good grief
has WO fallen so far so soon? or has it been taken over?
its like a 1st cycle "crypto bros club" in here: "im not selling!! you selling??" "dont worry!!!!!!" "HoLD/HlOD/HOLD strong brother!!!" oooonlyeeee UUUUUP from here!
pfft
just look at the OGs here in this thread. theyre the ones snoozing through this whole thing and talking about the weather, haikus and rusty pipes. we are not worried.
These days I am really bored by people opening whole book clubs on single day % movements. Asking why it is going up or why it is going down. It is like you'd ask me why it is raining today and sunny tomorrow? Normal weather behavior, normal market behavior. Don't people have nothing better to do? Life is so precious and so short.. It is even funnier because it is most likely this was because the GDP numbers were revised up. Economy doing better? Dump! And had they revised it down... economy doing worse? Also dump!! Funny because it is just standard September behavior as with most years but some are panicking and others are writing a university thesis on why the price moved. 
|
|
|
Those 4 years cycle was already broken. The current price movement is already doesn’t follow that cycle imho.
Not true. Just put the charts one over the other and the price still largely follows the trend from the previous cycle. September was not a good month, the following months were good. Based on the second cycle, there was a short term with this date and then the price surge after next few months. It's not yet broken, to be precise, we don't know what will happen in the next few months.
The next months have to be bearish for the cycle to be broken or the other options is that we don't enter a new bear market in 2026. The second thing is an emerging possibility with the ETFs and institutional investors. That would be a positive change though.
|
|
|
Any form of borrowing, under any circumstances, and for any reason, can never be justified as investment capital.
This is not correct. The rich have been using borrowing/leverage to get richer for a very long time now, borrowing is not bad, it is how you do it and for what reason you take the loan. If you have funds in other appreciating assets, it is much better to take a loan for a new investment or business, than selling your assets. You not only save yourself from paying capital gain tax, but you use your existing assets to borrow and invest, so you are still generating money from your initial investment and your new venture. Sometimes I really can't believe what people are writing here. I ask myself can someone really think that? Borrowing is used for investment capital all the time. In fact capital investment is the most common reason for borrowing money in the world, by governments, by institutions, by companies, and by the rich. That said, it has to be done right. It has to be low-interest loans and you must do your due diligence on the new investment or business you want to get into. The idea of investing with "idle cash" is flawed and you can never get rich doing that.
As I said as long as the plan is to repay using your standard means of income and not from the business venture or investment there is nothing too dangerous about it. The poorer complain of the rich but you can see in the example of this thread that they are not able to even have an understanding of the basic tools that the rich use regularly.
|
|
|
Every poster who thinks he's able to predict the behavior of wealthy people is declaring his/her ignorance about the subject. Hardly everyone is thinking a little further, I wonder why?
What to expect from the lowest denominator of the poor? If they knew things, they wouldn't be poor. If all else fails they can always blame inheritance and demand communistic redistribution.  Poor is poor because he doesn't know how to steal. Some of the rich can avoid from paying a lot of taxes why because they know how to avoid but on the other hand poor can't because in some countries they pays before gets the payment. I'm not blaming rich people I'm blaming the system if everyone follows this path then everythink can be collapse. No common education, healt, safety system will work as must be.
This has nothing to do with it. Theft is something that is defined by the law. The rich people are not stealing things, in the topic of taxes that would be tax fraud and usually it ends up wrong. The really rich do not need to commit tax fraud, those is usually done by the less powerful and smart. The really rich buy their exemptions and then legally pay less. Actually now that you bring up theft, depending on the company type poor people are stealing a lot. They just aren't smart and never use their stolen money to improve their situation. I know for a fact that in the construction business the workers steal a lot.
|
|
|
If someone says their will be an altcoins that will outperform Bitcoin then I will have to laugh out loud because Bitcoin Cash tried buy failed, Ethereum tried still failed. I am wondering what will be the next altcoin that will like to try again but non could be able to meet up. The altcoins market is big due to so many CEOs creating good and bad coins so investors will pump their money on them. Their are still hold altcoins to buy and hold that will be profitable for all but many investors don't see these altcoins as a potential project to hold. Many want to make quick money from the market and that's why they rely on buying pump and dump projects.
Wait a minute, what are you talking about? What other attempts to buy Bitcoin Cash or Ethereum do you have in mind? Tell us in more detail who bought them when, at what rate and in what volume. And then maybe we'll have a laugh together.  I guess he's confusing price performance with a different meaning of outperform as in overtake and become better or bigger than Bitcoin. Most of the respondents don't even understand basic English. The price performance thing is not really a smart topic. You can pick many two points of time and make it so that some of the largest shitcoins like Ethereum gained a larger return in percentage than Bitcoin. To even try to do this or to think that this has meaning just shows that the person is stupid. Comparing a mountain to a speck of dust and being amazed that it is easier to double the speck of dust in size than it is to double the mountain. WOW, fantastic. Truly amazing information. Who could have known that you need a lot more material to double the mountain WOW. Congratulations future Einsteins.
|
|
|
Snip
You are missing the point, read my previous post. What the law says is useless when there are many exceptions using certain structures. All of the tax loopholes were created by politicians for the rich people. This de facto makes it a tax exemption. They paid, they got what they needed and now they are using it. Instead of the whining about loopholes for decades, they would be closed otherwise. It is very easy to close most of the loopholes but they don't want to. The last I checked I didn't quote you, telling me to read your post is what I don't get, except you are not telling me something. I wonder why another person will create thread while another person is taking it up seriously than the op. Good way to dodge admitting you are wrong like most people who responded to this thread. OP did not respond to this thread again so anyone who responds is taking it up seriously.  The fact of the matter is that the rich have exempt themselves from taxes. There is no debate there. Some users even responded that the rich pay more taxes. Funny to see poor people defending the system and the rich, everything is working exactly as designed.
|
|
|
But don't overdo it. People might think that diversifying a lot will save their portfolios. It's also a matter of what kind of altcoins are you going to choose. So, therefore as you diversify, make sure that you choose the altcoins that you're going to diversify with because if not, you're doing the wrong thing about it. While it can truly cover the losses that you'll get from the other altcoins, but sometimes it will also get you the most losses if not wise in choices.
You are not diversifying anything by investing in shitcoins. I have explained it in my previous post. Diversifying from human feces to cat feces and dog feces is not really a diversification away from feces, is it? Instead of 1 type of poop all you have done is become a proud owner of 3 types of poop.
|
|
|
I don't think that's true, but if it's true then it could be some few rich guys that can do that, because majority of rich guys even pay higher tax according to their level of investment in such country. although there could be some rich loan evaders who has not been noticed by the government or tax agencies but I believe this rich folks could be among the currupt Rich people who pay their way out. I believe in most currupt countries the rich always have their way of boycotting the law since they have money. But we can not use that to generalize All rich people to assume they are tax evaders.
By definition, tax is a mandatory contribution intended for the benefit of the state and its citizens. If it's mandatory, there are no exceptions, including for the wealthy or non-wealthy who meet the requirements for taxation. I don't know the exact details of tax rates and implementation in every country, but basically, once the requirements are met, anyone, regardless of their social class, must pay taxes.
Wealthy individuals who don't pay taxes are considered illegal, although I don't deny that such groups exist in every country, and they usually try to avoid taxes through various means.
You are missing the point, read my previous post. What the law says is useless when there are many exceptions using certain structures. All of the tax loopholes were created by politicians for the rich people. This de facto makes it a tax exemption. They paid, they got what they needed and now they are using it. Instead of the whining about loopholes for decades, they would be closed otherwise. It is very easy to close most of the loopholes but they don't want to. It is not true that wealthy people don't pay taxes. They pay more taxes than the poor. Most countries use the Progressive system of taxation. This means the more you earn, the higher the percentage of tax you pay on your income. There is also the regressive tax system, where everybody pays a flat rate no matter what they earn.
How naive can you be? Do you believe everything that the news tells you too? The rich pay more taxes, good one. 
|
|
|
But you are missing the point too, the one who is taking a loan will be hoping to make profits from the capital and pay back the loan so there is no plan B if bitcoin crashed which is what I am raising what it is. An average middle-class joe spends his entire life savings to pay the mortgage for the house he wanted to have and if the plan fails then this is another trap that may end the dream of getting finanical freedom which is why I said it is no different and we need to follow the process save=>invest=>ROI=>loop so even if the growth looks small that comes with no risk and you don't realise the power of compouding which makes it much bigger in the longer run.
But not everyone is like that! I think the least informed people approach taking loans like that. If you take a loan to buy Bitcoin and which you plan to pay back with Bitcoin that is an extreme risk. That is not the correct way to do it. You take out a loan which you invest in whatever but you plan to pay it back with your regular salary. If you get lucky with your investment then paying back the loan becomes easier. If not then it just returns to the originally planned way. I gave an example in my post how some people that I know did it. Yeah, they don't sound like they have experience. I even have some friends who took loans and went into failed shitcoin investments. What about it? They are just paying back the loan as regularly as they planned and hopefully they learned their lesson about shitcoins.  As long as you approach the loan the correct way nothing catastrophic will happen. We know Bitcoin is a volatile currency so one should not take a loan to invest in Bitcoin. If taking a loan, you will have the pressure to repay the loan and also pay high interest, which can be difficult for you to hold the investment for a long time. And there is no guarantee that you will benefit, so it may be that you may need to sell the investment at a loss to repay the loan. So don't regret the past, always focus on the future. However, if you want to invest in Bitcoin then you can invest in DCA method from your income instead of taking loan. Finally, don't invest more money than you can afford to lose.
Very wrong. The interest rate which you have to pay has nothing to do with Bitcoin or any pressure. These days interest rates are good and getting better unless you have a terrible credit rating, but that is on you.
|
|
|
why is it that the wealthy ones usually exempt from paying taxes? when you are rich, you can basically pay no taxes and it will not be considered illegal exactly. you will not be filed a case if you avoid paying taxes no matter how. sometimes you are even exempt like for example living in uae or in monaco, the wealthiest people do not need to be paying taxes. but why is that? aren't the wealthy ones supposed to be paying more? instead it is the ones from middle class or lower that are paying so much for taxes
A good part of a deep red pilling process with Bitcoin is the realization that most of the things in the world are completely broken and backwards. is there a reason why the rich are the ones that can escape taxes?
Corruption through power. @mindrust answered correctly, the rich have more options, hence they can escape from taxes.
And who created these options and why are they not closed? Because the rich bribe the politicians to create laws that give them options. That's all there is to it. They essentially paid to get tax exemptions. Just because there is no direct law that talks about exemptions it does not mean that they didn't effectively manage to do that. A lot of the people in this thread are wasting time talking about the fact that there is no real exemption. Most of the ways of avoiding taxes for the rich are known and they are easily shut down but nobody is doing it. Have you not understood the world yet? You can pay to get almost anything as long as you have enough money.
|
|
|
Of course, not all are legit. Is that something new?
The same as: -Not all DeFi projects are legit -Not all node test projects are legit -Not all crypto P2Es are legit -Not all TGE and airdrops are legit
But it doesn't mean these are all doom. At the right time, we can possibly hunt few more good and worth working with.
I have yet to find a good one with a real business case and demand in the real world. Usually what I am told is a good DePin project is because someone already invested in it or was farming it or read some influencer crap on Twitter. What good DePin projects are out there according to you? Name them. DYOR. Don't be bitter. If you don't have any examples to give, I don't see why you would argue that there are good ones. Empty words?
|
|
|
^ Mmmmm... About the crap tokenomics bit, that could be true. But is CZ really shilling this only to sell on his followers? That's not how he operates. I know there are lots of shenanigans in Binance, but has CZ explicitly shilled a coin or token just to dump?
Yes, they are the standard make the founder rich and print tokens mercilessly tokenomics. Much worse when compared to BNB or CAKE. I don't think he has done this before. The only token he has been shilling is BNB. A token which he has never dumped on his followers.
He has not as far as I am aware which makes this whole ordeal weird for me. As for the "nothing to do with it" thing, check the info in the starting post. YZi Labs, formerly Binance Labs, is a seed investor in AsterDEX.
I think we didn't understand each other. What I meant was that the way Cz posted about Aster on Twitter it came off as if he had zero involvement in it. Something like here look what this team has done, it is amazing work, congratulations. That was my first impression of it, but here I found out that he is involved in it.
|
|
|
People even started taking loans for their honeymoon and things but that's not my point here.
You are missing the point, those comparisons are the point that he is trying to make. Otherwise why mention people taking out loans to buy a car? It is not relevant to the question unless he wants to make direct comparisons. What if the bitcoin price crashes after the loan is that person capable of paying it back along with the interest?
Nothing? You are not paying back the loan from the invested Bitcoin. You should never take out a loan that you can't pay back in any case so there is no problem here. Worst case the money is lost and you pay back the loan as originally planned. The whole world practically runs on debt, and people here shy away from it like it will instantly ruin your life. This does not say good things about the experience of users here. Investing our money is smart choice rather than spending it but I don't have the same opinion if someone is taking loan and want to invest.
As I said, there is nothing wrong with this compared to the most reasons why loans are taken. It is much better than most of those reasons. Don't make it out to be something that it is not. However, I feel that many people in the thread are making it sound worse than it is. There has to be context before giving suggestions in things like this. First of all, do you have a means to pay back if the investment fails? If you invest in Bitcoin and it crashes, do you have a means (income from your job or business) to completely pay off the debt over time without wrecking your financial life?
Yeah, they don't sound like they have experience. I even have some friends who took loans and went into failed shitcoin investments. What about it? They are just paying back the loan as regularly as they planned and hopefully they learned their lesson about shitcoins. 
|
|
|
Will ASTER moon like HYPE? We'll see...  It has potential but this is just another case of crap tokenomics that are oriented towards enriching the founders. Really this space needs to set new standards where the least amount of tokens goes to the team behind a project. ^ Lol. Nice to have a win for once after a long string of duds.  So far HYPE has been my biggest winner for the current bull market and the only one that matters. Had decent win with PUMP but not like HYPE. So now the focus is on ASTER. Let's see how far CZ takes this one. The thing that ASTER has it going for it is Binance spot listing and an implementation for a flywheel like HYPE. I'm more sure of the former than the latter tho. Good luck out there guys. I am sad that I joined the HYPE party late, but I am not sad about ASTER. I don't like organized and shady pumping like this. He should have disclosed in his tweet his involvement. It sounded like he had nothing to do with it and is genuinely impressed by some third party making this a thing.
|
|
|
I usually buy from my friend with 0 % fee but after I read this post I will never buy from him again never thought that thought that those things can happen it's seems it's better to buy btc from binance and avoid those kind of problems
If he would do something like this to you, he was never your friend. P2P trades are much better than using any platform. Only people who value themselves as persons at $0 would argue in favor of KYC platforms. Don't be spooked by these stories, they are the definition of FUD.
|
|
|
Of course, not all are legit. Is that something new?
The same as: -Not all DeFi projects are legit -Not all node test projects are legit -Not all crypto P2Es are legit -Not all TGE and airdrops are legit
But it doesn't mean these are all doom. At the right time, we can possibly hunt few more good and worth working with.
I have yet to find a good one with a real business case and demand in the real world. Usually what I am told is a good DePin project is because someone already invested in it or was farming it or read some influencer crap on Twitter. What good DePin projects are out there according to you? Name them.
|
|
|
Despite those beautiful lines about the benefits of investing in altcoins, you have left out the most important advise you can give to anyone who wants to invest in altcoins which is to invest only what they can afford to lose. Most of the altcoins are not worth investing and the rate at which altcoins fail leaves nothing to desire. Altcoins can give big profits or big loss, hence it should never been followed with greed, just ensure you follow the rules of not getting overinvested in altcoins.
I find it funny how most shitcoiners and naive retail ignore the fact that the failure rate in the altcoin world is 99.999%.
|
|
|
~ Would you take a $50K bank loan to invest in Bitcoin today?
Nope. Taking a loan and investing in Bitcoin is just double the risk. Disagreed. You completely missed his point. Most people are taking out loans for all stupid stuff like a new car. You don't need a new car that you can't afford. So if pretty much everyone is doing this for stupid stuff why should he not take out a loan and do something smarter with it like invest in Bitcoin? You need to look at the loan data for the average person in the US. To make things worse they even tend to owe money at the worst possible rates like credit card debt. So here’s my question Would you take a $50K bank loan to invest in Bitcoin today? Or is this just deja-vu waiting to go wrong?
If you are aware of the risk and are able to get a good deal on the loan and this will not bankrupt you under any circumstance, go for it. Please keep in mind that the investment can be lost and that if you want to have good prospects of winning you need to stay here long-term. I know a few people who did this with shitcoins and they lost money but they repaid their loans without issue. I also know some people who did it with Bitcoin and they for sure don't regret it.  So here’s my question Would you take a $50K bank loan to invest in Bitcoin today? Or is this just deja-vu waiting to go wrong?
It is a bad call to consider taking a loan to invest. In your head, you may feel that it is a good idea with a very good chance of success, but there are a thousand things that could go wrong, and you will surely regret it. Nonsense emotional voodoo from someone who does not know how to trade or invest. This has nothing to do with a bad call.
|
|
|
The benefit of playing the lottery is that you could win the lottery? Are you for real?  People these days don't even know the basics of anything. Just because you are buying another altcoin and now own 2 instead of 1 does not mean that you have diversified anything. You are gambling. This is not diversification. If it were, then selling some of your altcoin to buy lottery tickets is also a diversification. Altcoins gives room for diversification: In cryptocurrency investment, diversification is very important as it enables you to spread your risk among various cryptocurrency ,should in case any one did not do well, you can cover up with other ones.
Diversifying from human feces to cat feces and dog feces is not really a diversification away from feces, is it? Instead of 1 type of poop all you have done is become a proud owner of 3 types of poop.
|
|
|
Outperform Bitcoin? How many altcoins have to so while not dumping too hard in the Bear market? If there are any, there are very few
There is a time when majority of the altcoins will out perform Bitcoin and that phase is for a very short time and it is usually at the end of the bull cycle. We can track this through the Altcoin Season Index. I know altcoins that pumped so hard in the previous cycle but may not a hit a new all-time high in this current cycle. All I am saying is trade smart and avoid being a bag holder of some shitcoins that may just dump on you and may never rise again. Most of them are just seasonal.
As per my experience, most of the altcoins that were in the previous cycle may not reach all time high again and the reason for this is that retail is holding those altcoins at high prices and there is too much selling pressure and it may need a lot of volume to get to those levels. However, the good altcoins that are launched in this season (within the previous 3 to 4 years) have a greater potential of breaking their all time highs. This is completely meaningless. Read my post on page 1. They never outperformed Bitcoin, and they never will. You can artificially inflate the % return on any project by inducing a multi tiered strategy of manipulation: 1) Start with low MC. 2) Massive centralization of supply. 3) Collusion with market makers and VCs to drain the limited liquid supply from retail. 4) Pump with little resistance. 5) Sell at retail who later lose money. Of course if you compare a small shitcoin to a $2 trillion dollar asset then the percentage return of the small shitcoin has a bigger chance of being better. That does not mean it is better in any way or that anything is guaranteed. If you believe otherwise you should go trade penny stocks. You will definitely become rich.  We call most altcoins pump and dump or dump and dump. It has a reason. See this latest pump and dump coin:
The tiniest percentage of altcoins do not have terrible price performance. Everything that is doing fine is just survivorship bias. For every 1 project that is doing good price wise there are thousands and thousands that went to the gutter. Not only that I will prefer bitcoin dominance, bitcoin is also not pump and dump or dump and dump. Bitcoin is an appreciative asset and a store of value, unlike altcoins.
Even the dominance metric is fake and the real dominance is more than 90%. You can do this cherry picking with penny stocks and find stocks that outperform the best stocks like Apple. What good does this picking do for you? What does it prove? Nothing. The fact is if you drew an average of all altcoin performance and compared that to Bitcoin you would see extreme under performance. In the best analytical way having and altcoins index statistics of 90 is somewhat going to be a false narrative as some coins like BNB have recently increased and improved it performance that have dragged them higher on the current chart so going by friendly ecosystem and market capitalization we may likely run into problems following the charts quoted above, the best approach is to do a thorough individual research and check all indexes then come up with your final outcome using this chart also.
It seems that you can open training courses for money, where you will teach other people how to write a lot of words, but not say anything specific... What do you see as false in these statistics? You used BNB as an example, so what's wrong with it? I checked and found out that over the past few months, BNB blockchain has gone through several updates and the fees have become lower; as well as the danger from the regulator towards Binance has become less. But the most important thing is that the course has grown, and in the context of this topic, the reasons are not important at all. So why is this statistic false? BNB is one of the best and most generous projects in the altcoin space, one of the least scammy ones definitely. His post does not make any sense.
|
|
|
|