 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
Ethereum has always been an accident going somewhere to happen right from the start. It has too many shady stories for it to last very long unlike litecoin which still stands against all odds.
Litecoin stands, but lets be honest, it is as good as dead now. Ethereum stories of shady dealings is just rhetoric from the Bitcoin fanatics. Ethereum has achieved more than any other blockchain in the past year. Ups and downs will need to happen to everyone before it hits mainstream, the same has happened to Bitcoin as well. |
|
|
|
|
There is literally no reason for the price to increase unless the demand for illegal stuff increases. That is what Bitcoin is these days.
EDIT: And pure speculation.
|
|
|
|
|
If you buy now, prepare to lose some money.
It will be going down in value for a while.
You have been warned.
|
|
|
|
|
Back to the 250-300 range.
|
|
|
|
bitcoin to 800, sure, i think it can happen.
After 2-3 years sure it will. No need of 2 or 3 years. With first quarter of 2016 itself we are going to see, $800 to $1000 price levels. If the global share market get crashed down, we can see those price levels within this January itself. But I prefer to go slow and steady for long term basis. Naaaaaaah. If the market crashes and things continue to escalate in the middle east, the profits will be flowing from oil and gold. Bitcoin may or may not be the future, but we are in the present day. Gold and oil still rule supreme. |
|
|
|
Why does this thread feel like I am watching Ancient Aliens? Seriously, I appreciate people who have a healthy dose of skepticism. However, this thread continues to be full of absolutely bat poop crazy stuff.  |
|
|
|
I expect a lot. For me bitcoin will be the hype of 2016
- Price movements
- A few big webshops accepting bitcoin
- New services for bitcoin
- Much more
Basically the same thing people say and expect each year. Bitcoin will never end up the way most people think it will on these forums. |
|
|
|
|
300-350 range is incoming
|
|
|
|
I was hoping for some trading wisdom, instead we got dreams.
I believe he was giving trading advice if you read between the lines. Nope, he was mostly going on about more nonsense and was followed by others of his ilk, who believe in it as well. Anyone who puts higher faith in dreams are no different than early man who had no understanding of our wondrous existence. Putting faith in dreams is stuff you would expect from your great-grandmother from the motherland. |
|
|
|
Keep digging. The radiation levels experienced by the astronauts via the Van Allen's belts was far less than what people on earth experience working in radiology, nuclear stations or getting certain CT scans. |
|
|
|
I just watched the first one but I can already say that it is quite lame. The guy is just stating "no it wasn't a hoax" as if it was any proof. About the technology, how the hell does he know what tech the government possessed back then? It's a long known truth that the tech we use today is "20 years old" for the military. Sigh...
This thread contains many examples of why scientific literacy is so important.
I don't know that there's much hope for Hyena in terms of readjusting their thought processes.
Given that his/her posts are riddled with absolutes, they don't appear to realize that this undermines their credibility, regardless of the topic.
This displays a fundamental lack of knowledge regarding what our science has discovered about the nature of reality since the mid-1900's.
...
Instead of telling us something useful and educating you keep on sticking insulting labels on me without anything backing them up. You could as well as tell me to fuck off and that I suck which would be the TLDR version of your message. You are either butthurt or trolling, I don't know and I don't care. One part of your text was interesting though. You encouraged people to question themselves  which is not a bad idea by the way. You should do it as well. However, equally important is to question everything external to yourself too. For example, one should always question the official story. Do yourself a favor and research what film technology was available back then. From there, start watching NASA footage, especially the film For All Mankind. Conspiracy theorists seem to only reference a few images that they think have some sort of position on. There is too much real footage to be a fake or a hoax. Sure mankind went to space for political reasons, but who cares, it happened. |
|
|
|
nothing is blacked out. the earth is so much brighter than stars in the background, so you don't see them in this exposure.
Also, earth is much, much bigger on this picture than Moon ever is, apart from the time it's size is exaggerated by being close to horizon, but it is the effect of the atmosphere; there is no atmosphere on the Mooon, hence no "magnifying" effect when close to horizon.
oh please, you didn't just try to explain that picture, it has been proven to be a hoax so many times...  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmnMJoFQHk0Hyena, a poster boy for a generic conspiracy nutjob. |
|
|
|
|
Proof or delete this thread.
|
|
|
|
The shit thing is that now they are talking that bitcoin was used by terrorists to attack Paris. Interestingly, the price has not dropped because of it. I wonder how it plays out.
You know who is talking about bitcoins and terrorism? Bitcoin media. There was no price drop because it has no impact on the bitcoin community at this point. Plus most people are smart enough to realize fiat is the easiest and best funds any terrorist group can use. Non-bitcoin media doesn't care. |
|
|
|
Saving bitcoins for the future it's the best idea, if you can afford it then do it (at least try to save) and i hope that in the near future the price will be increased much more than it is now.
Absoletely not agreed  Blockchaintechnology within banks and companies is a matter of a few years, months even. Once that happens, all the sheeple follow and bitcoin will crash IMO, I hope not, but the little devil on my shoulder keeps shouting that it will  The thing is, to gain consumer trust with big dollars, the banks will need trust worthy miners. Blockchains most impressive feat after being developed is the sheer amount of hashing power that is being put out and the level of trust that its "network" generates. The miners are a fundamental part of the technology and the ideals behind it. I would like to believe the banking system realizes this right now, as it will help with the going mainstream part that it has had such trouble with. This technology is going to make them a mess load of money and it will also allow for a lot of change in this world. |
|
|
|
How can either of you expect to be taken serious when you are linking Icke videos?
He is a complete whack job and has no credibility. In the video David is talking about ISIS and how country's are getting sucked into that war. I know..simpel facts can be very shocking to the sheeple. Ore you are just to young to grasp worlds reality. I may be too young to "grasp worlds reality", but I am also old enough to realize that people like Icke are fully aware that they can exploit the gullibility of people for their own personal gain. Well, that, or he is just nuts. |
|
|
|
|
Another attempt to predict a major bull run?
It just isn't happening in a cyclical nature for bitcoin, that is not how technology develops.
|
|
|
|
2016 Is The Year Of Change --- David Icke https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zr11rzS76x4According to David Icke, 2016 is the last year for the Illuminati to bring NWO. If they fail to create the NWO before 2017 then they will never get another chance. David Icke's June 2014 prediction about them is still spot on. ISIS is just a tool for there greater long-term goals. Let's see how this evil will unfolds. How can either of you expect to be taken serious when you are linking Icke videos? He is a complete whack job and has no credibility. Shit even so, anything better then 99.9% of any retard celebrities or politicians tbh. EDIT: you see the trick that makes them not look like retards is they never speak about anything of important to begin with that contains real context. LOL what? This has nothing to do with celebrities. |
|
|
|
|
