Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 09:20:03 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][MEOW] KittehCoin Relaunch IS HERE!!!! on: November 18, 2014, 09:10:38 AM
Quote from: HappyHogan on November 17, 2014, 01:26:05 PM
Quote from: CheekyChappy on November 17, 2014, 12:42:12 PM
What will happen with Kitteh?
It will go to the moon, as king of crypto
I've seen this kind of conversation played out a million times on bitcoin talk. A whole bunch of people claiming their coin is different because it has feature X and people want/need feature X.  Usually, feature X is either hyped, doesn't work the way its supposed to, or doesn't even exist, and the "people" usually does not go further than the small band of loyalists who just want to see their coin go up in value.
2  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: ZeroVert - First Zerocoin Implementation | New gold standard for privacy on: November 07, 2014, 09:25:55 PM
Quote from: zerovert on November 07, 2014, 03:43:28 AM
giveaway sent!
Hi, I did re-tweet since the day before yesterday.
Excuse my ignorance but how do I get free coins by re-tweeting ?
Oh, and the wallet is crashing, no matter if I uninstall it and install it again.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
3  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: CRYPTSY STAKES POS COINS (XST)!!!!!! EXPOSED! w/ links on: October 19, 2014, 08:37:46 PM
BitJohn mullick and Spoetnik, you have prepared answers for everything, the problem is that your answers are matching only partially.
BitJohn is blaming a xst "bug" (which by the way is total BS) mullick partially admits that they should have followed the documentation in proper manner and Spoetnik says that BitJohn is "spot on".
The real facts are that no other exchange had this problem and if they had any, certainly it didn't take them weeks to fix it and the xst accounts were not frozen for so long.
Second you claim to know where the problem is for 2-3 days now...and still xst is frozen along with the wallets.
This looks more like you've been staking xst coins in your wallet and you linked users accounts to that wallet and all the mess is solely your own fault.
I have no problem with you staking that coins (I don't know how ethical is that) but at list stop blaming XST for this mess and take all the blame on yourself as you should from the beginning.
There is no need for me to prove my words. The prove is out there. No exchange has this huge problem with XST, but you, meaning that you are the only exchange that messed up things and there must be a reason for that known only by you.
Not even at this moment you are able to say when the wallets will be back. All you give is ambiguous answers.
4  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: CRYPTSY STAKES ALL POS COINS!!!!!! EXSPOSED! on: October 18, 2014, 06:53:28 PM
Quote from: BitJohn on October 18, 2014, 06:33:35 PM
"Some coins have bugs where even when you turn staking off they stake (XST)"

So let me get this right. This thing is not happening at Trex, but is happening only at Cryptsy, also the wallet is broke for a week, and is XST's fault ?
And hey if I turn my wallet's staking off it won't stake.
Cool!
5  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [SDC] Shadow | 1st OS Stealth Address | iOS+Android Staking | PoS-SPV | HTML5 on: October 18, 2014, 08:36:28 AM
Quote from: Viper1 on October 18, 2014, 08:20:21 AM
Quote from: Bolomir on October 18, 2014, 08:10:16 AM
WE, all the others seem to have been happy of joining the Blocknet.

You are absolutely and positively wrong there.
OK Viper. It seems that you know the "absolute" number of  pro and against Blocknet.
I'm only looking at the facts.
1. The dev announces the joining of Blocknet.
Two big holders complain and make a lot of noise threatening to dump their coins. One of them is a known manipulator of the crypto market.
2. The dev comes and make another announcement: We are out of the Blocknet.
What's next ? If Pookie and Longshort changes their mind and they want to join the Blocknet, the devs comes and say : Oops we change our mind again. We are joining the Blocknet.
Where is all that fuss about technology and improvement ? Even if Blocknet proves to be just BS. Who is stopping shadow to get out of it at anytime ?
I'm not going to argue anymore. This coin is not part of my plans anymore. Wish you all good luck.
6  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [SDC] Shadow | 1st OS Stealth Address | iOS+Android Staking | PoS-SPV | HTML5 on: October 18, 2014, 08:10:16 AM
Quote from: Coinster2014 on October 18, 2014, 07:59:29 AM
Quote from: Bolomir on October 18, 2014, 07:53:50 AM
Quote from: rynomster on October 18, 2014, 01:51:36 AM
Hi all

After a few lengthy discussions and votes amongst team members, we've decided that we will not be joining BlockNet.

Details will be provided shortly
I've been waiting for this coin to move for ages. I'm may not be a big holder of shadow with my 10k coins but with the news of Blocknet I really thought that things are going to improve.
It looks like the 2 biggest holders of shadow pookie and longshort really can decide where this coin to go.
You say "discussions and votes amongst team members" decided the future of this coin. Really! Why didn't you vote "amongst team members" before making the announcement of joining the Blocknet ?
This comes to show that your interest in Crypto technology and evolution is very little, and 2 or more big holders can decide on the future of it.
As Viper said these 2 were more "vocal". Of course they were, because there is big money involved in their loud talking.
You and them probably have the biggest money invested in the coin, so you are not looking at the future of the coin but for profit that can be manipulated by few members. That makes this coin despite its technology, a pump and dump for the future.
Should you have joined the blocknet there would have been some rules to respect and fair-play not just pump and dump.
Each coin had to keep pace with the technology.
It looks that pookie and longandshort are afraid of that and you too and rather stay solo in order to manipulate and decide the faith of the coin at anytime.
So i'm waiting for that pump, whenever you and the big holders decide, to dump mine.
Very disappointed  to find out that this coin is only for money making. Your change of decision based on the big holders just proved that.


The problem with SDC at its core is that the coin distribution is really skewed to the people that mined it at the beginning.   You can totally tell from the rich list.

http://sdc.blockexplorer.cc/richlist/index.php?min=0

Look at these stats:

Only 381 addresses with at least 10 SDC
Only 290 addresses with at least 100 SDC
Only 215 addresses with at least 500 SDC
Only 177 addresses with at least 1000 SDC
Only 101 addresses with at least 5000 SDC
Only 33 addresses with at least 50000 SDC
Only 18 addresses with at least 100000 SDC

The whole SDC basically is owned by under 350 people (some wallets for sure have more than 1 addresses).   (Not to mention that pookielax and mr.boh have a huge portion of SDC waiting to dump on our ass.)

That can only mean that this coin is not distributed evenly and in the long term, the coin will not survived if we don't expand the number of people that owns SDC.  

I really need to reconsider my position in SDC after this debacle....
"if we don't expand the number of people that owns SDC" And how is that supposed to happen ?
Joining the blocknet would have been a Statement that shadow means business and is not afraid of taking things seriously, and that would have attracted more and more buyers, let alone the fact that being part of the blocknet would have brought more income for the coin, making it stronger. The faith of the coin is in the hands of a few. I've never seen in my life such a change of decision, after the complaint of 2 holders. WE, all the others seem to have been happy of joining the Blocknet.
Clearly, our voices did not matter much!
7  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [SDC] Shadow | 1st OS Stealth Address | iOS+Android Staking | PoS-SPV | HTML5 on: October 18, 2014, 07:53:50 AM
Quote from: rynomster on October 18, 2014, 01:51:36 AM
Hi all

After a few lengthy discussions and votes amongst team members, we've decided that we will not be joining BlockNet.

Details will be provided shortly
I've been waiting for this coin to move for ages. I'm may not be a big holder of shadow with my 10k coins but with the news of Blocknet I really thought that things are going to improve.
It looks like the 2 biggest holders of shadow pookie and longshort really can decide where this coin to go.
You say "discussions and votes amongst team members" decided the future of this coin. Really! Why didn't you vote "amongst team members" before making the announcement of joining the Blocknet ?
This comes to show that your interest in Crypto technology and evolution is very little, and 2 or more big holders can decide on the future of it.
As Viper said these 2 were more "vocal". Of course they were, because there is big money involved in their loud talking.
You and them probably have the biggest money invested in the coin, so you are not looking at the future of the coin but for profit that can be manipulated by few holders. That makes this coin despite its technology, a pump and dump for the future.
Should you have joined the blocknet there would have been some rules to respect and fair-play not just pump and dump.
Each coin had to keep pace with the technology.
It looks that pookie and longandshort are afraid of that and you too and rather stay solo in order to manipulate and decide the faith of the coin at anytime.
So i'm waiting for that pump, whenever you and the big holders decide, to dump mine.
Very disappointed  to find out that this coin is only for money making. Your change of decision based on the big holders just proved that.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!