Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 03:15:36 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
1  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: anyone tried running with VIA Padlock extensions? on: November 27, 2010, 02:53:11 PM
I had not even gotten far enough to determine why your code lacked the midstate caching stuff Smiley  If you have the hardware (I don't), giving my miner a try would be really helpful.  I don't even have a simple "it works" confirmation on VIA yet.

If you happen to figure out anything interesting, I'll be happy to integrate it and post a new Windows build.

No problem. I'll see if I can find some time to boot a linux live cd and play with it. Otherwise it's running a Windows build right now.
2  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: anyone tried running with VIA Padlock extensions? on: November 27, 2010, 07:12:21 AM
Thanks for the inspiration.  After reading this, I added VIA padlock support to my CPU miner.

Cool! Did you ever figure out how to get midstate caching working with it? I thought th C7 were capable of it. I know the Nanos are, but I thought VIA had it somewhere on their site. I'll have to try a Windows build of it.
3  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: block generation on the VIA C7 on: October 22, 2010, 01:31:47 AM
I can find the link and post it up again.

Edit: The link works again. Something changed on my host but is just fine now.
4  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: OpenCore has a open-soruce SHA core... on: September 23, 2010, 09:06:38 PM
Problem for me is, I've got the hardware and software(got it to try this) but haven't been good enough with VHDL to figure out how to interface it between that and Bitcoin.
5  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Freenode / #Bitcoin-Dev Chat Logs on: September 22, 2010, 04:14:34 AM
I'm all for it. As previously posted, I simply don't want it to be indexed by any search engines.
6  Other / Off-topic / Re: UK Proposes All Paychecks Go to the State First on: September 21, 2010, 05:38:55 PM
I suspect nearly every country still has cash because if you get rid of it a non-state alternative will pop up so fast. They'd rather have us hoarding their tokens.

Oh, you mean something like a digital commodity that could be printed out and transferred just as easily in person as online?  Wink
7  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: This is really cool! on: September 21, 2010, 04:15:54 PM
This is really cool! Nice video btw ;-)
Take the BTC as a tip.
8  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Dash7/Near Field Communications and mobile Bitcoin clients on: September 21, 2010, 01:03:55 AM
As there has been a piece of this project missing since I ever came into it, I believe we have just found the problem for the solution that is Bitcoin.

Not an IF, but WHEN this technology is finally incorporated into smartphones, and whatever the next gen replacement device ends up being, it will start another revolution of the people through their tracking and buying power. Yes, it can be used against them just as all tracking is, but even more than that it can be used so completely decentralized that nothing could stop it beyond the entire ban of the spectrum it will use. Even if that ends up happening, there will certainly be enough Electrical Engineers and hardware Hackers out there who will move beyond the limitations set by the governments(s) in the ongoing pursuit of The Hacker Ethic.

It will be amazing to see what results when this technology comes to fruition. Think of the changes when people were given the ability to think for themselves and publish(think Bill of Rights for United States of America) and now apply that to economic policy. Freedom to create, save and spend as wanted without limitations set forth by processing entities. If the economic model that Bitcoin uses fails to succeed as we all hope and plan, then it is merely a chance to try something else. Still without a fake 'controlling entity' who merely upends the market and helps greed grow. This would enable not just a test of Bitcoin, but a test of the coming generations in freedom and liberty never seen before.

Edit: Fix some spelling errors to give clearer language and understanding. Add extra ideas. See original quoted post below:
9  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: A slightly more open approach to bitcoin on the GPU on: September 13, 2010, 08:50:06 PM
Still, I could just not start the cuda miner and allow the client to still use the CPU Smiley

IMHO, this would be a far better method of it than simply failing. Although, there should be some type of warning that it is failing over to CPU from GPU.
10  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: A slightly more open approach to bitcoin on the GPU on: September 13, 2010, 07:05:59 PM
From what I've read, you can use the -emu to emulate GPU code on your CPU. No idea if that's it or it actually works but it's definitely worth a shot.

Oh, I completely understand wanting to understand your tools. I just felt because I am so used to working with the IDE and strapping it all together it would be easier for me to write on there to work on my linux and windows boxes.
I don't even check if the gpu is cuda capable, for crying out load Smiley

BAHAHAHAHA!!! NICE! Might wanna get that checked out instead of silently failing or imploding ;-)
11  Economy / Marketplace / Re: 100 BTC giveaway. Post address for bitcoins! on: September 13, 2010, 05:34:06 PM
Heh, I'm in.

154MWZRUMiUHkX1hDejbzuSGg53hpW7poe
That's my input to the lottery, send 'em there! I'll send over 16 of mine too!
12  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: A slightly more open approach to bitcoin on the GPU on: September 13, 2010, 03:18:46 PM
I've tried to compile it under Ubuntu 64bit, but have run into issues with it. I would greatly appreciate it if you could give me some info about compiling for CUDA or a link to such information.

Are you planning on using an IDE? If so, what is it? I prefer Netbeans and have it set up and running on Fedora 13 64bit. It's a bit of a pain to get setup, but works quite well once you do have it done.

After a quick search this pops up and looks very promising for you:
http://lifeofaprogrammergeek.blogspot.com/2008/05/cuda-development-in-ubuntu.html


I ran out of time this weekend to get any work done and fried my PSU last week due to overusage. New 850W will get to me tomorrow night.  Cheesy
13  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: A slightly more open approach to bitcoin on the GPU on: September 09, 2010, 01:36:13 PM
As of now, yes. It depends on how efficient we can implement the miner in the GPUs. If the entire control structure of the miner with the rest of the system in the cpu(ideally), then no you wouldn't. As of now, it will definitely impact how fast it is. This will take a bit to come to fruition, but when it does... dedicated systems would be quite easy to build.
14  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: A slightly more open approach to bitcoin on the GPU on: September 09, 2010, 04:28:09 AM
I am also working on a version of the BitCoin CUDA Client and will do all that I can to help this project. It will be opensourced as well, for the same reasons nelisky stated. I will test this first version out on my GTX 460(borrowing from a friend  Grin) as soon as I can. Also, the pseudocode I've been writing up should be quite a bit faster than this currently is because it is incorporating FPGA styling and CUDA programming.

I should have something up of my code up after the weekend.
15  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: tcatm's 4-way SSE2 for Linux 32/64-bit is in 0.3.10 on: August 24, 2010, 05:31:08 PM
Anybody catch the new AMD Bulldozer press release? If I understand correctly, it should be capable of processing 8 64bit hashes, per core, at the same time. Would be quite a speed boost using this same code design.

Slashdot has the article.
PC Perspective has the details.

Was also covered by AnandTech back in November, 2009.
16  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Bitcoind x86 binary for CentOS on: August 24, 2010, 01:27:32 PM
I've got the bitcoind binary, but not a GUI build.
17  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: anyone tried running with VIA Padlock extensions? on: August 21, 2010, 03:05:03 PM
Download 0.3.10 HERE!!

---

Trying to figure out OpenSSL support for VIA padlock functions seems like a quagmire from what I see so far surfing the net.

Yea, completely agree there. I've looked into it as well, lots might need to be changed.
18  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: 28 days without generation, i have 4200khash/s on: August 18, 2010, 11:15:59 PM
The worst thing about bitcoin (at least for me) is the fact you CANT test if all is fine, if youre generating coins without problems.

This is actively being worked on. Not sure on timeline, but it is in the works to be sent out either with the program or as a standalone program.
19  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Gblic issues on Asus 701 on: August 18, 2010, 12:40:36 AM
Please excuse my dumb question, but what OS is running on this? There are many people who could compile a static binary if we have that information.
20  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: tcatm's 4-way SSE2 for Linux 32/64-bit 0.3.9 rc2 on: August 15, 2010, 06:46:25 PM
Okay, makes sense. I have an i7 930 I'll try and test out with too.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!