Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
halo gan kalau mau mendapatkan vcc di mana sih??? misalnya untuk daftar netflix atau aws??? terimakasih
|
|
|
#Proof of authentication telegram: @merylernik
|
|
|
#Proof of authentication telegram: @merylernik
|
|
|
#Proof of authentication telegram: @merylernik
|
|
|
#Proof of authentication post links telegram: @merylernik
|
|
|
#Proof of authentication post links telegram: @merylernik
|
|
|
#Proof of authentication post links telegram: @merylernik
|
|
|
why we need to join telegram for twitter bounty?
|
|
|
Just got my first S7 in, anything special I should configure for CKPool? Any other tips for an S7?
Use hosting. j/k... Just be sure and give it a proper PSU with all the power connections. AFAIK, the usual pool settings should work. Got mine at 575 MH and 30% fan speed to try to cut down on the noise... Other than that, you should be GTG.  oh wow, yeah, this thing is loud, what temperature does yours reach running 575MH w/30% fan speed? I just set mine to 575MH with 50% fan speed, and got a lot of x's, something I need to change other than the two drop downs in the GUI? Actually, the x's went away, some remnant of restarting I guess
|
|
|
Just got my first S7 in, anything special I should configure for CKPool? Any other tips for an S7?
Use hosting. j/k... Just be sure and give it a proper PSU with all the power connections. AFAIK, the usual pool settings should work. Got mine at 575 MH and 30% fan speed to try to cut down on the noise... Other than that, you should be GTG.  oh wow, yeah, this thing is loud, what temperature does yours reach running 575MH w/30% fan speed? I just set mine to 575MH with 50% fan speed, and got a lot of x's, something I need to change other than the two drop downs in the GUI?
|
|
|
Just got my first S7 in, anything special I should configure for CKPool? Any other tips for an S7?
|
|
|
Payout 346373 sent 181bbf944d87d249d824071dbd95f13d8adac712764ed14b97f0dd9e6ae66b97
OK ... I'll go through block chain and his payouts vs his account. Will post reply here soon.
I wonder if he mines somewhere that takes a fee?
OK, you will actually notice that most all payouts are MORE than what shows on your web page. The reason is that you mine to both an account that uses the address 13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE and direct to the address 13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE The payout in your wallet combines the two - since it would be silly for me to send a transaction with 2 separate amounts to the same address - my script combines them to a single line in the payout. ... ..... Each of the rest will match your wallet if you add them together per block and the ones labelled "chinesebob" will match the web page https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/address/13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE/transactionsLook for the transactions from the pool. Ah, ok, makes sense now, for the first day I was mining to my address instead of user, thanks for looking at it
|
|
|
Mine do not match
Block Address Status BTC 346415 13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE 0.01027603 346411 13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE 0.01025143 346373 13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE 0.00882940 346279 13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE 0.00565353 346251 13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE 0.00402624 346176 13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE 0.00022625
$ bitcoin-cli listtransactions "" 4|grep -E 'address|amount|timer' "address" : "13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE", "amount" : 0.00218105, "timereceived" : 1425510652 "address" : "13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE", "amount" : 0.00507784, "timereceived" : 1425563799 "address" : "13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE", "amount" : 0.00889775, "timereceived" : 1425608031 "address" : "13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE", "amount" : 0.01058881, "timereceived" : 1425625816
Check Blockchain "address" : "13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE", "amount" : 0.01058881, "timereceived" : 1425625816 Payed: https://blockchain.info/address/1KzFJddTvK9TQWsmWFKYJ9fRx9QeSATyrTThe other 3 haven't been paid out yet, Kano pays manually, they show in the web interface but will not be paid until 101 confirms. I am guessing the fop info is from the web interface? did you mine with just an address and then switch to a registered account? Blockchain has the exact same info as listtransactions, it's all the same Blockchain right? In any case I double checked, same values in Blockchain.info as on my local chain. It doesn't matter when whatever transaction was pushed through, none of them match, not one, zilch.
|
|
|
Mine do not match
Block Address Status BTC 346415 13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE 0.01027603 346411 13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE 0.01025143 346373 13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE 0.00882940 346279 13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE 0.00565353 346251 13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE 0.00402624 346176 13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE 0.00022625
$ bitcoin-cli listtransactions "" 4|grep -E 'address|amount|timer' "address" : "13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE", "amount" : 0.00218105, "timereceived" : 1425510652 "address" : "13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE", "amount" : 0.00507784, "timereceived" : 1425563799 "address" : "13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE", "amount" : 0.00889775, "timereceived" : 1425608031 "address" : "13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnE", "amount" : 0.01058881, "timereceived" : 1425625816
|
|
|
I can't see your "bitcoin-cli listtransactions" However as the Payments page says on it "The payments below don't yet show when they have been sent." The payments show up on the "Payments" page before they are sent. I say in here when I have sent them. They are sent after the block reaches +101 It's the same as listed at https://blockchain.info/address/13HPyx1B67C9KTrbHTEeJBYCVE2bhTnBnEsince starting in this pool (with an account) I have received transactions 0.00218105 2015-03-04 23:20:52 0.00507784 2015-03-05 16:16:25 0.00889775 2015-03-06 02:14:25 0.01058881 2015-03-06 07:14:48 but, the payments listed in CKPool Payments don't match any of them, nor do any combination of them add up to the same number that I can find, so, what's the diff about? CKpool Payments 0.00022625 0.00402624 0.00565353 0.00882940 0.01025143 0.01027603
|
|
|
Is cgminer authenticating securely when it does ./cgminer -o stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333 -u Kano.worker -p x ? I'm wondering if someone could sniff the password on the wire, then login to the web interface and change the payout address? I don't have enough hashing power for it to matter much if someone were to do that to me, just curious, and I try to use ssl if available whenever I'm sending passwords.
Never use the same password for your worker on cgminer as the website password. ckpool doesn't even use the worker password so dont even bother sending one. ah, thanks, for some reason I thought it was using the same login
|
|
|
Is cgminer authenticating securely when it does ./cgminer -o stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333 -u Kano.worker -p x ? I'm wondering if someone could sniff the password on the wire, then login to the web interface and change the payout address? I don't have enough hashing power for it to matter much if someone were to do that to me, just curious, and I try to use ssl if available whenever I'm sending passwords.
|
|
|
If anyone still running the new firmware, would you please post here the line used to start cgminer? It "should" be in the System Log (under Status) immediately after starting up (I think that is where I saw it before, but may be wrong!) or even better, if you SSH into the rig open the file /etc/init.d/cgminer with vi editor and scroll down to the line that starts PARAMS= (not #PARAMS=). I think the issue of dropping hash-rate may be due to the setting of auto-voltage / frequency (and the startup line may reveal that!).
You can extract the filesystem from the new firmware like this dd if=antMiner_S320141126.bin of=kernel bs=1 ibs=1 count=1015116 dd if=antMiner_S320141126.bin of=filesystem.squashfs bs=1 ibs=1 count=2448854 skip=1015116 unsquashfs filesystem.squashfs ls -1 squashfs-root
|
|
|
What does this mean?
> in download_shares: > Traceback (most recent call last): > Failure: p2pool.p2p.ShareReplyError: too long
|
|
|
|