Show Posts
To what extent? I've been told contracts have been ruled unenforceable if one party can unilaterally modify terms to their sole benefit in bad faith. Certainly they have the right to do what you said but if any violations were found they SHOULD have to provide proof, no?
When you create an account with a centralized exchange, you agree to all their T&Cs. But if you agree without reading all their T&C then it's your fault, their claim to modify T&C without informing their customers is definitely bad practice. But what you are claiming about T&C modification is there any solid proof that they actually modified, and if you are making this claim without any proof then it is baseless. Each centralized exchange reserves the right to recheck the account of any of its customers at any time.Hey.
Appreciate the reply and understood on T&C. I'm not claiming they are, it is my understanding that IF they are able to that can be seen the same as if they did. I'm not upset they checked my account because if they do the same for everyone it makes the space a better place. What concerns me is per their terms they are judge, jury and executioner. MEXC stated my account had abnormal transactions and if it did so be it but when I ask for proof of these violations they refuse. Would be different story if they supplied evidence for their allegations but they don't. By these standards MEXC can accuse any user of anything at any time and take all their money without providing proof if they wanted to.
