 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
I just sent eth to deposit address but cannot buy tokens. Balance still shows 0 -- after 22 min and 72 confirmations.
I just learnt it needs 100 confirmations. |
|
|
|
|
I just sent eth to deposit address but cannot buy tokens. Balance still shows 0 -- after 22 min and 72 confirmations.
|
|
|
|
Why must I give you my phone number to buy tokens?  It is a nonsense... Please, change this because my phone number is not necessary to buy tokens... No... it's not necessary... It's a pitty... it seems a good project but I think you don't need that kind of information in order to invest in your project... what a pitty...  You can use a disposable phone number. |
|
|
|
E4ROW HITS MIN CAP! Thanks to all who supported our mission to spread Ether to the Rest Of the World through our games and apps. The very first thing we’d like to say is THANK YOU to the incredible bunch of investors we have met in the past three weeks. As we’ve stated in prior posts, our team tried to make the E4ROW crowdsale different from other ICOs of late. We sadly thought this experiment failed, but even if we missed the min cap we were happy still because it did something quite wonderful: Our low-hype, low-PR, meat-and-potatoes strategy attracted a truly exceptional group of investors who believe in our mission, product and team. Together we have proven that good guys sometimes win. We take your confidence in us as a duty to perform our very best going forward. We want to make you very proud of your decision to invest in E4ROW. We will put together some formal announcements and be back in touch very soon. http://www.stats.e4row.comhttps://etherscan.io/address/0x7b79387dd30dc6848dd2308c825b6802e99abc84Thanks to the last minute whale investing more than 1,600 eth! |
|
|
|
E4ROW HITS MIN CAP! Thanks to all who supported our mission to spread Ether to the Rest Of the World through our games and apps. The very first thing we’d like to say is THANK YOU to the incredible bunch of investors we have met in the past three weeks. As we’ve stated in prior posts, our team tried to make the E4ROW crowdsale different from other ICOs of late. We sadly thought this experiment failed, but even if we missed the min cap we were happy still because it did something quite wonderful: Our low-hype, low-PR, meat-and-potatoes strategy attracted a truly exceptional group of investors who believe in our mission, product and team. Together we have proven that good guys sometimes win. We take your confidence in us as a duty to perform our very best going forward. We want to make you very proud of your decision to invest in E4ROW. We will put together some formal announcements and be back in touch very soon. http://www.stats.e4row.comhttps://etherscan.io/address/0x7b79387dd30dc6848dd2308c825b6802e99abc84it says 4.500 eth and the min cap was 5k? wtf? You can see there are two internal transactions withdrawing 50 and 451 eth. https://etherscan.io/address/0x7b79387dd30dc6848dd2308c825b6802e99abc84#internaltx |
|
|
|
What a pitty -- seems not to work.  And high eth price is not helping. I love the design of this ico, without all that promotion stuff but huge potential. When is deadline? they can refund us all, learn from it and start again with proper pr and stuff im sure it will be a big success! That's also true! |
|
|
|
What a pitty -- seems not to work. And high eth price is not helping. I love the design of this ico, without all that promotion stuff but huge potential. When is deadline? Countdown is here https://www.e4row.co.il/contribute16 hours left Thanks. Hope dies last. |
|
|
|
What a pitty -- seems not to work. And high eth price is not helping. I love the design of this ico, without all that promotion stuff but huge potential. When is deadline? |
|
|
|
Quality of the products to be expected might be of importance for contributors. Devs, could you please explain why the only product you claim to have running so far is not online? -- www.unclefinneyspoker.com -- look one page back. this was already discussed. game is a smartphone app and there is no web version yet. this site was just text. you can donwload the app here: http://slideme.org/application/uncle-finney-s-pokerThat's very helpful, thanks a lot. I will join. |
|
|
|
Quality of the products to be expected might be of importance for contributors. Devs, could you please explain why the only product you claim to have running so far is not online? -- www.unclefinneyspoker.com -- |
|
|
|
Legal Question: If I rent my bandwidth to a mysterium network user who performs illegal activities through my internet connection, could I be charged?
We are working on several ways to protect Nodes from illegal activities from clients. Eg., whitelisting for certain activities to be allowed to run via node. That's interesting. Though it goes far beyond my comprehension how to whitelist internet activities (and exclude all others) without being a censor myself. ... Writing an email can be illegal if it's violating. But online email providers should be whitelisted. Hmm. |
|
|
|
|
Legal Question: If I rent my bandwidth to a mysterium network user who performs illegal activities through my internet connection, could I be charged?
|
|
|
|
nodes=boss
pools=secretary.. collating data of bosses and workers expenses
devs=workers.. being janitors maintaining the current company and making new product proposals...
secretary needs bosses approval otherwise secretaries work just ends up in the orphan bin, wasting secretaries time if it doesnt meet bosses standards.
devs need the bosses consent to use the new proposals and expand the company. or reject it and keep the company going in the same direction.
right now dynamic workers made a proposal to the bosses and just leaving it to the bosses to consent or not. no threats no deadlines
right now core workers made a proposal to the bosses andmad threats to support their proposal or they will initiate a strike if the bosses dside to go with dynamics proposal
I agree partially. But in Bitcoin there is a big difference in comparison to a company: The boss (=nodes) is divided into numerous singularities (yes, we love decentralization!) who cannot make fast coordinated decisions -- and who, I assume, have too little insight to do so. So there is a vacuum of power, which is logically filled by the most skilled "workers". |
|
|
|
I am not an expert on this things but in my opinion when we talk about codes there are several things to consider. The reason why core developer does not accept Bitcoin Unlimited its because it runs on hard fork and it is going away from the original form of bitcoin. Bitcoin Unlimited does not want to accept Segwit since they dont see the code fit to run and replace the current code.
I guess it is not about code or technics. It is about power and money. The obvious difficulties bitcoin has with too many transactions are a welcome argument for brutal measures -- with subsequent accumulation of power. You know, "populism"... |
|
|
|
If we really want bitcoin a means of payment for masses (like Roger states), we would need thousands of transaction per second. So increasing block size is NEVER a real solution.
well it might be, you just don't know how tech is going to be....and what will be cored in, plus what usually happens is BU if it won out would have to adopt a segwit soln down the track anyway That means BU would start with slightly increased block size (let's say doubled) to ease the urgent problems and then do almost the same as the core devs, but with the power in BU's hands? |
|
|
|
|
If we really want bitcoin a means of payment for masses (like Roger states), we would need thousands of transaction per second. So increasing block size is NEVER a real solution.
|
|
|
|
With a second layer, all the things I love about bitcoin vanish.
If you control the flow of money, you have power.
Remember when Visa, MC, and PayPal stopped processing donations to Snowden's living expense and legal defense fund?
There was nothing illegal about donating, but they didn't want you to so they didn't let you.
Right now, British banks look to see who is buying a lot of contraceptives and giving that information to police in case a lot of contraceptives are being bought for sex work.
Shouldn't the purchase of contraceptives, whether it is a small amount or large amount, be private?
With a second layer that we have to use for transactions, you can bet your ass both of those kinds of things will happen with Bitcoin too.
A second layer puts a private company in control over the flow of your money and that power will be abused, it always is abused.
Bitcoin will survive but Satoshi's vision will be dead.
As far as I did understand, Lightning is not a "second layer". Both partners of one transaction will have their transactions signed by the other; only if there is a dispute, transaction data will be given to the blockchain. So, usually, there is noone to control people's transactions, for it is the purpose of Lightning to get data off the chain in order to disburden it. Please correct me if I am wrong. |
|
|
|
|
I guess miners who signal their support for BU do so, because larger blocks would be the better of two evils for them. SegWit would be good for Bitcoin and its users, but immediately lower the fees and thus be bad for the miners.
With bigger block size, miners will gain time, until network will be overloaded again (which is sure to happen and initially again good for the miners) and claims for a "real" solution will rise again...
|
|
|
|
|
