Don't listen to anyone, especially people with new accounts, they are just toxic and want to spread toxicity, I'm exploring the code right now and everything is so good, keep developing and don't listen to losers who can't even bring something better than you, I'm a developer myself and from the bottom of my heart I hope for success in your project, the only thing is please don't create closed sources in the cryptosphere like pwa etc. because cryptocurrency should be open source, that should be the motto in the crypto world!

really beautiful & responsive website

The coin is still kicking & not dead, the block reward dynamically decreasing from 84 then 60 then 50 until 1, no one of course will get this block reward because only 45% to miners, yet I don't know if its GPU or ASICs mined, the premine is 10%, there is no hidden address & percentage for the dev other than the premine in the code. The only downside of this coin is almost no roadmap until now unfortunately!

I know why you are upset because first you want to announce on Bitcointalk hoping no one will check your code and ask you, second reason is because it is not Discord or Telegram where you can just block people who ask you especially if you don't know the answer or the answer will expose you, all the time on Bitcointalk when someone writes it it's just FUD and then time shows that it was just another scam or the coin was only for 2-3 months at best case scenario and then game over!

listed on 2 exchanges already

Where is the FUD in your links of my screenshot posts, Regus was a scam in the end, the other coin which released on April never listed, the last sceenshot you did, was about 3M premine that the dev never mentioned on Bitcointalk announcement, so for you the truth is fud when you face it, anyway have a good day

Excuse my curiosity, but how are you going to fund the project? I see there is a premine 1% (I think that's not enough to fund it), there is no dev percent and address there, or will you subtract some as a dev fee from the POW, POS, or masternodes coins?. PS, I know that decenomy uses a different approach than yours by mining all the coins at once & then spread the coins among masternodes but yours is different that is why I'm asking & the second reason I'm asking to be sure not another coin which will live 1-3 months and then game over!

Getting the explorer up and running isn't difficult task, after all it's open source, you just need to modify it a bit and host it on a VPS, I can help you with that, but first I need to finish Neoscrypt, as I'm working with one dev now (the project isn't mine), and then I'll have some free time if you can't get it working until then. As for the code modification, there's a lot of work to do, in fact it took RVN team 2 years to update the code last time.

Just ignore a clown like him, don't waste your time on this clown!

Deleted all references and charts of POS/MN, as for this phrase, I think the dev deleted only the part that related to the QT wallet (just to hide it), because as I explored the code the whole thing that related to Masternode stay there and some places just deactivated.


On Github "Deleted all references and charts of POS/MN" so all these masternode related like budget, sync, active, configurations, man, payments, spork, spork manager, spork id, spork db, swifttx, should be removed completely, then refactor the code and run tests, also if there is no stake or POS then all related to stake, stake input files should be too removed completely, finally masternode payment & collateral in tx verify, validation and other places also should be removed and refactored, then after that start to work with QT part and also refactor it and update its code, after that the codebase should be updated in small steps, and with the major version update we should pump protocol to make sure the mandatory update for the nodes to follow the new rules & modifications.


You can increase the total supply without the need for a new genesis, merkle and snapshot and there was such occasions in the past that some crypto projects increased the total supply, one project i remember even increased the supply from 25M to 90M but I think the community should vote for that after all, as for Zerocoin there was a coin named like that and in some old codebases still this part is there, while in new and updated one you won't find it, as for Zpiv its related to Pivx only and you don't need it at all in Peppa, as for block reward you can't change it easily because if you change it then you need a new genesis, merkle for all networks (mainnet, testnet & regtest) and maybe even a snapshot and swapping from old to new coins so its not an easy task and maybe its not worth it at all, also if you change the block reward then you should change all the block reward occurrences in the code & in test files too and change the hex value for the new block reward in some files. If you change the supply don't forget to adapt the subsidy, you can change it without needing a new genesis but if you increase the total supply, sometimes you may need a new logic for the subsidy part but this is easy to do after all.

PeppaPow same dev

I can do it but there are many things in the code that we should remove completely because we just don't need it, also this part of the code can create vulnerability in the future and make it hard to maintain the code, the Zerocoin part and its legacy part, the zpiv part we also don't need it completely, in fact the code itself has many problems, for example there is a masternode part but it is deactivated and I don't understand why add a masternode and then not use it at all, there is a premine part and people who can still have these coins, then here we have to decide which way to go, soft fork or hard fork, or take a snapshot of addresses, what about the supply, halving schedule, block reward etc, there are many things to decide and work on. Sometimes it's easier to start from scratch than to work on such code but if there is support from the community we can do it, nothing impossible after all.

80% for Masternode and 1000 coins for collateral, this made my day!

int64_t GetMasternodePayment(int nHeight)
{
    return GetBlockValue(nHeight) * 0.80;
}

There is no point to support a shiny project with fatal errors in the code itself

if (nPrevHeight < 1540) {
        nSubsidyBase = 5000;
} else if (nPrevHeight < 1840) {
        nSubsidyBase = 10;

What is the point of making another coin while you still didn't list your first coin which released in April?

There are many red flags around this coin, masternode only 25%, miners only 25%, premine for the dev is 3 millions. The dev didn't mention the 3 M premine on Bitcointalk announcement.

60% block reward for Masternodes and 40% for POS after Block height 100000? correct me if I'm wrong please

From the first day I checked the code of this project on Github, I knew this was going to have problems.

The difficulty for CPU mining is 100000 less than the one for ASICS, this is what the code says

Tell us the reason why you change the coinbase maturity from 100 to 20? Are you aware the risks of changing the coinbase maturity from 100 to 20?

This idea is wonderful but you need a really good fund for project like this, hope you all the best in your project.
Use case is building a censorship resistant social media ecosystem where content can be properly monetised by creators and users can be appropriately protected in their ability to speak freely