Anytime I watch Nottingham Forest recently I really wonder wondered if the sacking of Nuno was good for the club or was the president ego just to big, even bigger than the club.
As far, I would consider this a mistake because, in the end, professionalism lost out to ego, which only made the situation worse. Last season, under Nuno, Nottingham was a dark horse and always a stumbling block for the big clubs, but this season will be very different. This is not to exaggerate Nuno's name here, but the performance is the proof that ultimately makes us realize that what the management did was too hasty. Although it cannot be denied that even if he stays, there is no guarantee because his relationship with the club owner is deteriorating, but in the end, it is only because of his greater ego that their performance at the start of this season is so far removed from last season that it is too risky for me because even now they have to struggle in an uncomfortable position in the standings. Nottingham Forest management laying off Nuno Espirito Santos from the club was a big mistake that by now they will be regretting doing that. When your ego comes before your fall, Nottingham Forest is now paying for the wrong call. Nuno E. Santos won manage of the month with Nottingham Forest in Decem and March of last season, an award given to recognise the best manager in the premiership. He was truly the brain behind Nottingham Forest performance ans how they qualified to the europa. This season Forest is a watered down version of what they were last season and it could tank more than this when the competitions In the season gets intense. |
|
|
|
The sports industry has become a highly lucrative business, so when a major team like Liverpool doesn't win anything in a season, there's a price to pay. Arne Slot won't be secure and irreplaceable just because of one fantastic season, but Liverpool isn't a team that changes managers frequently. I think Arne Slot will be retained for various reasons, but it also depends on how Liverpool finish the season.
Any manager will always be under immense pressure when their team's performance falls short of expectations. Pep Guardiola won't be safe next season if City don't win anything this season, nor will Amorim or Enzo Maresca at Chelsea.
Football is now a huge investment and club owners wants to have their clubs make impressive finish in the season by winning trophies. What Liverpool has spent were aimed at winning back the premier league to make profit from trophy money and catch big sponsors. You are correct on Liverpool I'm terms of changing coaches, A. Slot position in Liverpool is safe more than any of the top club's coaches like Chelsea, Arsenal, Manchester city, Tottenham, Newcastle united and Manchester united. With the pressure on a lot of these club managers to produce excellent results and win a major trophy for the season with their club some of the managers I fear for the fate of many of them finishing this season with the club they are with. |
|
|
|
Laszlo's pizza incident is really interesting but I think he is now regretting doing this.
To be honest, none of us know about the future. And if it were really known, I don't think anyone would have spent thousands of BTC on pizza like this.
However, the BTC transaction from the old wallet can be for various reasons such as: security purpose or many people may have sold something or got back the lost wallet and became active. The biggest truth is that no one knows about the future and no one is sitting anywhere as a seer of Bitcoin.
While making the speculation about Laszlo regretting his action of buying pizzas for 10,000 bitcoins, have you stopped to think that was not the only bitcoins he was having, it may be he has much in excess and the 10,000 bitcoins he used in buying pizzas were a fraction of al the bitcoins he owns that time. What of the seller of the pizzas, did he kept those bitcoins till date to make profit in present bitcoin price? The future is not for us to see we can be making speculations and not all will be of reality. Not all moved bitcoins from old wallets are moved to be sold, I'll be scared having that huge bucks of dollars in BTC in a single wallet, spreading it to different wallets makes losing it all to hack or dew to misplacement of keys a puzzle. |
|
|
|
Taxation dey also help to grow the economy of a nation no be only production, normally for a working economy wey tax payers money are used to do something meaningful like to work road, health care and others taxation go help to increase the good life of the people, create good employment opportunities and improve the economy because of the level of productivity wey e go generate.
Production get em own side too though na the easiest way wey dey grow economy because in a country wey dey productive dia currency go get value and plenty foreign investors go rush enter the country come invest because them no say everything dey ok for the country but naija na cruise our president just wam use tax payers money for him own selfish interest him no get anything to offer us other than borrowing of funds.
Baba, as long as say na this set of politicians hold power, nothing will ever be managed properly including the tax, the more the tax the more there is available resource for them to siphon into their personal coffers, you think Tinubu is taxing you, just to built a better economic growth, that's far from it. Production builts an economy no doubt about that, since we've not been producing, there is hardly any stuff we've been able to export except crude oil, which is basically done by the Federal government, so you see a lot of ships that import products to the country, instead of them taking products we have from our country and exporting them overseas, you see those ships disembarking from our docks Empty. The tax the government are collecting what have they done with all of it. We do not have good health care model system, the public infrastructures are not to modern global practice, we can not take pride in our electieici distribution system, poor road network, the educational system does not compete in global ranks for a country that is endowed in human and diverse natural resources but dew to fantastically corrupt politicians no results to show for it with all the tax the government collects. Heavy and multiple taxations can not grow an economy, it abnormal and a lie that should not be accepted. Multiple taxations chase away investors and cripple existing investments. Since the regime of Tinubu are you aware of the mega companies that have closed down and some moved to neighbouring countries with simple taxation with a political environment that cut above what we have in the country. With a robust productive economy investors won't depart from the country but more will want to come in live and build. Not what we having from this draconian taxation system |
|
|
|
Lesotho has been given free 3 points, Benin Republic by goals difference are moved top of the group with 14 points as SA. The two matches left to play what the two countries need to qualify is a one win and a draw.
Now, what is the fate of Nigeria winning their two matches to gain 17 points under the circumstance that SA or Benin lost or draw their two matches?
Doesn't matter much but at least the chances of the Super Eagles qualifying directly or playing playoff is now better than it was before the points deduction. The most important thing is we still have Benin Republic to play in what could be a playoff decider in the last fixture. If we're able to take advantage of the Losotho game and score an many goals as possible to increase it our SD score that would give us some kind of advantage of we're able to win our last two remaining games. The points deduction in my opinion does not make the position on the future of Nigeria in qualifying for the 2016 World Cup any better, SA and Benin Republic will comfortably qualify without given Nigeria a hope for direct slot. Playing Benin Republic for the playoff decider is what makes the situation for. Nigeria very bluring, what is the confidence that Nigeria will win Benin Republic of which they look good at winning Lesotho not Benin. |
|
|
|
 Finally, I wonder why it took FIFA this long before doing the needful on this very issue of points deduction from South Africa for fielding an ineligible player against Lesotho few months ago. Lesotho will get 3 points and 3 goals from this rule. Benin Republic now leads the standings, let's see what happens in the remaining matches to be played. The time it took FIFA to make decision on the illegibility case of SA fielding a player in the match with Lesotho do not matter as this points deduction so not favour Nigeria in any form and will not change the grimy position of Nigeria in the group. Lesotho has been given free 3 points, Benin Republic by goals difference are moved top of the group with 14 points as SA. The two matches left to play what the two countries need to qualify is a one win and a draw. Now, what is the fate of Nigeria winning their two matches to gain 17 points under the circumstance that SA or Benin lost or draw their two matches? |
|
|
|
Is there someone else or is it just me that finds a match that only one of the team is playing with the ball. To me, this Real Madrid match that's ongoing is just so boring for, I was falling asleep and waking up at intervals while watching because of the boring nature of the match. I was even expecting lots of goals from Real Madrid. The first half was pretty disappointing because that's not the sore score I had expected with the way they are playing.
Real Madrid will not going to lose this game like the way they loss in the la Liga league game, that is why they don't want to rush their opponent to score more than 1 goal in the 45 minutes. Real Madrid will have to score goals in this match to create that atmosphere of respect from Kairat cause score less than 2 goals in the full match time will make fans suggest they did not play as projected dew to how low their direct win odd was, 1.20 and, not an attractive odd size so gamblers would have gone for over 2.5 and 3.5 goals because it is a match capable of producing much goals. Mbappe has doubled the score to 0-2 and am projecting more 2 goals to that score line before final whistle. |
|
|
|
Nobody discourages you from diversifying, that is buying other assets other than bitcoin, actually you are even encouraged to do that. No smart investor keeps their funds in one investment, you can buy treasury bills, bonds, gold, silver, shares, etc.
That said, what many crypto enthusiasts erroneously regard as diversification is buying bitcoin and then a shitload of shitcoins, that is not diversifying, it is basically a recipe of losing money to those shitcoins you are accumulating. Yes, chance dey say you fit dey lucky, but the chance dey very small, so e better say you just buy bitcoin and other stuffs wey no be crypto, real estate na another good investment.
Diversification is in having a list of other different investments instruments other than different cryptocurrencies what has been mistaken for diversification of investment in this side. Diversification should cut across different financial instruments for it to merit the term and not when an investor is holding bitcoin and buying altcoins as well Your luck on making that buzz profit from shitcoins are 1% to 99% of your loss chances. Na hin make them di tell us no to di hold altcoins for long. You see small profit selling am fast make you no become shitcoins rug victim. |
|
|
|
I myself have been rotating through several casinos many times because, of course, I think I might have bad luck again at the casino where I last lost. Sometimes, that's just what I think.
What everyone should know is that their luck will always be there, no matter the casino they are playing at. In fact, my question to those who constantly switch casinos moving from one to another is this: have they really noticed any changes in their luck after switching?The reasons I might move from one casino to another could be because they are cheating, their site is slow or they have added new features. But apart from these reasons, I hardly switch casinos.Everyone has their own reasons for changing casinos, but personally, I don't really see the point in moving from one casino to another just because of luck.the fact if you win you will still no matter where you are playing the casino. I have made use of a particular casino site for long and was making profit dew to how my lucky was regular at one time from there I began to experience changes with luck and it got so bad that I was making streaks of losses. Moved to another casino with the thought that the results were caused by the first casino I was using, I got frustrated going through same losses in the new casino I moved to. All I did was to take a break for a length of days, came back to the first casino got lucky to win again. What you said reminded me of that experience and there is no lie that outcomes can still remain constant wether we move to another casino when there is no luck on your part. |
|
|
|
|
partners have to know each other as deep as it could be between the them two before marriage to know if they are compatible or not, and it includes having intimacy. Amongst two partners one may have high libido and the other partner might have a low libido, a problem of satisfaction in bed can happen when both partners were not aware of this to know how they can deal with it in marriage. Not having a good sex from your partner dew to a low libido can be problematic.
|
|
|
|
what is the cheapest way of doing this in order to minimise transaction charges?
You are trying to solve a problem that might not be a problem at all. Have you actually checked what the transaction costs are if you transfer BTC directly? Another option you can explore is the Lightning network. As far as I know, both platforms, Kraken and Coinbase, support LN withdrawals and deposits. You have got a point there and I wish the op will heed to it and not make a big deal from what is not. Taking the risk of going through a process you have not done before is not far off from how some persons lost their BTC while avoiding a cost that does not cost an arm and a leg. Op should you insist on using an alternative that is cheap, my tip off is that you first test it with a little as 0.00027 BTC to confirm you doing it right depending on how much BTC you have. |
|
|
|
I believe the concept of HODLing Bitcoin is nearly as old as Bitcoin itself with the fundamental reason and hope that it will increase more in value over the years. Although several persons are entitled to there own reasons for HODLing, could it be that some persons HODL because they are waiting for the perfect time or they are too scared to sell or lose a percentage of their Bitcoin?
It is correct the bitcoin concept of holding is as old as bitcoin itself a fundamental that serves as the core of profit making from bitcoin investment. An investment is without a deliberate calculated plan of how long you will be holding to land at a profitable timing when selling your bitcoin. Selling your bitcoin should not be driven by fud from the market. A perfect time in selling our bitcoin do not practical exist correspondently to when can be accepted as the right time to buy bitcoin. Those that sold their bitcoin when it first moved to $100,000 ATH regretted when bitcoin got passed to $124,000 ATH. In a nutshell, a strategic bitcoin plan can handles all that fears. |
|
|
|
What do you do in such a scenario?
If her property in the US is not confiscated, as you suggested, she should reach out to close contacts there to help retrieve some of her personal belongings, especially the hardware wallets. We rarely think about cases like this, but there are certain unlikely situations that could put our keys at risk. If we don't plan for them, many of us Bitcoin and crypto users could face a significant loss. This is an important consideration for investors who often prefer to live in countries with fewer regulatory concerns and where their human rights are protected. The key is simply to have a backup plan in case an event like this happens. While some might consider using online storage as a solution in this scenario, it's not ideal. It's almost always safer to know your keys were physically left behind somewhere secure than to have them exposed on the internet. This where trust and brainwallet has to be thought out for the persons that have literally turned down as bad the idea of trusting a blood relative with an idea of our keys and it location. A wallet with such value must have to be retrieved by someone we trust right before the nightmare. For a deportee situation a brainwallet will cancel the problem of facing the risk of trusting the wrong person to your wallet. Having stored our bitcoin in a hard wallet and kept in secured physical position, memorising the keys to ensure we can access them anywhere right from our head can be an extra layer for a backup plan preventing a loss not only to deportation scenarios but in fire razed scenarios. |
|
|
|
Has anyone else noticed that these days, having a university degree does not seem to guarantee a good job anymore? In the US, more than 40% of new graduates are working in jobs that don’t even need a degree! In the UK and Canada, youth unemployment is even higher, and entry-level jobs are much harder to get. Now, for each job, there are more than 100 people applying
This established remark is not for professional jobs that are in high demands, data analysts, cyber security, project management courses, and public health courses , conflicts and resolution studies these are the disciplines the 21st century employers are increasingly sourcing for and people with this employability are limited to the demands. Sorry to establish this truth, in this scientifically and technologically advanced world courses like zoology, philosophy, history, anthropology and host of others in their league is a waste of university time in job landing. Lot of courses still studied in the universities are obsolete to present time realities and have to be scrapped, which is there is a need for a reform to universities courses scheme and student on their part must have to research about the present relevance and top courses that can quickly and seamlessly land them a job. |
|
|
|
This weekend the matches results of the big clubs in the premier league are a win for the betting sites and a drenched weekend for the sport betters. Who will have it in mind to give in their tickets that Liverpool, Chelsea and Manchester United will all lose their matches? Crystal palace are the only club in the premier league right now with undefeated run. Similar development in Spain, Real Madrid losing 5:2 to Atletico de Madrid was another shocker iin this weekend matches.
A week for the betting platform indeed. Majority of gamblers with 3 or more parlay may end up losing their bet because of the big teams losing against teams they should have defeated. The surprising one is the Crystal Palace vs Liverpool match, after the equalizer what we expected was final score to be 1:1, provokingly Crystal Palace did a late winner. Is exactly what will happen to parlay betting gamblers and they will pray they had gone for the goals market option and not been too confident on the big teams to win. Newcastle will be rivaling Arsenal on Sunday, another match for over 2.5 goals than picking a side to win. Atletico Madrid is a big club, defeating Madrid 5:2 isn't a surprise knowing Madrid are not competent this season, with an on and off performance playing against another big team will be a problem.
The Madrid derby became a test to Real Madrid form cause through the season they have been playing unmatched clubs and having the victories, Atletico de Madrid match had to expose their lapses. Barcelona is next to their test and that will be a bigger test for Xavi Alonso. |
|
|
|
I feel like people have so much time on their hands these days, and that makes them create so many conspiracy theories for fun.
There were 17 Apollo missions in total. Before Apollo 11, there were Apollo missions 1 through 10. Why wasn't there a fake moon landing in all those missions? Why does it have to be Apollo 11?
There has been no single evidence that the moon landing was fake, just a bunch of theories by conspiracy theorists, just like the one in 2010 when Armstrong was approached by one and forced to put his hand on the bible and swear, a man whom Armstrong did not take seriously.
They then went ahead to say that he was a devout Christian, which is also a lie. He is has a devout Christian mother who wasn't happy with the fact that her son was not a devout Christian. All these are in the book “A Reluctant Icon: Letters to Neil Armstrong”.
There are also lies about how he converted to Islam because he heard a call to prayer on the moon. Ordinarily, these are things people should laugh about and discard immediately, but we live in a world where people still believe that the earth is flat, so I guess I'm not surprised.
All the moon landings were fake. You don't believe that? What do you believe about 9/11? 'They' have such control.  How did they fake all of that for such number of times. What sense does it make. It does not matter what to believe but about proven evidence backing our unbelieve. In 2023 a team of Indian rocket scientists successfully launched a lunar landing after a previous failed mission in 2019, it was an event that was broadcast live. Were they faked too? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandrayaan-2#:~:text=The%20Vikram%20lander%20attempted%20a,successfully%20performed%20a%20lunar%20landing. |
|
|
|
Shocking and surprising results coming up today, earlier on even before the kickoff, I had thought it was going to be a straight win for the champions but Crystal Palace proved most of us wrong. So many tickets will go down all because of Chelsea and Liverpool except maybe one went for over marke or both teams to score. It's only risk takers that can predict the loss of Liverpool and Chelsea this week.
This weekend the matches results of the big clubs in the premier league are a win for the betting sites and a drenched weekend for the sport betters. Who will have it in mind to give in their tickets that Liverpool, Chelsea and Manchester United will all lose their matches? Crystal palace are the only club in the premier league right now with undefeated run. Similar development in Spain, Real Madrid losing 5:2 to Atletico de Madrid was another shocker iin this weekend matches. |
|
|
|
|
The crash from $113,000 in the past days is causing panic that can be felt in the news. With the retracement of bitcoin going to $109, 315 and with the trajectory looking like it will dip further below where price is presently, traders will be careful to observe when right to enter at a strong liquidity area, inversely for long term bitcoin holders it is an advantageous time to double down on bitcoin without any course for observation wether price could dip further.
|
|
|
|
Is it really a big mistake to sell portion of your bitcoin and then rebuy back when the price has dip?
The reason why am asking this question is because with the right approach I think this can also be done and even help you get good value of bitcoin when the price dip but there are conditions that would prompt you to actually sell some fraction of your investment.
It may not be a big mistake but of what difference are you who claims to be a bitcoin investment holder from the retail trader who only buys at dip price waiting to sell when price rise. Are you selling due to emergency (then you are meant to have an emergency funds) or you selling cause there is a price? That the particular approach is appealing to you it can still be not the right approach towards your bitcoin investment when you have to sell a portion of your holdings at every bitcoin price rise to rebuy when it dips. Do you not think you are investing without a proper duration on your investment? You are holding for 6 or 8 years let it be so as planned. Some people don't really understand that getting much benefit from Bitcoin investment is when you accumulate it over time and hold, that's when they'll get better profits, it's the more reason why it requires patience else the idea of waiting for the dip, buy and then sell when the price increases won't be talked against. Yes dear, waiting for the dip to buy then take profit when the price goes up is a traders mentality there's no difference between people who do that and traders, Real investors accumulate bitcoin consistently and hodl it for a very long period cause that's what the concept of Bitcoin investment is all about and nor what traders do. To get the best part of any investment a seasoned investor should be aware that having a king-size of the asset is what will be reflective in your profit and to have such size you have to display patience over time with an aggressive accumulation target. I was of the thought lately that it will be important to emphasize that before people embrace bitcoin they should make research of what characters differentiating a trader and an investor and boldly make a choice if where they want to be, an investor then do what real Investors do, a trader then by all means do what traders do, stop mixing things. |
|
|
|
Is it really a big mistake to sell portion of your bitcoin and then rebuy back when the price has dip?
The reason why am asking this question is because with the right approach I think this can also be done and even help you get good value of bitcoin when the price dip but there are conditions that would prompt you to actually sell some fraction of your investment.
It may not be a big mistake but of what difference are you who claims to be a bitcoin investment holder from the retail trader who only buys at dip price waiting to sell when price rise. Are you selling due to emergency (then you are meant to have an emergency funds) or you selling cause there is a price? That the particular approach is appealing to you it can still be not the right approach towards your bitcoin investment when you have to sell a portion of your holdings at every bitcoin price rise to rebuy when it dips. Do you not think you are investing without a proper duration on your investment? You are holding for 6 or 8 years let it be so as planned. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
