Cryptix Fusion – AI-driven Fusioned Computing & Rewards in CPAY

Hi everyone,

I’d like to introduce you to Cryptix Fusion – a new project within the Cryptix ecosystem (CPAY COIN) that is currently in its testing phase.

Fusion is an AI-driven, fusioned computing network that turns unused CPU and GPU power into measurable economic value. Unlike traditional mining setups, it’s not just about cryptocurrency mining. Fusion distributes a wide variety of computing jobs, including:

• CPU-optimized: cryptographic operations, scientific simulations, data preprocessing, CPU-friendly coin mining
  
• GPU-optimized: AI training & inference, 3D rendering, ray tracing, GPU-friendly coin mining
  
• Hardware-agnostic: video transcoding, climate/physics simulations, bioinformatics, and more
  

The idea is simple: one client, one account, maximum profitability.  
No pool configs, no multiple wallets, no manual coin-switching. The system automatically detects your hardware, recalculates profitability every 60 seconds, and assigns the most rewarding jobs in real time.

Rewards & CCPI  
To fairly measure value across very different workloads, Fusion introduces the Cryptix Computing Power Indicator (CCPI):

• 1 CCPI = 1 USDT of computing value per 5 minutes
• Each job is priced in USDT, translated into CCPI, and then paid out in CPAY (the ecosystem’s native utility token)
  
• Crucially, rewards are not inflated block rewards — CPAY is purchased directly from the open market to fund payouts, creating constant buy-side liquidity
  

How payouts work:  

• Rewards are calculated every 5 minutes and credited to a Locked Balance
• Every 60 minutes, balances are released and become withdrawable
• Disconnects don’t cause losses — pending rewards are still credited

Current progress (September 2025):  

• CPU backend, servers, and integration complete
• CPU worker software in test runs
• V1 (CPU Early Access) coming soon
• GPU backend already finished, GPU worker software now in testing
• Future plans: more job types, additional servers, V2 (public CPU + GPU release)

Other hardware options (HDD/SSD, RAM, smartphone workers) are being evaluated.

Why it might be interesting for miners and compute enthusiasts:  

• Payouts are market-backed, not inflationary
• Automatic profit-switching across jobs and coins
• Supports far more than mining — scientific and AI workloads included
• Fair play: the CPAY blockchain is only mined directly if it’s clearly the most profitable option, keeping pools and miners unaffected

For anyone with unused computing resources, Fusion could be an efficient way to put them to work. The client is currently in testing, and early feedback will help shape the system as it grows.

More info & technical details:  
- Whitepaper: https://cryptix-network.org/assets/downloads/cryptix-fusion.pdf  
- Overview: https://cryptix-network.org/cryptix-fusion  
- News: https://cryptix-network.org/news  
- CPAY Blockchain infos: https://cryptix-network.org/cryptix-dashboard
- Memberarea & Fusion System: https://cryptix-network.org/member-area  

Discord: https://discord.cryptix-network.org/

The V1 release is expected in about a week. Maybe a few weeks later, maybe sooner. Follow our Discord/website news to be ready. User accounts and tests are already freely accessible to everyone in the member address. The V1 release will be CPU-only; we will enable GPU functionality (AMD + NVIDIA) 1-2 weeks later. HDD and RAM are also planned. A smartphone app and a marketplace are also planned so users can rent hardware/CCPI directly from other users for an additional commission.

It’s important to note that payouts are made in CPAY, our cryptocurrency, which is based on its own decentralized blockchain.  
CPAY can also already be traded on Exbitron at:  
https://app.exbitron.com/exchange/?market=CPAY-USDT

You can access your old Coins (CYTX) here:
https://old-wallet.cryptix-network.org/


And yes Exbitron is at the moment offline cause a Bug. Hopefully they are soon back.

Hey here some Basic Informations:

All what have the old CYTX Coin, can swap the Coins to the new CPAY Blockchain via Exbitron Exchange.

Webwallet to do it:
Old CYTX Coin: https://old-explorer.cryptix-network.org/
New CPAY Coin: https://explorer.cryptix-network.org/

Explorer:
Old CYTX Coin: https://old-wallet.cryptix-network.org/
New CPAY Coin: https://wallet.cryptix-network.org/

Market to exchange / swap the Coins from CYTX to CPAY:
https://app.exbitron.com/exchange/?market=CYTX-CPAY

Here is the new Miningsoftware:
https://cryptix-network.org/cryptix-miner-cpu-gpu

Or:
https://cryptix-network.org/cryptix-all-in-one

Well, MecaCex has concealed its identity and servers through Cloudflare. If no one knows where it's from, the authorities can't do anything either. And as everyone knows, the authorities are currently very clueless when it comes to this type of fraud.

But we have identified the host and also the fraudster's personal origins. He deliberately entered the false information and pretended to be from Korea, which isn't true. He's from Vietnam.

And anyone can file a report in Vietnam, regardless of where they come from. There are special email addresses and authorities for this, especially for cybercrime.


Well, a moderator could move the post into the category.

But the post already ranks high in Google searches for "MecaCex Scam." Providers like MiningPoolStats and others have already removed MecaCex.

The scammer won't find as many victims anymore.

But he'll surely appear under new names soon if he stops finding new victims, just as he has done several times before.

That night, our Scammer friend from MecaCex created another new account on Exbitron to sell stolen coins.

He had to use a different USDT address, which you can check:
https://bscscan.com/address/0x2d5ddc7e645c768dd79130c525658f8a674a5b5e

This is the wallet of an old scam platform, FinanceX. This is the registered hot wallet for this platform.

It's now official: MecaCex and FinanceX are the same scam artists.

Here's the transaction he made last night:
https://bscscan.com/tx/0xbb5035f435961f49ff7b9742381fdb36aa2fbcaad1e63684c0a4df7c3c9edee4

No, you don't have to file a report in every country. Fraud reports are processed by the offender's country. Our report has already been accepted by the Vietnam police in the offender's city. If you file a report in your country, nothing will happen. If you file a report in the perpetrator's city, it will. That's why there are so many crypto scammers. Because users can't reach them or choose the wrong route.

We have reported MecaCex for intentional fraud through various methods, including market manipulation and embezzlement of customer funds/coins. All with evidence. He has defrauded countless users. He has stolen liquidity from crypto projects and sold the coins on other markets. And so on.


But here is some evidence so that these are not just accusations:


1. Here are pictures from users in our community who haven't received their money yet (they waiting over months). There are many such screenshots and evidence, but I think three are enough:

https://imgur.com/a/llyyaFv

I alone know of several thousand USDT that have simply been stolen from users. They haven't been paid out for months. And when users inquire about it, they don't receive an email response. If they go to Mecacex's Discord to ask, they and them account will be banned. Like people in this Threads sayd.



2. This is MecaCex's market wallet for the CYTX coin:
MecaCex has sold all user CYTX coins to another market (Exbitron), including the developer liquidity provided. At the same time, MecaCex still has the users' sell orders in the system, which currently amount to 2 million coins. But the coins are no longer available; MecaCex has already sold them. MecaCex currently only has 500 coins.


Check them Wallet:
https://explorer.cryptix-network.org/addresses/cryptix:qpg92039s8y7pggk5dl7egaq28rwjawwzfykqqgk063w854gtpjeq6ndhs3fg?page=1

And Check them Market Orders:
https://mecacex.com/market/CYTXUSDT


MecaCex selling the Coins sometimes everyday and sometimes every week to other Markets. All small Coins they get, not only CYTX:

Here are Examples. They do it until "Tue Mar 19 2024".

• Sun Apr 27 2025
  06:23:23
  116.105.33.XX   Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/135.0.0.0 Safari/537.36   "Windows"
• Tue Apr 22 2025
  15:39:30
  171.251.4.XX   Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/135.0.0.0 Safari/537.36   "Windows"
• Fri Apr 18 2025
  02:17:32
  116.98.62.XX   Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/135.0.0.0 Safari/537.36   "Windows"
• Tue Apr 08 2025
  23:39:30
  116.105.170.XX   Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/135.0.0.0 Safari/537.36   "Windows"

You could ask Exbitron, and the admins will confirm it. They also banned MecaCex's account for fraud.


MecaCex also claims to be Korean and regulated. But that's not true; they're from Vietnam. Or rather, it's just one person. Not multiple people. It's a scammer from Vietnam. And there's no regulation or registration. It's an illegal scam market that has had many scam markets before. The scammer has been doing this for many, many years.

He also uses every possible means of fraud. He defrauds users by stealing USDT and other coins, and he defrauds crypto developers by stealing liquidity. He manipulates the market with supposedly low offers to attract new users, who come through the low price of the coins. But they don't receive them because the market doesn't have any coins.

He's played through the fraud scheme and is a textbook version of planned cryptocrime. Guys, warning as many users as possible so he doesn't have any more victims.

The true identity of "Mr. Lee" (he is the owner of MecaCex) has now been uncovered — and as suspected,
his name is not Lee, and he is not Korean.

 He is originally from Vietnam, specifically from Quảng Nam Province.
His personal internet provider is Viettel Group.

His private email address is: ozinexexchange@gmail.com    (a old exchange?)


This means that if someone has been cheated, they must file a report with the authorities in Vietnam.

Our community will file a mass complaint against the operator for fraud, embezzlement of customer funds, illegal operation of a market, false identification claims, market manipulation, and so on. We have his full identity and evidence. We also have evidence that he has defrauded other crypto projects, for example, selling liquidity on other exchanges.

MECACEX: Here's a clear warning to everyone:

Do not use the MecaCex market. Many users have been scammed, and thousands of dollars have been stolen from them. We tested it ourselves with a test account and were scammed.

The coin offers on the MecaCex market do not exist. These are uncovered offers, which constitute market manipulation. Our provided liquidity was also illegally sold and misappropriated.

This market is a scam in every way. Do not use it.

That's why we warn against MecaCex.
MecaCex should not be used, as many users have been scammed. Even if MecaCex tries to attract users with seemingly cheaper prices.

There are special posts on our website and in Discord that expressly advise against using MecaCex.

Unfortunately, there are always false claims circulating about Cryptix & its developers, so we want to clarify this topic:

It all started back in the testnet phase. During development—weeks before the genesis block was mined—people from other cryptocurrencies joined our channel. Some used fake accounts, others joined with their real developer accounts. Even team members from other cryptocurrencies and pool operators were among them.

Some of them were quite negative and critical. At first, we made an effort to respond to questions, clarify things, and address concerns. However, we quickly realized that it didn't matter what we wrote or how much information we provided. It was never about understanding or constructive criticism—it was an attempt to suppress, discredit, and block us. That became clear very quickly, though we didn’t yet understand why.

Miners frequently joined the testnet, not realizing that it wasn’t the final genesis. Even though we repeatedly announced this, they continued mining—just in case it turned out to be the real genesis. With each reset, the number of miners decreased—partly due to changes in the PoW hash and partly due to laziness in redownloading everything. Some miners, however, were persistent. Within five minutes of us changing the PoW and resetting the database, they had already updated and were back online. At that time, we had no idea who these miners were. Later, by analyzing IP addresses, we found that some of them were possibly team members or operators themselves (though it’s impossible to say for sure).

We could have made our GitHub repository private, but that might have led to regulatory issues regarding securities classification, as we would no longer be considered open-source. So, we left everything public and accessible from the testnet phase—weeks before the real blockchain launch.

We estimated a possible release date of 01/02/2025 (DD/MM/YYYY), always emphasizing that it was an approximate date and not a fixed deadline. We planned to release as soon as development allowed. There was never a firm promise of a specific date—it was always marked with "" and words like "approximately." This was mainly due to multiple issues with the first pruning point, which we initially didn’t understand. Later, we discovered the genesis block itself was the issue, which we then resolved.

Before the release, around 100 people were in the Discord group, and over 20 miners were already on the network. The exact number was hard to determine since IP addresses kept changing. Some even used scripts to constantly switch IPs to avoid possible bans. This significantly disrupted our development work and delayed everything.

When we launched, we knew we wouldn't receive many coins—yet we needed them for development, community events, server costs, and so on. Unlike other cryptocurrencies, we have no developer fee on blocks. The only fee currently in place is a 1% fee on the mining software, which can be removed and operates under an MIT license. There are also external mining software options. Additionally, our mining pool has a 1% fee, but users can mine on their own node or use external pools. Otherwise, there are no fees—it’s entirely possible to use Cryptix without any fees.

Other cryptocurrency projects falsely claimed that we had a developer fee. Where? Check the transactions—there is none.

So how were we supposed to cover our costs? What about the work, time, and development effort? How should a long-term crypto project survive? If it’s a legitimate project and not some pump-and-dump scam that buys expensive listings and traps retail investors, it needs sustainable funding.

Of course, we had to mine at the very start of the blockchain to obtain enough coins. Our initial goal was to mine around 10–12%. As a side note, Ethereum, for example, had around a 60% premine/pre-distribution.

In the end, the entire Cryptix team collectively mined about 8%. This was below our expected range but still acceptable for a long-term project. Testnet miners were also very active at launch, some with significant hash power. We have never hidden this fact—why would we? Are we expected to pay for everything out of our own pockets forever? Is it illegal for us to own coins? Are we expected to work for free? That’s absurd and completely detached from reality.

To clarify: by the official definition, there was no "premine." The source code was always online and accessible, meaning anyone could have mined at any time. Some people did.

Apparently, some just missed their chance. On launch day, we already had 250 GH/s, meaning they weren’t the first miners. Maybe they were asleep? One particular project owner who missed the start became our biggest hater.

Similarly, a pool operator claimed—three days before release—that everything was set up and tested. However, at launch, it turned out he was still running an old version of the node with an outdated PoW hash—about three weeks old. This means he hadn’t actually done anything and even lied about being "ready" and having "tested everything." How could he have tested it with an outdated node? I had no idea he had done nothing, but I did notice an old node on the network and repeatedly asked in Discord who it belonged to. The pool operator knew there was a new PoW hash available for a week but still didn’t update in time. That’s incredibly unprofessional.

When the launch happened, he and his friends demanded that we reset the blockchain—just because they missed out on early mining and didn’t update their pools in time. Some team members even pressured us, saying we had to reset. But miners were already mining, and there was no technical reason to reset—only their own failure to prepare. They literally tried to blackmail us, saying that if we didn’t reset, they would "destroy" our coin.

We didn’t reset the blockchain, as everyone knows.

Afterward, fake accounts started spreading misinformation—coming from these same crypto project operators, their team members, and the pool operator’s group. They falsely claimed there was a premine, that the genesis block had high payouts (it had none—this is verifiable), and that our GitHub repository wasn’t always public (it was). They called us scammers—always the same people, always from fake accounts. Some were just upset they missed the early mining opportunity; others were jealous or saw us as competition. Some were simply asleep when we launched.

We have since cut all contact with these people, blocked them, and ignored their private messages (of which there were many attempts).

As the lead developer, I’ve heard a lot of wild claims about my identity. First, I was a Chinese student. Then, I was a crypto developer named "GOR" from another project. Then, I was a Finnish water company owner. Now, apparently, I’m from Israel. I’ve even seen photos of "me" that were completely fake. Every single claim has been wrong—not even the country was correct. No one on our team has ever been involved with another cryptocurrency. But think about how insane these people are—how much time they spend on this nonsense instead of developing their own projects.

And that brings me to my next point: I’ve looked into these people’s projects. Their coins are 6–12 months old, yet they’ve developed nothing. Absolutely nothing. Just copy-paste code and minor tweaks to make it look like progress. They advertise AI, but after a year, there’s still none. They claim to fix security flaws that never existed. Not a single one of these projects has real development—just superficial code changes from other sources.

Some of them are outright criminals. I know of fraud cases involving mining pools manipulating algorithms to falsely claim rewards. This is fraud in every country.

My advice: research crypto projects carefully. Don’t just trust roadmaps—anyone can write anything. Look at real development. Check how long a project has been around and what unique innovations it offers. Protect yourself as a miner or user.

And when a crypto project only talks about other projects, especially with lies or negative tone, then you know for sure that they are not focused on the progress of their own cryptocurrency. A normal developer focuses on his own project and not on others. It already shows everything.


We will no longer respond to these fake accounts. If you have any questions, come to our Discord with a real account. We are transparent and have nothing to hide.

We'll see after the police have been to your place. And then you can speak about "infected" Nodes on other Coin Projects too, yes we know this too. And about your russian "Dubai" Coin.

Thank you for taking the time – I really appreciate it.

According to our lawyer, we are currently not allowed to provide any information about the attackers, as the investigations are still ongoing. For the same reason, we cannot confirm any names.

However, we can say that we have engaged specialized lawyers in the target countries to handle and follow up on the criminal complaints. One complaint has indeed been filed with the public prosecutor's office in Moscow, Russia. But not only there—complaints have also been filed in two other countries. In total, 12 different offenses have been reported, including extortion, stalking, attempted hacking, and anti-competitive behavior.

We are also in contact with other blockchain operators who were likely attacked by the same individuals—whether through social engineering, DDoS attacks, or other methods. These operators have now joined forces and filed criminal complaints with the same attorney.

If you'd like, send me a private message on Discord, and I can provide you with the contact details of the attorneys handling the cases in each country.

It would be great if we could stop these criminals.

Now Mr. Kobra, Mr. Pool Operator, and all of you colleagues, we have already reported you to the police in your countries and filed charges for defamation, hacking, stalking, and unfair competition or illegal competition through our lawyer. All the reports have been received by the police, and we will see each other in court. Your identities are already known because you aren't as anonymous as you thought, due to server and domain registrations. You even forgot to use your VPN in some cases. Unfortunately, there is no other way to stop you, so let the court and the police do it.

P.S. Kobra, your payload attacks were easily predictable. We intentionally let them through and acted like we didn’t know what was happening to obtain the IP addresses and hoped you'd forget the VPN, which you did. After we had gathered all the evidence we needed, we stopped your attacks, or rather, your attacks. It wasn't just you. We know your exact location and the police already know your name through the telecommunications provider. That was the last coin you extorted and harmed with. We will stop you through the police and the law.

As I already mentioned, the numbers may not have been correct initially, but as we observed, they should correct themselves at pruning points. The value should now be accurate and match expectations. And even if it were the case? So what? It aligns perfectly with our planned distribution of 24% by 03/2025 or 54% by 01/2026. A fast coin distribution is in our interest and has been intentionally designed this way. Since we are not a meme coin but an end-use system, this is necessary.

No, the genesis had no payout—this can be verified in the source code.

Next: Whom did we cheat? Who was scammed, and in what way? We can release our coin however we want—when, how, and where. We don’t need to ask for your permission. Especially not from a user running three fake accounts simultaneously, who has already launched five coin projects with highly questionable outcomes. That says it all.

Even if it were a premine, that is completely allowed and entirely normal. Since we have no developer fees, there is no issue. And legally, this does not need to be stated in the whitepaper. If you believe otherwise, then please provide me with the relevant law. Our lawyer has reviewed EU and US regulations, and everything has been legally overseen and complied with. But in our case, this wasn’t even a premine, as the source code is public and accessible to all users. This, too, was legally supervised.

Hiding a developer fee of, for example, 1-5% within transactions without informing users and not mentioning it in the whitepaper—that would be "cheating." The same applies to secretly implementing it afterward, especially after drunkenly burning your premine coins and deleting the Discord.

Looking at your failed projects, it's clear that you have no understanding of laws or obligations. You simply don’t get it—even after being told five times. And I won’t explain it to you again. I won’t respond to your fake account anymore. Log in with your real account, and we can continue this
conversation.


But to answer your question: Yes, we launched the Genesis block and were likely the first miners in the network while the source code was public and other users had access to mining. However, since we already had miners in the network during the first Testnet Genesis, we were not "alone." We also mined a significant number of coins—proportionally reasonable for long-term development and associated costs.

Our initial plan was to mine around 10-12% of the coins, but since there were already miners in the network, we adjusted this to 6-9%. As a result, we couldn’t mine as many coins as originally planned. And let’s be honest—there are projects with 20-40% actual premine, plus additional developer fees. Even well-known, successful projects like ETH had over 50%. Long-term development requires funding, especially if the coin is meant to have real-world utility. For example, in order to develop and distribute NFC cards to our community, we need significant financial resources. Just do the math—what does it cost to produce 1,000 cards at $10 each? And that’s just one example. Partnerships with POS systems or ATM providers are even more expensive—we have already gathered offers for such collaborations. This isn’t about system development but simply securing cooperation with providers.

At this moment, we cannot provide an exact figure for how many coins the team has accumulated in total. Due to the release and the related challenges, we haven’t had the time to calculate it yet. However, we plan to compile the numbers and attempt to extract tables from the database for a clearer overview. Since we weren’t the only miners, we cannot precisely determine how many coins were mined at any given time—whether the database filler worked or not. That’s why the current estimate is 6-9%.

At the time of your screenshot—which I believe is incorrect—about 9.5% had been distributed. However, we didn’t mine all of those coins ourselves. Despite our request for the community to refrain from mining, users did the exact opposite. Even if 11% had been reached at that point, it would have been only ~2% more than planned. This happened because, immediately after Genesis, a difficulty of 1 was set (which was a mistake on our part), leading to a flood of blocks and significant percentage fluctuations.

Here is the part about this Topic in our Whitepaper, was written BEFORE the first Genesis was mined allready:



What is Premining?

Premining refers to the creation or distribution of coins before the official launch of the blockchain or network, without offering the community equal access to them. This typically involves the coins being allocated through the genesis block or mined before the community or users have access to the source code. Premining is often seen as unfair or centralized, as it allows certain individuals (like developers, early investors, or project teams) to hold a significant portion of the coins prior to the public launch. This can undermine trust in the project.


What is Not Premining?

If the source code is publicly available and accessible at the time of the official launch, it is not considered premining—especially if the genesis block does not include any payouts. Premining specifically refers to the prior distribution of coins to select individuals before the official start of the network. The official launch of a project is generally marked by the activation of the network (mainnet), the creation of the first block, and the public release of the source code. If the source code is published, and the mining process starts simultaneously with the launch, there is no premining involved.

Cryptix Case Example:
In the case of Cryptix, no blocks were mined before the source code was publicly available via the website or GitHub. The source code was accessible to the public for weeks, even during the development phase. As a result, we encountered issues with existing miners before the final genesis block was mined and the network was officially launched, which disrupted our development. The Cryptix team will begin mining immediately upon the release, which will occur as soon as the final genesis block is created. We estimate that we will mine 6-9% of the total coins, which is relatively low compared to other projects. Many projects impose 20-40% developer fees, meaning the developers take a portion of transaction fees or block rewards (i.e., a percentage of all coins). In the case of tokens, founders may even own 100% of the tokens and still charge developer fees for transactions. Cryptix, however, operates with a 0% developer fee. The coins we mine will primarily be used for future development, long-term community engagement, liquidity, exchange listings, and other strategic purposes. The Cryptix Genesis had no Payout.



It is important to understand that the development of a cryptocurrency and blockchain project requires significant financial resources and a lot of time. Development environments must be paid for, seed servers are needed for network launch, licenses, additional servers, security systems, domain systems, email systems, and more. All of this costs money, which developers must often pay out of their own pockets. The months or even years of work and time invested are not even factored in. Users and miners often expect developers to work for free, but this is far from reality. Why should developers pay for everything and give away their time and effort? Moreover, further steps towards the success of a cryptocurrency, such as listing on centralized exchanges (CEX), require even more financial resources. Listing on these platforms is not free. Additionally, the coin itself is necessary for initiating trading. In our opinion, it would be impossible for a developer to create a successful crypto project without owning their own coin. Another important consideration is long-term motivation—cryptocurrency projects should be supported and developed over the years, not just until the initial release. Developer fees or early mining of a coin are essential for developers and the team to cover costs and ensure the success of the project. The key is that these fees are fair and reasonable. Unfortunately, this has often been abused in the past by "pump and dump" projects. The same applies to trading platforms, pool providers, and mining software developers. A pool provider has significant costs for servers, a trading platform must ensure server capacity and security, and a mining software provider must continuously update the software and support each coin individually. Anyone who has ever written a GPU driver knows how complex and time-consuming that work can be.

Such allegations alone are more than impudent, even punishable. You know that, that's why you have a fake account. Why not log into your real account or share your identity, then we'll be happy to continue writing. Isn't that a good deal?

Please send the link to this version of the database filler, I'd like to test it. Then there would be good data and the database would be error-free. Can you send the Github link here?

I will no longer respond to fake accounts, only to normal users, which means log into your real account if you have something to say. But you could still send the link for the DB filler, if it even exists.

And yes, the Explorer is publicly accessible, including the database filler. The Rest API is also publicly accessible, as is Node. Do you notice anything?

And if there are no invalid blocks, what is that? Such blocks are counted in the overall statistics, according to my observations. And they are entered into the database by the database filler. It has to happen, otherwise you wouldn't be able to see it in the explorer, which loads the database. So if there were no invalid blocks, this image would not exist. These also exist in the kaspa blockchain, have I changed the database there too? :
https://i.ibb.co/FL7j6jQs/1111111111111.png

It is also sad that there are people who have nothing better to do than to annoy and harm other people. People who are not able to build something and therefore want to destroy it.

And again about premine, if a source code is permanently public, meaning every user has the opportunity to mine. Then it is not a premine. Premine is when coins are mined before everyone else has access to the coin or the opportunity to mine. That is premining. Nothing else. Hence "pre". Being the first to mine, as a developer, has nothing to do with premining if the code and everything is public. I also suspect that every Genesis was mined by the developer, I don't think that other developers waited and then couldn't mine their own coins because there were already strong miners in the network. I don't know what you can't understand about it? Or do you simply not want it because you have nothing else to get upset about? And even if developers premine or charge a developer fee? So what? It is normal, it is allowed, it is understandable. In our case, the source code has been online for months, months before the last Genesis was mined, even before the first test block was mined, it was public and never private for a second. That makes it not a premine. It is logical that we were among the first miners, mined the Genesis and received some coins through it. It has to be that way, otherwise a release on an exchange would not be possible, long-term development and so on. This is also included in the white paper, even before the release. Everything I wrote, maybe you will read it.

That's not even correct. The DB Filler doesn't read the blockchain and extract the data fully, only partially. If the DB Filler fails, there's a gap in the transactions. It won't pull all the data. For example, if you delete the database of the DB Filler and restart it, it will start from the moment it's turned back on, old data won't be pulled from the blockchain anymore. Try it out. You haven't noticed this after 20 projects? You also didn't notice that invalid blocks are temporarily added? Because all blocks are added in real-time without being checked first? And then later marked as valid or invalid, but counted in the overall score up to pruning points? You haven't noticed this? And no, this has nothing to do with the chain. It's truly amazing what you haven't noticed after 20 projects, such simple things.

But I do find it really cool that you created a new account for this, the third one. It's also a bit scary at times. Did you forget your old passwords or develop another personality? And don't you have anything better to do if you're involved so professionally in 20 projects?

As we said, according to our analysis, the data is incorrect because invalid blocks are being counted. It’s questionable whether this always happens until the pruning point or if it’s permanent. We will fix it. The next question is, are we the only ones who have mined? Have we received all the coins so far? And this, even though we had a network rate of 50 GH/s within a few hours of the genesis start? And currently, 1 TH/s? So, I don’t own 1 TH/s of mining power, even though you may think that illogically. And why would I then use 1 TH/s if I were the only miner? 1 KH/s would be enough. And we have over 250 accounts on Discord, writing in different languages, and created thousands of wallets? Completely illogical.



But we don’t owe you any explanations. As said, work on your failed Kobra Coin and don’t harass other developers. Whoever thinks the project is cool, is welcome to join our community. Those who find it questionable or not good, should stay away. Topic closed. We now unfortunately need to continue working on our project, so we can’t entertain you any longer. Maybe you should do the same? All the best.

Edit:
As mentioned, we are trying to acquire 6-9% of the coins (read the Whitepaper before next time), which was actually the plan, so that we would have enough coins for a long-term project. Years of development, markets, servers, collaborations, community events, and so on. That was the plan for the release, and there is nothing wrong with that. Even if you don’t understand this, since your project wasn’t built for the long term, as was clearly seen. As a developer, owning a certain number of coins or having a developer fee is completely normal. We couldn’t reach our planned values because there were already too many miners in the network with too much computing power. But we have received enough coins to continue working on the project and pursue our goals.

That is also incorrect. At this moment, less than 11% has been reached, we are just below that. We are not hiding anything; we are currently overhauling the REST API because it is faulty and does not provide correct values. It is showing invalid blocks, meaning blocks that have been declared invalid by the blockchain are being included in the supply amount. Once we fix this, we will publish a statistics page. Since we started with a difficulty of 1, there were large amounts of invalid blocks that were recognized as valid by the REST API. We didn’t anticipate this, and it was a mistake. That’s why we are now fixing the REST API and trying to find a solution.

So how is it possible that we supposedly own 11% of the coins if less than 11% has been reached? Additionally, since the Genesis Miner has been in the network from second one, and we offered the beta mining to everyone. These are completely false claims, coming from a bitter and failed developer. You should focus on your KobraDAG (Kobra) Coin instead of harassing other developers with fake accounts and trying to damage other projects. By the way, what you are doing is illegal under competition law, are you aware of that? And everyone knows what your project was – the very thing you're trying to accuse others of.

We could also mention that your developers destroyed the Multihash.dll for Miningcore, making Miningcore unusable for Windows, but that's another topic. Now, back to the issue:

We had originally calculated that we could mine 6-9% of the coins, as described in our whitepaper. Unfortunately, we couldn't reach those numbers. So we have fewer coins for permanent development purposes, servers, advertising, etc., than initially planned, but we are still continuing our work. Just a side note, coins like ETH had a real premine of 68%, if I remember correctly.

I would also recommend that you educate yourself about what a premine actually is, as you throw words around without understanding them. If a project has the source code publicly available and other users – meaning all users – have access and can mine, then it is not premine. And that was the case with us; we have kept all source codes, including the CPU miner in the node, publicly online for months, without taking any code offline for a second. This is also verifiable. You neither understand premine nor what it involves and are giving damaging false statements because you failed with your own project and are full of hatred. Therefore, we will not waste any more time on such accusations and will ignore them. But it's normal – every coin, even the most successful ones, had such accusations at release. There are always opponents and envious developers, especially those who have failed themselves and now have no purpose.

We still wish you all the best.

There weren’t many messages in Discord that we had to delete. It was mostly just the Russian channel because there were a lot of bizarre messages there, including arguments between other coins and pool operators—topics that had nothing to do with our project. We didn’t want to have that on display for others at the time of release, so we cleared the channel. Across the entire Discord, there really weren’t many messages since there haven’t been that many discussions yet.

I do find it interesting that there’s a rule stating messages cannot be deleted, especially when they include questionable GIFs and messages. We thought it was our responsibility to filter such things before the release. But next time, we’ll ask you first if you allow it and if you think it’s the right decision.

As for the next point—it's up to us when and how we release our coin. We don’t need to ask you for permission, nor do we owe you anything. Also, read the message I just wrote again—it’s clear that you either didn’t read it or didn’t understand it. A translator might help you with comprehension. We tried to be fair when we noticed miners on the network, ensuring that everyone had an equal right to mine.

But hey, cool that you made an account here after getting banned from Discord for repeatedly insulting mods and other community members. It’s obvious that you no longer have anything to do with this project after being banned. We also ask you to stay away from this project—we don’t want people like that in our community. Have a great day.