Bitcoin Forum
November 05, 2024, 08:00:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 88 »
1  Economy / Services / Re: Bitcoin 100 has run its course. This is the rebate thread. on: October 26, 2016, 12:57:16 AM
This was a nice surprise to see when I logged in.

Thanks for running this for so long.

1PVxnBfNZqmrpskVQvXEf8pzSvJSTnD37h
2  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: libbitcoin on: March 20, 2014, 05:44:47 AM
I forgot to post an update here.  Thanks to wozz at Github, libbitcoin, libwallet, obelisk, sx, and obelisk now all build on OSX with https://github.com/WyseNynja/homebrew-bitcoin
3  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: WyseNynja's Homebrew tap for all your OSX bitcoin needs on: March 20, 2014, 05:35:51 AM
I've updated bitcoind (and bitcoin-cli) to version 0.9.0!  It builds on Mavericks easily.

I'm still working on the --with-coinpunk flag.
4  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] on: February 11, 2014, 07:12:46 AM
I've updated https://github.com/WyseNynja/vanitygen with 2 bug fixes reported on GitHub.

If you already have vanitygen installed from my OSX homebrew tap:

Code:
brew update
brew prune
brew upgrade vanitygen

If you don't:

Code:
brew tap WyseNynja/bitcoin
brew prune
brew install vanitygen
5  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: libbitcoin on: January 26, 2014, 11:18:17 PM
I'm trying to get this working on OS X again now that new versions are out.

https://github.com/WyseNynja/homebrew-bitcoin/issues/19
https://github.com/WyseNynja/homebrew-bitcoin/issues/20
https://github.com/WyseNynja/homebrew-bitcoin/issues/21
6  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] on: December 16, 2013, 02:57:52 AM
kernel file calc_address.cl is erroring when opening, apparently, any solution?
"calc_address.cl"

On windows, using the oclvanitygen executable
I got that on OSX when it tried to build the .oclbin file (which it does on first run if the file does not exist) without being in the same directory as calc_address.cl.

I'm not sure how to resolve this on windows, but in OS X, that file is installed by my brew tap to /usr/local/opt/vanitygen/include/


nevrending I think the -D flag you are using is wrong.  Try this,

Code:
brew reinstall vanitygen
cd /usr/local/opt/vanitygen/include
oclvanitygen -d 1 -k 1111111
7  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] on: December 15, 2013, 08:10:22 PM
samr7 doesn't seem to have touched his repo in a while.  I went ahead and forked his repo and merged in pretty much all the public branches on github.  I've done some quick tests, and there were no merge conflicts, but it's possible I combined some incompatible things.  

https://github.com/samr7/vanitygen/network has lots of pretty colored lines connecting to one branch now.  I also updated my OSX brew tap (`brew tap WyseNynja/bitcoin && brew install WyseNynja/bitcoin/vanitygen`) to include my branch of vanitygen which I tagged version 0.23-red.  It worked for me on Mavericks and it uses brew's openssl.  I added the red suffix just in case someone else has already done this and I just missed it in my cursory searching.

Hi. I'm getting the following error
Code:
MacBookLive:vanitygen y458m$ oclvanitygen -D 0:1 -k 1111111
Difficulty: 281474976710656
Compiling kernel, can take minutes...vg_ocl_context_callback error: [CL_DEVICE_NOT_AVAILABLE] : OpenCL Error : Error: Build Program driver returned (517)
vg_ocl_context_callback error: OpenCL Warning : clBuildProgram failed: could not build program for 0x1021b00 (ATI Radeon HD 6750M) (err:-2)
vg_ocl_context_callback error: [CL_BUILD_ERROR] : OpenCL Build Error : Compiler build log:
Error returned by cvms_element_build_from_source

failure.
clBuildProgram: CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE
Build log:
Error returned by cvms_element_build_from_source
Device: ATI Radeon HD 6750M
Vendor: AMD (1021b00)
Driver: 1.2 (Sep 19 2013 22:22:06)
Profile: FULL_PROFILE
Version: OpenCL 1.2
Max compute units: 6
Max workgroup size: 256
Global memory: 536870912
Max allocation: 134217728
Could not open device '0:1', ignoring
Available OpenCL platforms:
0: [Apple] Apple
  0: [Intel] Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2675QM CPU @ 2.20GHz
  1: [AMD] ATI Radeon HD 6750M

How can I resolve this? Thanks Smiley
Hmm. I'm not really sure.  I don't have a mac with a graphics card and haven't been able to test the opencl pieces Sad  I made an issue on github, lets continue this conversation there.  https://github.com/WyseNynja/vanitygen/issues/2

samr7 doesn't seem to have touched his repo in a while.  I went ahead and forked his repo and merged in pretty much all the public branches on github.  I've done some quick tests, and there were no merge conflicts, but it's possible I combined some incompatible things. 

https://github.com/samr7/vanitygen/network has lots of pretty colored lines connecting to one branch now.  I also updated my OSX brew tap (`brew tap WyseNynja/bitcoin && brew install WyseNynja/bitcoin/vanitygen`) to include my branch of vanitygen which I tagged version 0.23-red.  It worked for me on Mavericks and it uses brew's openssl.  I added the red suffix just in case someone else has already done this and I just missed it in my cursory searching.

I see you pulled in (among other things) my compressed-key fixes.  Cool

I spend most of my time in Linux, but I had a request come through for a Windows build.  After tinkering with the makefile a bit, I got Visual C++ 2008 to build vanitygen.  The result is here:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/57535575/vanitygen-0.23-red-win32.zip

oclvanityminer is not included, as libcurl was built against a different OpenSSL DLL than what was used for building the other tools.  If you need oclvanityminer, set up a Linux box...building from source on Linux is much easier than building from source on Windows.  vanitygen, oclvanitygen, and keyconv have been built. 

Thanks for the fixes Smiley  If you submit a patch for the Makefile, I'll probably merge it in, too.

samr7 doesn't seem to have touched his repo in a while.  I went ahead and forked his repo and merged in pretty much all the public branches on github.  I've done some quick tests, and there were no merge conflicts, but it's possible I combined some incompatible things. 

https://github.com/samr7/vanitygen/network has lots of pretty colored lines connecting to one branch now.  I also updated my OSX brew tap (`brew tap WyseNynja/bitcoin && brew install WyseNynja/bitcoin/vanitygen`) to include my branch of vanitygen which I tagged version 0.23-red.  It worked for me on Mavericks and it uses brew's openssl.  I added the red suffix just in case someone else has already done this and I just missed it in my cursory searching.

Do you have a precompiled OSX build of Vanitygen?
I can upload the one that I've built on my laptop.  No guarantees it's portable though.
8  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] on: November 25, 2013, 06:46:24 PM
Greetings.
According to oclvanitygen.c :
'"By default, <pattern> is interpreted as an exact prefix.\n"'
But is there any possibility to use the vanitygen on an OpenCL device to find address not only by prefix, but, for example, by suffix or postfix or regex.

For example not like "1Love.*" but like "1.*Love"?
I think it would be possible, but I know regex would be a lot slower.
9  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [50 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: November 25, 2013, 06:45:04 PM
Hi forrestv and all contributors of p2pool,

Many thanks to this fantastic mining pool. It's really fun to tuning p2pool to maximize miner's income for geeky users like me.

But I wonder if you have any plan to enable IPv6 support of p2pool?
Since official bitcoin client has IPv6 enabled by default, I think enabling IPv6 support will make p2pool network even more pervasive and well connected.
More importantly, IPv6 will help those users with both v4 & v6 network, but behind firewall or NAT in v4 network, just like me.
I do have a very good connectivity to v6 network and can accept income connections.
But v4 network is NATed with high latency, and I think that might be the source of my high orphan rate.

I have checked that twisted library used in p2pool support IPv6 network, at least partially.
I'm not familiar with python, so I don't know for sure.
I wonder if it is possible to enable IPv6 network in p2pool?

Thanks again to this great mining pool. :-)
I'm all for IPv6, but will adding IPv6 support be enough for you?  I think you will still likely need to talk to IPv4 peers for a while since I doubt everyone in the pool can make the switch.
10  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] on: November 25, 2013, 08:25:24 AM
samr7 doesn't seem to have touched his repo in a while.  I went ahead and forked his repo and merged in pretty much all the public branches on github.  I've done some quick tests, and there were no merge conflicts, but it's possible I combined some incompatible things.  

https://github.com/samr7/vanitygen/network has lots of pretty colored lines connecting to one branch now.  I also updated my OSX brew tap (`brew tap WyseNynja/bitcoin && brew install WyseNynja/bitcoin/vanitygen`) to include my branch of vanitygen which I tagged version 0.23-red.  It worked for me on Mavericks and it uses brew's openssl.  I added the red suffix just in case someone else has already done this and I just missed it in my cursory searching.
11  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: [PREORDER] Trezor: Bitcoin hardware wallet on: November 24, 2013, 08:52:14 PM
And for usability, I think it should say "Fast use for Internet transactions."  I can hand you a paper wallet pretty quickly if we are next to each other Smiley

I don't know.  Getting a paper wallet from someone doesn't seem transacted until the coins are removed from it.  Who knows who else may have seen it or have a copy of it.  Until exclusive control of the coins it contains is established, is it a completed transaction?

That's reasonable.  Although it takes virtually no time to sweep a wallet, and then the transaction is completed.  The funds aren't in a paper wallet anymore, but the transaction is complete and it can be fast.  I still think this should say "Fast use for Internet transactions."

Also, what stops a USB Flash drive from being BIP 32?  Seems like it should be "possible"
12  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: [PREORDER] Trezor: Bitcoin hardware wallet on: November 24, 2013, 06:31:31 AM
I'm not quite sure your comparison chart is fair to paper wallets.

With split keys (Armory) or encrypted keys (BIP38) they should be at least a "possible" in a couple more categories.

I'd also say "Phishing protection" is "n/a" for paper wallets since you have "no" for transaction signing.

And why is BIP32 not listed under paper backup?  You have the Trezor listed as "yes" for BIP32 and "yes" for disaster recovery saying it uses a paper wallet, so it seems like BIP32 should be "possible" for paper wallet.

And for usability, I think it should say "Fast use for Internet transactions."  I can hand you a paper wallet pretty quickly if we are next to each other Smiley

That said, I'm super excited for my Trezor!
13  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [50 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: November 24, 2013, 06:16:47 AM
I stopped mining awhile ago, but I've left my p2pool node up.  It's averaged 36 peers in the last year and it's bitcoind node is well connected.  It has a high speed internet connection and has had excellent uptime.

Is a node like mine actually helpful for p2pool?  I'm assuming that having a well connected node is good for spreading transactions and protecting p2pool from some kind of network attack.  Am I right, or is a non-mining node not helpful? It's just a git pull and a restart ever now and then, so it's not much effort.

If a non-mining node is helpful, is there anything else I can do to make it more useful?  Maybe set the max connections to something a lot higher so the pool sees more transactions?  I'm just guessing.
14  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: RAM-Reduction & Backup Center Testing (version 0.89.99.16) on: November 24, 2013, 05:37:49 AM
OS X app crashes for me on Mavericks after a few minutes of use, too Sad
15  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: WyseNynja's Homebrew tap for all your OSX bitcoin needs on: November 18, 2013, 03:52:11 AM
I've updated the tap to install bitcoind 0.8.5.  It only works on mavericks if you install with `brew install wysenynja/bitcoin/bitcoind --HEAD`

I expect 0.8.6 to work with Mavericks without issue.
16  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: libbitcoin on: November 10, 2013, 06:00:40 AM
I've managed to get libbitcoin built on osx!  I'm still having trouble with obelisk and sx, but libbitcoin and pybitcointools seem to be working!

https://github.com/WyseNynja/homebrew-bitcoin
17  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: RAM-Reduction & Backup Center Testing (version 0.89.99.8) on: November 03, 2013, 09:42:11 PM
I can't manage to get bitcoind built on OSX 10.9 Sad  My tap (https://github.com/WyseNynja/homebrew-bitcoin) doesn't seem to be working anymore.

I've downloaded the official bitcoin-qt binary and am getting the blockchain with it now.
18  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: RAM-Reduction & Backup Center Testing (version 0.89.99.8) on: November 03, 2013, 08:45:57 PM
I'm testing out the .app now.  Awesome work!  I haven't had any time to play with Armory recently.  Hopefully bitcoind works for me without crashing and corrupting the block chain like it was last time I tried bitcoin on OSX.
19  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory Bitcoin Wallet Raises $600k led by Trace Mayer on: September 16, 2013, 09:43:48 PM
By the way, Coindesk just ran the story, after interviewing me.

http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-wallet-armory-raises-600k-seed-funding/


Congrats. Love to see Armory live up to its full potential.
Grats!  I'm excited to see the project move forward like this.
20  Economy / Services / Re: Bitcoin 100: Developed Specifically for Non-Profits on: August 07, 2013, 12:25:51 AM
Got word back from the university. Unfortunately, if a club wants to take donations it has to go through a web page on the university site. We can't have deposits going directly into the chapter's bank account.

Side note:

Quote
Legally, SSDP consists of two separate, distinct entities – Students for Sensible Drug Policy Foundation and Students for Sensible Drug Policy Inc. The former, as a 501(c)3 organization, engages in education and outreach. Donations to SSDP Foundation are tax-deductible. SSDP Inc, as a 501(c)4 organization, engages in advocacy, or attempts to effect change to law and policy. Accordingly, donations to SSDP Inc are not tax-deductible...
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 88 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!