 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
Mine whatever you want. This coin mines inside wallet only. No pools, no standalone miner.
afaik you can use a clustered system ("pool") for mining. |
|
|
|
Reserved and awaiting escrow.
Thank you all.
is it already sold?? |
|
|
|
|
how much coins would a i5 3.3 ghz mine?
|
|
|
|
|
that s a load of fun! nice project ca333! and this time it s really easy. lol, nice hint, google was indeed a great help.
i am at lvl4 but stuck right now... guess i need a small break.
|
|
|
|
Hello Qora community. Just come to say we will listing Qora on alcurEX exchange, but because I'm only developer, there is some delay before I can start integration. Any way, you and Qora are most welcome to alcurEX. halibit  overall great news! thanks halibit! looking forward to trade on alcurex. friends already recommended your exchange. finally we re getting THE promising coin on it! |
|
|
|
Please let us know a week prior to the crowdfunding. lets make it happen this time.
yeah please post at least couple of days before it starts. we need to be prepared.. really looking forward! |
|
|
|
Sorry, I don't agree! I don't see what can be good to burn coins! Maybe I don't understand well...
But many coins will be lost on other ways - for example in lost wallets...
I love that coins are NOT burned, but go as fee from one wallet to another!
The idea is that whenever you burn coins, the rest of the coins become more valuable. This is a way to pay a dividend to all QORA holders. In this way, whenever someone ran a service that lots of people were using, it would make QORA itself profitable, and these profits would be given to everyone who had QORA coins, because some coins were burned, making the rest of the QORA that everyone held more valuable. Many of the top coins on CMC use this idea: Ripple, Bitshares, NXT, Counterparty. I think Ethereum will as well. Its a great way to provide value to the coin and get people excited about investing in it. Thanks for the explanations! I knew that of course.... but the burned amount is so less... in my opinion it is much better to pay for services directly and if necessary the fee can be higher! The higher fee would bring more people to forge! we can also think so: qora is POS system and generate more value in the time. so why not burn some amount of it? so its always good balance for it and NO inflation happen... well first i was also sceptical about the burning. but looking at it from your PoV i fully agree. thats a great way for balanceloading regarding the coincap/value. |
|
|
|
So I'd like to share a great news with the community. I've just had the most interesting talk with scriptmastr, and I'm happy to announce that we've got two extremely talented developers from Switzerland joining the Qora team! (Sorry i forgot your friend's ID.. is it cs333?  ) Anyways, I think you're extremely talented and very happy to have you guys on board! I'll let you guys introduce yourself.  Regards thanks for the kind and motivating words. my collegue is ca333. he s a very active and skilled developer and i am sure that he ll be an enrichement for this project. very excited about the future of the project and very optimistic regarding this dev-team as well as this community. thanks for the opportunity to join it! |
|
|
|
First, remember, these can't be "reserved" only "preferred". Second, I recommend that you use number of 1,000 or higher, ask suggested bt CIYAM and myself earlier. This is so that these IDs can be resevered and used in a more-official sense in the future.
My .02 cents on it. You can do whst you want to do, but after working in IT and with communications for years, I can say that "cherry picking" lower IDs (which is how this could be perceived) is a little unprofessional.
Please understand, I'm not hassling you, but trying to educate/advise on the situation and explain why I don't support using those values.
Okay, I agree.  I've got no problem with that.. So we're reserving lower 1000 IDs (from 1 to 1000) for core use??? Then I think I'll take 1000 to 1200 then (I'll need to revise my app, but thankfully, I haven't really uploaded too many transactions yet).. IF there is no objection.. Thanks for the feedback, btw.. Really appreciate it! agree. i ll take ID 1201-1221 btw i am working out a php API wrapper to allow wider adoption and also give other webdevs and supporters the chance to launch own qora-services. i miss a mobile wallet so thats the first thing i am going to build upon my API lib. i ll opensource all of my work. and i ll post updates here as well as on the site which will be hosting the mobile wallet. check it out! http://qora2go.pwplease support this project and donate some QORASent 2m qora to you. Wish you can do better. If you have any idea or something about crypto , you can pm me. I am working coinport which focus on bitcoin payment. oh wow! thanks a lot for this generous gesture. i really appreciate it. i am glad to be part of this yet young but so innovative and promising project! i ll drop you a message later on. and thanks again!! |
|
|
|
First, remember, these can't be "reserved" only "preferred". Second, I recommend that you use number of 1,000 or higher, ask suggested bt CIYAM and myself earlier. This is so that these IDs can be resevered and used in a more-official sense in the future.
My .02 cents on it. You can do whst you want to do, but after working in IT and with communications for years, I can say that "cherry picking" lower IDs (which is how this could be perceived) is a little unprofessional.
Please understand, I'm not hassling you, but trying to educate/advise on the situation and explain why I don't support using those values.
Okay, I agree. I've got no problem with that.. So we're reserving lower 1000 IDs (from 1 to 1000) for core use??? Then I think I'll take 1000 to 1200 then (I'll need to revise my app, but thankfully, I haven't really uploaded too many transactions yet).. IF there is no objection.. Thanks for the feedback, btw.. Really appreciate it! agree. i ll take ID 1201-1221 btw i am working out a php API wrapper to allow wider adoption and also give other webdevs and supporters the chance to launch own qora-services. i miss a mobile wallet so thats the first thing i am going to build upon my API lib. i ll opensource all of my work. and i ll post updates here as well as on the site which will be hosting the mobile wallet. check it out! http://qora2go.pwplease support this project and donate some QORA |
|
|
|
A little introduction and some quick note regarding Qora Services Explorer: 1. If there is no objection from the community, I'd like to reserve Service ID #10 - 100 for my personal development purpose. 2. Basically, the drop-down list contains a list of Services that are available to the end Qora users - Currently there are only two working services, but I plan to add more: MicroBlogging Service at Port 10, and Qora DarkNet (Hidden Web Service) at port 20... 3. Eventually, I plan to integrate a full node browser. Feedbacks & critiques are always welcome.  In case anyone is interested, this is the Qora project I've been working on in my spare time: Qora Services Explorer (with custom Qora Wallet), below you will find a screen capture..  i d like to reserve port #110 - #160. and btw - great work! going to announce my work later on. keep it up guys! |
|
|
|
Have also done this you guys relaly need to make this happen even if not using sendcoin or having it or an idea to use alt conis and btc as payment options on it then you guys got a killer app to contend with the rest of the world leading markets. Hey all, we are almost ready for the second crowdfund ! stay tuned BEST NEWS! we look forward for it! This project can help btc community extreme when we think about the potential userbase. So many people will have a chance to transfer BTC between each other in this great chatapplication. |
|
|
|
Lets see what happens when they release an official update
i see recent projects have all a slack. is there a slack for SendChat? Also i am very skilled webdesigner. So i can always help the project with responsive designed websites when the dev wants. |
|
|
|
I can state that they vowed on returning funds if mark wasn't met in their first funding round, and they actually did refund it all. Very honest team and project. Far better than any other project ive laid my eyes on. I am very tempted to participate in any other funding round. yes and REMEMBER: Alejandro showed us his real face. he is such a good marketer and honest project leader. +1 for this. when i join a project than its SendChat! the best decision you probably can make. |
|
|
|
I see you guys are still live, im still watching for any new updates.
i hope this project comes soon. it will give people possibilty to chat and also send bitcoins also when they have no idea of cryptocurrencies. Most important the developers been working hard very long (also saw their presentation in AMS). this brings so many new opportunities! giveaways, pr-campaigns for BTC, etc. unlimited options to spread the word for SEND aswell as BTC!! |
|
|
|
silence isnt golden in crypto , its shit!!!
i don't agree. better silence and NO word from dev but continous development and steady commits. THIS is GOLDEN. so in my honest opinion, your post is relative. in some projects communication is gold you are right here, but when you know the dev like Rofo, you also know that silence is a good sign.... look at the other coins publishing so many marketing and PR material. BUT development is shit. NAV for example. i had big trust because of their hyping and blablabla. but saw how they scam people and lie around to keep dumping. |
|
|
|
Hey guys were is the new wallet im not fuding just asking
there is no new wallet, there is only blah blah blah again... only blablah and lies. go some pages back and see whats happening. and be prepared for a crazy revelation shortly. this developers are amateurs... NO idea of serious development. shame. |
|
|
|
lmao so why wasnt this planned out prior?? idk about this one
because they have nothing. only a coinclone. so onvious it s a scam. they are liars. they said release on 9th march and lied on all. in 1h its on 2k sat. dead!!! NEVER will release. i warned all. check my previous postshistory. i paid a hacker to have a look on NaV and the beta wallet and take me runtime analysis and told me the truth. they have a shit mixnode setup. thats it. and they are not able to implement in a running blockchain. LIARS. why you doing this to crypto!!?! shame on you. |
|
|
|
|
AGAIN: NOTHING. if you keep buying this coin it s ur fault. NAVAJO is a shame for cryptos. this is it. they hype with a technology they say they are coding so long but nothing!!! liars... where is your centralized mixnode. not even this you were able to release because you can not develop!! only copy paste style until now. if they told truth they would already released...
|
|
|
|
any big buy support will get crushed from 300sat bagholders, i dont blame them, i would do the same
But you know at some point, all coins from those bagholders will be sold out and then nothing will stop the price. have you seen the richlist? i bet that only first wallet can hold NAV at 1000sat for weeks, and i am sure that he holds them since long time ago i must say that i am new with NAV, mined some summer and lost them, so my opinion is not at value, but that guy with 5M and few other top wallets, huge obstacle for solid buy support, plus that order book at bittrex, many round numbers on sell side, someone is slowly relasing bag you are fully right. and in the end the community will cry because they lose money... it s 9th march. there is NO anon network. all bullshit. they fucked the community. |
|
|
|
|
