Barrabas is my buy signal (not the coins he promotes though).

No we don't. But we have a nice project, that could be handled in a much more effective way but that it is developing well enough to possibly be a huge success in the end. Don't pay attention to outspoken people that feel disappointed in the new improvements. This is not a quick easy mining scheme. Cannot be. Souldn't be. But let the price guide you and you'll see that a growing amount of people want in. And want in big time, not mining 7 coins a day. That's just the initial distribution model: You are in, if you want, for free. No one else has done that other that copy/paste jobs without any reason to exist underneath. The possibilities on this one are so amazing it is actually both mind boggling and for our young team impossible to even visualize. Let the dissatisfied go, many more will be joining in.

And no, it isn't a good idea to lower the difficulty: Think you will be running out of coins all the faster. Then what?

I don't see any dispute... no one with eyes and very basic common sense would see one in that exchange. I see an undisputed authority in crypto, the most relevant and (arguably) knowledgeable individual in crypto, dismissing AND despising an "annoying troll" in the form of a self-declared "crypto entrepreneur" with a history of absolute failure in his ONLY enterprise in crypto.

With that in mind, and considering the FACT that no one uses VIA for anything and very few people has even heard of VIA at all, even inside of crypto, after all this time, any "armchair commentator" can make a very educated commentary about the dispute AND the dubious merits of a coin that serves no purpose whatsoever.

... and once on IRC while we were discussing about marketing and hype that happened based on development amongh other things john-connor said: "I don't build companies that lose"
VNL is 100% development with 0% hype, with unique properties VNL is game changer ... it's next generation crypto currency.
So, whoever waiting ZeroTime to cash out on price rise will make mistake IMHO cause ZeroTime will only prove VNL superiority in development over anything in crypto ecosystem.

You should write for Seinfeld maybe, you are that funny.

Dying to read about other of your suggestions, really...

The path of success is just ahead for DGC. halinyo and "Jettin'" Just Jared on board... how can it fail???

For further insurance, may I suggest you enroll Bobsurplus?

Both of you are absolutely correct that the model recruitment, apart from the site traffic, is the most difficult aspect of a new adult site, but please note we are software developers and we are not addressing directly the model recruitment issue. We have created a platform and the studios who use the platform will recruit the models as well as we hope independent models will find the platform useful. For instance, we have a live private group show feature: top models can advertise for their twitter followers the time and date of the live private group show on the jizzmo.net site, and then perform the show for a 95% cash out share. Will that feature be popular? We don't know, but common sense dictates it could be, this feature is not supported by other service providers, and after all the 40% more revenue could be an incentive for models to use our platform. We are already receiving inquiries at jizzmo.net regarding to this feature.

Someone read our whitepaper a few months ago and asked, can internet connected adult web-cams use our IoT platform and device micropayments to lower their cost and pay out 90-95% percent for the models/sudios? We thought it is a good idea and created the web application for this use case.  

All due respect, I don't understand what barabbas' concern is regarding to the token. All sites are built on the token concept. Livejasmin has token, MyFreecams has token. The token is only medium of exchange for application specific transactions for all service providers and our token happened to be in the blockchain. Why is that an issue? The models get FIAT from jizzmo.net as well so I don't understand why the token is a problem. I also don't understand why barabbas think the filtering can be managed by others, but it is an impossible task for us. Filtering is the combination of administrative procedures such as ID verification, model and studio due diligence, and real time monitoring. I am not sure why barabbas think our platform and community unable to manage those tasks?

Regarding to our business plan, please note the adult content is only one use case. Our platform is capable to manage other uses cases as well. We are rolling out other services such as the streemo.net generic live video streaming platform. Please note the long term plan is to focus on ledgers for devices and IoT micropayments. This is only the start, our start is connected to the popular adult theme, but we have to start somewhere.

This picture explains what are the other use cases for live P2P video streaming.

A quick price check ... wow, a massive 4 BTC volume on the market and the price is 6K.

Keep up the good work VRC developers, as you said VRC will replace Bitcoin, it seems it's happening!

Yep, triple duty. Go pant-man, go...

I am kind of familiar with logic from both mathematics and philosophy viewpoint, but I am not sure what you mean, could you explain please what part of logic related with the pure fact that a fucking 54 quantity from something (in this case percentage) is more than a fucking 46? :-))) In this context I am struggling to relate anything to this pair of numbers other than a simple arithmetical comparison: 54 > 46.

EDIT:
I mean, 54 isn't more than 46?

While I agree on most of points with Barabbas and disagree with him on a few (for example I believe the Mintpal bailout was not necessary as with a 500 lines of code, max 16 hours development time the big hand attack could be handled by building a counter attacking logic into the application), I can assure you altcoinUK is not Barabbas' puppet account and I think it is quite unfair to attack Barabbas again. Therefore, let me point out that if anyone was factually incorrect in the starting post then it was me. Moreover, I was not disputing whether the Mintpal fact was necessary or not, I was stating the facts what happened ... if you could read then perhaps you could verify that indeed this is the case.

Anyway, please feel free to post in this unmoderated thread what else is factually incorrect in the start post and lets discuss the facts about VeriCoin.  

While I agree on most of points with Barabbas and disagree with him on a few (for example I believe the Mintpal bailout was not necessary as with a 500 lines of code, max 16 hours development time the big hand attack could be handled by building a counter attacking logic into the application), I can assure you altcoinUK is not Barabbas' puppet account and I think it is quite unfair to attack Barabbas again. Therefore, let me point out that if anyone was factually incorrect in the starting post then it was me. Moreover, I was not disputing whether the Mintpal fact was necessary or not, I was stating the facts what happened ... if you could read then perhaps you could verify that indeed this is the case.

Anyway, please feel free to post in this unmoderated thread what else is factually incorrect in the start post and lets discuss the facts about VeriCoin.