are there going to be competitive aspects to this or is it going to be more like 2nd life?

when u hit the detail bar with your thumb - it drops down the addresses to copy/past/etc (sorry for bad quality ... just had paint)

it might make sense to put the pic of group participants or whatever underneath the input box.  reading and typing out replies would be next to each other instead of split up by an inch.

having to move your eyes as little as possible while in a chat convo seems like good ui design.

just my .02

it would be pretty badass to allow people to set up betting taverns around NFL sunday, soccer matches etc in this game.

why does it make sense to "defend" if the goal is new users?

some people are more likely to buy at 135 (value driven) and some people are more likely to buy at 600 (hype driven).  you want to attract both types ... why artificially set ANY price if ur goal is adoption?

don't you think your money would be better spent "defending" after a massive surge pushing it down to new lows?  there are TONS of coins hitting the market every day (one days worth = a MASSIVE selloff)

it's easier to soak up and "defend" if it goes lower.  plus more adoption.


overinflated pothead; much butthurt i sense in you

because according to rptellia - a little drop in price or it not going up like he thinks it should = destroying o.O

in honor of this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=771925.100 i open it up for discussion.

https://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/poloniex/xmrbtc

is monero destroyed 

sidechains aren't a threat to what monero wants to be / envisions itself as which is another bitcoin.

so yea ... guess i can see where ur coming from.  still say sidechains are a legit threat to all altcoins.  except that bitcoin moves so slow and is so political that it will never happen.  until another altcoin probably completely overtakes bitcoin and it's too late.

the blocknet is like a network.  what you are looking at in that link is a programming language implimented into a coin.  it would make more sense to put that on xcurrency than the blocknet.

whales give and whales take away.

somebody must have read the sidechains article.  or maybe moolah dude finally figured out how to operate an xmr wallet.

in my opinion there is a year of bleeding on this coin.  or at least six months.  just let it happen lord and savior jesuschristrptellia.

many tears - maybe if it gets dumped hard enough it will attract enough people to become an alt someday instead of just a holiersmarterthanthou circlejerk among early bitcoiners giving blowjobs to each other.

this is one thing I don't get.  my assumption with the other one (supernet? all out scam by jl777 dude to let him offload his assets wout tanking the market) was that this was why they were getting 10% of the coins to somehow have like a ripple effect of those 10% of coins always being available.

Put in coin A at current coin A/B price -> do coin B stuff with coin B that net owns -> exchange back for coin A without having to go to the exchanges.  it still seems like they'd run ou of popular coins and have too many of unpopular coins.  

but it gets really fuzzy in my head.  


I don't have a lot of patience or tolerance for bullshit.  And prefer to get down to brass tax.

Lol.  supply and demand people's - no grand conspiracy.

Whales is only why it was ever worth more than .001 at such a young age.  whales give and whales take away.

somebody read about altchains and got scared off.

whales and 20K xmr a day is a bitch peoples o.O

where's the xmr knight in shining armor at?  lol!


ha!  that "dump" was 1 days worth of xmr emissions.  how about big dump, more slow bleeding, bigger dump

Dude.  that's exactly what he said.


Reading comprehension?

Which is why you have a circle jerk going on in your thread rather than productive discussion.  & you have a very critical public facing thread in the more visited area of the forums.

Gotta keep the circlejerk going to keep people from dumping.  But on the other hand - the issue of not actually accepting negativity has forced it elsewhere.  Which keeps new money out of XC.

Funny how I always look for unmoderated threads if I'm contemplating an altcoins legitimacy now.  Why would I come "alongside" a community?  Truth doesn't come alongside anybody.  It sits there like an elephant in the room and pisses people off as they howl in pain at lost retirement accounts while Enron drops form $200 a share to .20.

Let me FTFY


When people are trying to raise money for an IPO involving (some) scamcoins - pardon my skepticism and lack of constructive criticism. 

Open source the project you took premine money for.  Bulletproof it, make it multi platform.  And you'll find me less of an antagonist.

Try to raise a million dollars money by joining shitcoins + scamcoins + one or two legit coins when you refuse to open source your current project?  Yeah ... sorry.  I'll be honest about how I feel.

I was speaking specifically to where the (more) objective audience (those who are willing to tolerate open free speech about a subject) can be found.

Bringing God into the subject as the only one who can be objective, and bringing manners up to try and defend censoring relevant talking points (not pure trolling) is cute.  You are good at re-directing  into a philosophical debate to take focus off the issue at hand.  No doubt you have a collection of Fedoras, roast your own coffee, buy organic & like raw tea so kudos to you smartie pants.

I'm more of a cigar, whiskey & bottom line type of guy with a nose for bullshit who doesn't care for practical discussions being sidetracked by pointless philosophical talking points.

@Revelation - I would recommend this thread if you want to speak objectively, not be censored & have the audience of the entire altcoin section rather than just those who frequent the XC thread.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=830893.0

I'm sorry.  But without actual code review by the community - I don't care what factors from the outside looking in are used to measure the supposed "anoniminity" of a coin.  It isn't enough.  It's like a code review of 400,000 lines of code by one developer in six hours.

Sure.  He looked at it.  But regardless of his experience level - it proves nothing about the security or trustworthiness of the coins claims.  How many "code reviews" and external factors have been looking for exploits in Windows?   Even with thousands of developers spending millions of man hours "code reviewing" it - it STILL isn't secure.

Software that needs to be secure (in this case anoniminity needs to be secure) is not considered so until it's open sourced.  Period.


Stop it with the FUD accusations.  Legitimate concerns are NOT FUD.  Saying "I have the best anoniminity technology on the market.  Even though my coin is 20th on the market cap and I haven't open sourced it yet - just trust me" is MUCH more misleading than the "FUD" you accuse us of.  How about we just drop the terms FUD & SHILL and hold each other accountable to try & discover the truth about any given coin / technology?


Again.  Until it's open sourced no one knows.  I have a hunch that it's probably modified code.  Or terrible with lots of holes.  Because the fact that your coin is 20th on the market cap with like 4 legit contenders - some of which have passed you in the last three month period while your coin has continued to fall.  Screams that you need legitimacy more than you need other coins to not clone you.  So the "I don't want clones" doesn't really hold water.

Again.  Lets worry about the truth - not what paints who in a bad light.  The BlockNET is including coins with developers who in the past have left "investors" out to dry by promising technology and then delivering far far less.  Then move on to the next promised project / pump.

I view this as no less than a scam.  The fact that you are working with these developers to try and bring value to both their coin and your coin makes you "involved" with these coins, no?

In fact - haven't you kinda made a living by selling the "legitimacy" of XC to pump other coins?  Isn't that all this is - just on a much bigger scale?

http://xc-official.com/xcurrency-code-reviews-the-de-facto-standard-of-legitimacy-among-altcoins.html

You're using the fact that you can create pump on small coins as a marketing technique?  The reality / truth looks more like this

http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/halcyon/

From the linked article.


This is another way of saying "Dans primary focus will be on BlockNET"

How can you say "Blocknet is a genius idea worth 2500 bitcoins.  And will take a genius to build.  And that genius is Dan.  But it won't slow down XC (Dan's current primary project) at all?"

Damn dude.  That's pretty insane.  I've seen you do nothing but post slightly concerned alternate opinions.

Got a feeling they're getting desperate - I don't know why but I'm almost convinced they are.  If i was a betting man - I'd say they used the blocknet announcements to buy up worthless coins before adding them to the blocknet list then dump

XC has dumped like 20% since the announcement and I just have this gut feeling that someone out there could knock it down 50%.  

The problem is there are no buyers for closed sourced anon.  There is too much competition.  the reality is that if there is legit code - the danger is MUCH MORE of becoming obsolete / having the shit dumped out of you than being cloned.