You are right, the common factor for PVK addresses is not just the difference in PVK values.
I will tell you a mathematical relationship between PVK values that can be easily calculated.
The PVK value of address 5 is 21 because address 4 has a PVK of 8, and address 5 is the next first value after 4. So, 21 = PVK 5 = PVK 4 + 8.
Do you understand? If you still don't understand, I'll give you another example. Suppose we are looking for the PVK value of address 7. We know that the PVK value of address 6 is 49.
We understand that the PVK value of address 7 is = to the nearest prime number after 49. The next prime number after 49 is 61.
So address 7 is at PVK 61.
Now you understand?
I will tell you a mathematical relationship between PVK values that can be easily calculated.
The PVK value of address 5 is 21 because address 4 has a PVK of 8, and address 5 is the next first value after 4. So, 21 = PVK 5 = PVK 4 + 8.
Do you understand? If you still don't understand, I'll give you another example. Suppose we are looking for the PVK value of address 7. We know that the PVK value of address 6 is 49.
We understand that the PVK value of address 7 is = to the nearest prime number after 49. The next prime number after 49 is 61.
So address 7 is at PVK 61.
Now you understand?
Satoshi is too busy doing things about gods to be commenting here on the theories of mere mortals.
What you're telling me is that as if I were saying the following.
Address 2, pvk decimal value: 3
Address 3, pvk decimal value: 7
Address 4, pvk decimal value: 8
Address 5, pvk decimal value: 21
Address 6, pvk decimal value: 49
Address 7, pvk decimal value: 76
Address 8, pvk decimal value: 224
Address 9, pvk decimal value: 467
Address 10, pvk decimal value: 514
9 and 10 =467
because 9*10 = (90 + (224 + 76 + 49 + 21 + 8 )) - 1= 467
What I did was create a mathematical pattern, conveniently to get the value I want, but this is just an illusion.
Therefore, I don't see much sense in your explanation.
I'm not one to judge, but in science we speak with evidence.
You have used an interesting progression but in reality if you look at the value of direction 7 you determine it from another progression.
What I have explained to you is the thought process to solve the progression that is equal to the PVK values of that address.
It's a similar process to the one you use to calculate address 7, but here you need to take another mathematical progression into account. You are right that what you have done in your example is an illusion. But in the example that I have given you, there is a mathematical pattern behind each PVK value of each address following an order. You yourself have given a clue about this: the common factor is not only the difference in PVK values but the mathematical relationship between one address and the next address.
It also goes without saying that I am not satoshi, we are not the same person.