from matter, and how much our willing - together with instinctive - behavior is defined and limited by the laws of physics? Limitations imposed on life, social life, economics and the use of environment by the second law of thermodynamics are particularly interesting.

After an extensive explanation of what entropy is as a measure of disorder, the author shows how entropy can be used as a bulk characteristic to measure order. He introduces the concept of potential order, which characterizes the ability of an open system to become orderly or to create order in another system. Potential order is a property of fields of subatomic particles and atoms which provide for the primary organization of matter. It is also a property of complex molecules within the living cell which provide for the organized behavior of living entities. Further, human will and economic enterprise possess potential order to increase order around us, be it material order or the creation of information.

The author is showing that the second law of thermodynamics is fundamental in putting limitations on certain automatic behavioral patterns of all living creatures - including humans - such as entropy lowering activity and self-isolation from the disorderly matter surrounding us.

The entropic approach permits the author to do further inquiry into the connection between physics and economics. It is well known that the ideas of classical mechanics provided the basis for the development of mathematical economics since the time it was established in the nineteenth century. In recent decades more economists started to realize the limitation of such an approach and started to connect economic thinking with a thermodynamic approach as well as with systems’ theory.

The concept of entropy in relation to economics and sociology was under discussion in the works of Faber, Georgesku-Roegen, and others. More authors started to see the deep analogy of economic development and the behavior of a thermodynamic system. After all, human activity, which is the subject of economic study, is a local entropy lowering process and it is exactly physics which can permit us to see the unavoidable limits of this activity.

The author shows that the low-entropic component of an economy, which is the order producing activity of people, should not be treated in theory the same way as the purely energetic component. On the basis of this, the author shows the limitations for the use of variational calculus in economics, discussing particularly the maximization of utility function.

In his analysis of the monetary measurement of order and potential order, the author shows that some important problems connected with the evaluation of goods produced by economy, inflation and monetary policy come from the fact that the same measuring device—money— is used for both—the purely energetic and low-entropic components of the economy.

// This message could disappear due to censorship //
4  Local / Off-topic (Hrvatski) / VC on: August 12, 2023, 09:42:32 AM
Symmetrization of the "Satoshi" mystery BTC
---------------------

Little anecdote…
It was in high school, I must have been 15, was sitting next to my best friend in physics class.

Professor Boyer had given us an exercise and I was not really the best student, I had even repeated a class in college.

But that day, by the greatest of luck, I seemed to find the result of the problem by using a different method than expected.

Professor Boyer, his eyes plunged into my sheet, looked up at me and said "You'll go far" and continued around the tables.

My best friend asked me how I had done. And I just couldn't answer him. Unaware of the thought process that had brought me to this result.


I now come back to the title of this subject and I will not dwell on the how of the why since I am unable to do so, as with physical exercise. It is above all the unconscious crossing of years of research and cross-information on this subject, organized in an insoluble way for my consciousness.

As an intuition, I propose here a new identity behind the pseudonym "Satoshi Nakamoto". It will be up to the community, if the idea germinates, to explore this and I apologize but it seems my nature.


One name: Valery Chalidze (1938-2018)

A USSR-born physicist, Soviet dissident and human rights activist. His nationality was withdrawn in 1972 following a trip to the USA where he remained until the end of his life.

To get to the point, the potential evidence of his involvement in Bitcoin can be found in his book “Entropy Demystified: Potential Order, Life and Money” released in 2000.

It includes the origin of proof of work and the genesis of the new iteration of human currency: Bitcoin.
The key words revolve around thermodynamics, entropy, order and disorder and information theory, not to mention money of course. The book is exciting in many ways.

You can find the pdf on waybackmachine at:

https://web.archive.org/web/20181101233633/http://www.worksofvalerychalidze.com/uploads/1/0/2/8/102863812/entropy.pdf

I thought long and hard about the implication of the symmetrization of the mystery of "Satoshi" identity.
If it is confirmed by the community that Valery Chalidze is potentially the best entropy-reducing proposition on this issue, I hope that the rest of his work especially in cosmology will potentially be recognized and disseminated as the work, not of a new Einstein. Better, like the Chalidze on XXI century.

https://web.archive.org/web/20181101233226/http://www.worksofvalerychalidze.com/

The information is transmitted.

Ps: Bitcoin is almost 15 years old, I think it's time for the community to know the identity of its father. I also learned at this age why my father had been absent from my birth to my six years, a long trip turned into a stay in prison.
15 years old, maybe the age of a certain maturity.

---------------------
ROMOR
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!