The dev is no longer reachable and this chain has been delisted.

If anyone is still mining this I suggest moving to a different coin/chain.

100k,nestex_one,27,1610,2025-09-23

Looks cool. We supported AdventureCoin for the same reason, so feel free to connect with me when you feel things are ready.

When you have a genuine need, like to fill in high risk money crunch. Or when you're "satisfied" or "done" with how things are and have made the decision to move to a different asset class due to whatever scenario (regulatory, social, financial, etc). Or in the worst case to "take profit and stop" but I don't know if that makes sense given governments are investing in bitcoin, so that will likely keep the momentum going.

Keep the momentum going!! 💪💪

100k,nestex_one,23,1360,2025-09-19

100k,nestex_one,22,1280,2025-09-18

Community listing recently with NestEx at https://trade.nestex.one/spot/MECU

Bro it doesn't let me, idk what broke


On the TrumPOW server #offtopic


Here's the server invite for you (right clicked your ID and chose 'Invite') https://discord.gg/TvcyTRvv

Thank you. We will improve on this over time; but yes we started operations just in March this year so still learning the ropes in terms of customer service. (Furthermore, I'm a tech lead and Liz is an investor so totally the wrong type of people to support end users properly; we are in the process of hiring good support agents that won't compromise our end users' data).



The fact that you took action to dissociate your identity from the other registrar proved that your intentions in using our services were not dishonourable. I offer a formal apology for the inconvenience caused.

In case you do use our services in future, please stay connected with me on discord, or you can just lurk and observe - you will see what we're all about. There is a reason over and above simple monetary gain that the coins we list are happy to work with us.

Agreed, on both points! Both are indeed unregistered exchanges (despite whatever they write about being registered in seychelles or bahamas or xyzzy).

I don't know of any registered, official, licensed exchanges that function without KYC though. And even if they're without KYC right now, within the year they will likely switch to full KYC (as KuCoin is doing, by charging a fee for the absence of KYC)

Of course, I'm not saying it was a bad thing; I just felt that DCA would have given more value-per-$ that's all.

In future I'll probably split the lump sum into a smaller one-off + multiple DCAs. It's just a change of approach I guess; let's see what happens!

It allowed me to sign up with a protonmail email; however it doesn't let me login saying "login with disposible email is not supported"

It may be cleaner just to prevent the signup, so users don't go through the process just to find their account unusable

If its a large platform on the scale of Kucoin - without KYC - there might not really be any.

I came across these that work without KYC
- Nonkyc.io
- Bitunix.com

I've seen users trade on these within the past 4-6 weeks and withdraw without difficulty, ~4 figures USDT (disclaimer: not sure if this is true for all their users though) and I've used them for a bit but for tiny amounts.

Not mentioning the exchange that I work with (NestEx) in this context since we are too new and don't yet have volume on BTC in the range mentioned by the OP.

So I did lump sum some time back, but personally I feel now (hindsight?) that splitting the same amount into a DCA would have been a more effective approach.

I bought in Nov '24, as a lumpsum. Then in Jan/Feb I was happy but in Feb we got a bit of a dip - right up until April.

Conversely if I'd done a small amount in Nov, then bought DCA below my last buy price I think I'd have made a bundle more.

The user has taken relevant corrective action as requested, and we've taken note of it. I've asked for an account unlock (which may get delayed a bit due to timezone differences), but this message is to indicate we've recognized that the resolution requested was indeed done.



As per our previous commitment,


I have personally re-verified the user's account balances
current balances = total deposits - amount sold - amount already withdrawn

The user (after login) can download the transaction by transaction report from the link (This will download an XLSX file with all trades in it, for the currently logged-in user)

Normally a bitcointalk response would not be needed in the support process; but we're responding here so the conclusion remains clear to all who read the thread.

As mentioned, I've asked for an account unlock (which may get delayed a bit due to timezone differences) - once the unlock is done I will update this message and inform the user via designated support channels.

The user has taken relevant corrective action as requested, and we've taken note of it. I've asked for an account unlock (which may get delayed a bit due to timezone differences), but this message is to indicate we've recognized that the resolution requested was indeed done.



As per our previous commitment,


I have personally re-verified the user's account balances
current balances = total deposits - amount sold - amount already withdrawn

The user (after login) can download the transaction by transaction report from the link (This will download an XLSX file with all trades in it, for the currently logged-in user)

Normally a bitcointalk response would not be needed in the support process; but we're responding here so the conclusion remains clear to all who read the thread.

As mentioned, I've asked for an account unlock (which may get delayed a bit due to timezone differences) - once the unlock is done I will update this message and inform the user via designated support channels.

100k,nestex_one,19,1070,2025-09-15

What makes BTC stand up till today
1. Stability and commitment: the core working of bitcoin has been extremely consistent, and devs have been highly committed to making improvements while keeping the core of it stable.
2. No change in assurances: the original assurance of anonymity (addresses) along with transactional transparency remain unchanged

and the most essential thing for any currency:
3. Account and transaction security: which hinges on the private keys et al of course; but this assurance is strong enough that, for example, I can be sure that you are not able to access my account unless I reveal the private key or pull some some self-compromising stunt.

and the most essential thing for any publicly available technology:
4. Publicly accessible source code that in and of itself - even while looking at the code - cannot be compromised despite revealing it's inner workings transparently.

There may be other factors but in my opinion these things are key.

Back in 2012-13 I thought it's all vapourware that will vanish in a few years; but time has proved points #1 and #2 which elevates my confidence. Points #3 and #4 are why I would personally continue to hodl it and invest in it.

In my view the presence of Satoshi (which will probably get challenged by Copa or someone else anyways 😅) or the absence of Satoshi will not be a major factor in the continued success of bitcoin.

Gmail does have rules/filters to block incoming email based on a + alias, so this can actually work

Based on what I saw on the thread during my limited time here (so naturally I've not read all of it), the practice seems to be "count days on which you did push ups, and discount the rest"

So in my case although my last recorded push ups were some time ago, this would mean I continue where I left off while discounting the days missed/skipped inbetween.

If this generally works for most people, you can consider making it a 'suggested practice' (even if it's not a 'rule' per se)? Just to standardize how we do this.

You're completely right to not leave too much $ on a CEX. I'm not completely into the "not your keys not your coins" stuff since I use for example binance and nonkyc and others exchanges; maybe even some shady ones to acquire alts. But I realize there needs to be a limit how much one trusts a 3rd party.

This is true for any CEX, since they're all subject to some kind of internal or external regulation which is hard to bypass/can't be bypassed.

(Disclaimer: I work for a CEX. Yes I will say the above, even given my own position, because it a fact)