I'm not convinced.  Anyone can photoshop so that certificate is meaningless.  I'm also still curious as to why the domain name information is private.  I've never heard of a legitimate financial entity using privacy on their domain name.  I also have never observed a professional that was running a business call their investors morons. 

Call me whatever you want.  But the bottom line is that this is extremely fish.  You want people to use your remittance service but you have a private domain name, no address, and nobody really knows the identities of the person/persons behind this. 

Why would anyone trust their funds to an unknown entity when they could use bitx.co  that doesn't hide the identities of those involved and are referenced by legitimate new sites like the BBC, Economist, Wall Street Journal, etc...   http://www.economist.com/blogs/baobab/2014/06/cash-transfers-africa  http://www.bbc.com/news/business-31735976  [Suspicious link removed]j.com/moneybeat/2014/07/17/south-africas-payfast-incorporates-bitcoin-as-payment-option/[/url]

Anyone trusting their funds to phantom entities is foolish.

This guy up here explained it.   If some of you dont understand this, it's your issue-  and if you're the same 2 ppl that keep spamming same questions I would rather ppl vote you out of this thread.


Personally, I've lost about 15 BTC- but I know it was a pre-sale and I dont expect a rabbit out of a hat and answers all of a sudden just because the price went below pre-sale.. It was on me and I knew what I was getting into.   I also believe this my chance to double down.