Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 09:45:56 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it on: December 26, 2023, 03:40:42 PM
Hello, sorry if this is a dumb question or has already been answered in a place I'm failing to find, I'm wondering if there is there any knowledge (or speculation!) of the methodology which was used in the creation of the transaction?

Many thanks

pseudospace.
2  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Centralization in mining. on: December 13, 2023, 08:32:52 PM
Do you think that a private pool like Foundry will collude with other mining pools for a 51% attack? And which centralized exchange will they attack?

If I'm honest I don' think so. However having such a large % of the network controlled by such a small number of pools fundamentally goes against the principles of a decentralized network.

If you do not make transactions during the attack, then your bitcoins are safe.

Safe from the attack, but (unless you act quickly) not safe from the inevitable market crash that would follow news of Bitcoin undergoing a 51% attack.
3  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Centralization in mining. on: December 12, 2023, 10:23:59 PM
It's interesting to think about. I really doubt anything will change for the better (I imagine the issue will likely worsen over time) unless smaller pools are able to come up with incentives to effectively pull in miners.

This issue isn't just to limited to Bitcoin, I believe Monero has a similar issue with the majority of hashrate tied up in a minority of pools. It's unfortunate to see Bitcoin's decentralization slowly being crushed by these pools.
4  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Centralization in mining. on: December 12, 2023, 05:27:57 PM
Question there is why so many much smaller miners use Antpoo? Frankly, for small miners their payout scale suxs...

Yeah I'm kind of lost on what the appeal is, guessing it's simply a case of people going with the most well known option, without full knowledge of the impact their decision is having on the network. Kind of raises questions about the barrier of entry for mining being too low for those with large amounts of money to spend, but lack fundamental knowledge of how Bitcoin works.
5  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Centralization in mining. on: December 12, 2023, 01:20:09 PM
It would have been good if the hash rate can be more distributed than only two pools having over 51% of mining hash rates.

Absolutely.  Having incentives to move people away from the larger pools would be a very good start. I'm unfamiliar with what the appeal of these 2 pools are which draw such a large number of miners.
6  Other / Off-topic / Re: Dogs or Cats? (Highly off-topic) on: December 12, 2023, 01:02:43 PM
Cats all the way, dogs make too much noise.
7  Bitcoin / Mining / Centralization in mining. on: December 12, 2023, 12:54:44 PM
Apologies if this is a topic which has already been extensively discussed, but does it not disturb anyone that in the last week ~55% of network hashrate has been shared between 2 pools? Maybe my judgement is incorrect but it seems like a disaster just waiting to happen. Is moving towards more asic resistant algorithms something which has been considering or is feesable?

It seems in the last couple of years mining has had a pretty dramatic shift into the hands of larger cooperations and governments.

Are my worries justified?

pseudospace.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!