Latest posts of: Weed Stuff

Show Posts
Pages: [1]

on: August 07, 2014, 09:09:43 PM

great bro seems like 74 nice car . let me see you in millioner llater with bitcoin.

on: August 07, 2014, 08:56:51 PM

maybe this people set a hg post or sex maximum 14 every 2 weeks to minimum spammer.

on: August 07, 2014, 08:50:29 PM

can anybody help to to find road map of this coin ? interested to folloow this one ,

on: August 07, 2014, 08:37:34 PM

hallo agan agan . salam kenal ya semuanya !!! lagi pada ngapain nih ?

on: August 07, 2014, 08:30:50 PM

interested to bet here . il be try this one now are you still offer some bonus or anything ?

on: August 07, 2014, 08:03:04 PM

Quote from: fuzzyhair2 on August 07, 2014, 06:01:48 PM Hey guys, I've sent two fairly small transactions, but they are not confirming. https://blockchain.info/tx/5f7905e66144bf6e06ce59a83b71d16e415c6859bddd5f0c646b7d78209cee4f https://blockchain.info/tx/2fd4330ce93de48f78be4cd9426607e12dbd6696b9708edce1305084c0e71fa3 I did send it with a fee, and they are not spam. In fact, I also sent this one which did confirm, for some reason: https://blockchain.info/tx/8a6bda1f78fab80ae2521b42805afa79df23d2bc9752a26a74e69a058131c59a So why is it that those two won't confirm for a day but this one did? I'm thinking of manually relaying the two transactions to Eligius, which does support small transactions. I think it's a matter of other nodes simply not relaying it, as they think it is spam. So how can I manually relay these? When I try to do a raw send in bitcoin-qt, an error comes up: dust makessure your network work perfectly . i think thats some error on pool . contact support .

on: August 07, 2014, 07:56:50 PM

interested . this will be bigger . its btc will touch 5k next year . i believe it will happened .

on: August 07, 2014, 07:50:33 PM

i never heard about thats . in my country its not legal .

on: August 07, 2014, 07:42:32 PM

interested what pool you use ? i still understand about this . this like cloud mining ?

on: August 07, 2014, 07:36:09 PM

Quote from: CIYAM on August 06, 2014, 11:37:53 AM I would guess the biggest problem you'd face with such an idea is "just how do you determine that someone has a full node"? This would not be a trivial thing to do as presumably it would require some sort of separate consensus algorithm (i.e. a "proof of storage" type idea). i think... thats not a big problem as we now thats easy to implement on it .

on: August 07, 2014, 07:29:10 PM

you should use blockchain wallet .easy . fast . popular.

on: August 07, 2014, 07:22:50 PM

Quote from: BTCewdquestion on August 06, 2014, 03:01:00 PM did i just lose a .2btc transaction because the fee was set at .2btc? maybe you download malicious ffile and you got monitoring of people . check your pc . sorry for your loss . fee never 0.20

Pages: [1]