That`s a very nice domain name, great job.

I don`t mind "competitors", actually, competition is great as it helps with spreading the word about the still super young crypto gambling space. The number of affiliate sites on the subject keeps growing day by day BUT the number of sites actually providing useful information (crypto gambling /= "traditional gambling") is very limited still.

Edit: Oh, and of course I would NOT agree with that tagline of yours (Best Comparison)...! Haha, jk

Considering the context of mention of casinos on your platform, I believe you should be approaching those casinos with positive reviews for Marketing proposition as they're enjoying services rendered for free.

Reviews are essential in the life of all products to help them perform or produce  better and more human friendly standard products and prospective users also bank on such reviews before patronising then, if for any reason one product gets a positive review, it should be presented as a service as it'll attract more customers.

Maybe we're yet to evolve into the era where businesses understand that wherever they have their names mentioned for a positive reviews, it's more publicity for such businesses

Hello and Welcome to the forum. I visited your website and found a lot of interesting content, that I have not seen in any other casino review website. I am referring to the learn, menu where I found a link to the crypto wallets for gambling. You have an interesting recommendation list, except for Electrum and Trezor I do not think any other wallets should be used. That is my point of view and you can agree or disagree with it. Overall your casino review website is very good and I hope to see more reviews on it. 

Another crypto gambling review site? Ok! I recognise only a couple of sites in your list which is odd since you excluded most major sites like Stake, Crypto.Games, Bitcasino, Sportsbet.io, Duelbits etc.

Also, the reviews themselves need to be improved by providing more details regarding the site in question.

I checked the site and I find it convenient to see the list of features being listed below each casino platform.  I can easily compare and know the features and bonuses of each casino listed on the site.  I have noticed one casino that was labeled to have no KYC requirement.  I would like to know if this has been verified.  As I checked on that casino's privacy terms, they have a clause on collecting players' identities.  That should be checked because it might bring a bad taste to labeling a casino with no KYC requirement when the casino itself has its terms to collect the players' data if necessary.