It does not.

2 PH = 2000 TH = 2000000 GH = 2000000000 MH = etc... You get the idea.

Lets not propagate the sillyness of the computer-storage world where standard metric quantities are mutilated to the nearest power of 2. It's all neat powers of 10 in the SI unit system, like it's supposed to be.

I'm pretty sure the CoinTerra team is legit, though I have no idea what asxproject.com is or was and stuff related to that.

Why? I assume: "If Dr. Naveed Sherwan is legit and involved in CT, CoinTerra is legit also".

1. He is a team member and there is reference to Open Silicon:
http://cointerra.com/team/

2. Open Silicon is huge:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-Silicon

3. He is CEO of OS:
http://www.open-silicon.com/management/

4. The "proof" that Mr. Sherwan is indeed involved in CT:
http://www.youtube.com/K199f61n4qM?t=2m27s

At the time of delivery customers may be offered an option to upgrade their TerraMiner for a small charge, further lowering the cost per Gigahash.

Don't forget that you can transfer your order to the lower price point batch 2 unit "for a small fee!"

Thanks for the feedback, XYZ.
Have an Awesome Day!
CoinTerra support

+1 for this since i got the latest version

EDIT: this still isn't fixed in the latest version... just a heads up.

I get an LP call then constant "writing to database" messages.
renders my miner useless until i restart bithopper
occurs every 30 minutes approximately for me.

@echo off
set DELAY=1800
set PYTHON_IM=python.exe
set PYTHON_PATH=c:\Python27\python.exe
set BH_PATH=d:\c00w-bitHopper\bitHopper.py

:loop
echo Restarting BitHopper....
taskkill /T /IM %PYTHON_IM%
start %PYTHON_PATH% %BH_PATH%
echo Waiting %DELAY% sec...
ping 127.0.0.1 -n %DELAY% >nul
goto :loop

OMG, look at slush's block #7543:

w.  When they do steal blocks they submit them under their private wallet, not through their pool.

I think the reasons are 1. That would take some effort, 2. Math fail (such as the below-mentioned pool op not believing that pool hoppers reduce earnings, and me being unable to communicate with him in the language of integral calculus and binomial statistics, since he's working at a hosting company at the age I was studying engineering), 3. User resistance (typical PPLNS conversion discussion: "I don't like the idea of my shares expiring..."), and 4. Greed - hopping doesn't reduce the earnings of pool ops, just the users, and more block solves = more fees they get to keep.

...

I am referring to the instability and extra work that hoppers create for pool operators and their users. I happen to know several network problems at bitcoins.lc were from pool hoppers, specifically from hundreds of connections a second being opened by the multipool op and other unknown actors, essentially DDOSing the pool. Jine had to implement firewall caching because of the load the constant stat-refreshing was causing, and had to switch over to to a VM environment with load distribution between six different servers, because proxied and aggregated connections were not re-using TCP sessions properly and would run pushpoold out of TCP/IP ports and crash the pool for all the users. That I might be bitter about, along with having to switch my higher aggression mining tasks to a PPLNS pool instead of my first choice, to avoid earning measurably less.

I do somewhat agree that the game is flawed if you have to kick out the card counters. However, you aren't taking from the house, you are taking from other miners in a situation where the ideal would be that we pool our resources for the good of all. My response is to the self-justifying posts every few pages of this thread that "pools should be glad, we help them solve blocks", or "xxx pool is unscrupulous a-holes because they are taking measures against pool hopping".

This is what you are doing to bitcoin and pools. The goal of pools is not directly to "solve blocks", and saying that pool hoppers "help solve blocks" is a straw-man argument. A pool is there for bitcoin miners to pool their resources to reduce variability and get more regular payments. Miners do not pool mine to make more or less money, they pool mine to make the same expected amount, but not have to wait months for a payout. Having a bunch of opportunists jump on and saying we "help solve blocks" is merely a convenient and fallacious excuse for stealing the early shares in pool rounds that are compensated more because of the chance of a short round happening, in an otherwise fair payment system for full-time miners. You think your work should be paid more than everybody else's? You think everyone else's earnings should be decreased because the short rounds (that should compensate full-time miners for the long ones they suffer) are exploited? It is fair to hit the bandwidth of a dozen pools web pages every minute and open a bunch of TCP sockets, causing pool ops to need hardware upgrades and spend time with mitigation measures? You think pools want more variability - shorter short rounds and longer long rounds? That is an antisocial narcissistic notion.

Pool hoppers do decrease the earnings of everyone else in pools, and on bitcoin as a whole. Hoppers aren't adding more hashrate to bitcoin, they are just strategically moving around their share submissions to be compensated more for the same amount of work, more than others. This leaves less earnings for others on a pool, and less earnings for all bitcoin users. Legitimate pool miners have less time to submit shares in short rounds, and then they have to split those earnings with more people.

It is game on, pools that still prefer the proportional payment method should do whatever in their power makes their pool mining experience a positive one, including not having egocentrists degrade a fair rewards system and network stability.