 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
|
Username: whothefuckareyou
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
How this is possible? How come your alt scam you. Unless you want to rid of him. The reason there is no proof. This is just a drama.
|
|
|
|
|
No way Jose!!! You in for a quick game. There are many old and far more deserving members than you.
|
|
|
|
I can assure that not a single satoshi has been paid to the extortion attempt. Everything has been discussed privately using slack and we decided to put down the threads for the time being. Lauda has been doing a great job regarding this matter, I have brought him evidence of me not being guilty of possessing illegal funds. I do think this case has been settled, but many others are not the same opinion. I kindly ask what still needs to be "investigated".
You are saying Lauda and his cohorts attempted to extort an innocent victim under the guise of "sting operation". They even called your mother. After you presented evidence of your innocence. They deleted the threads knowing they did something wrong. Is that right? No, lauda did not call my mother. That's a whole another story Before you and your group tried to extort the victim Zeroxal.
You seem to be very confused. Here's a timeline: -The extortion happened, -The threads were made, -The threads were removed, -Zeroxal and tman began talks. I also wasn't involved in the extortion. You seem to be missing that. I can confirm the above. Please read through the whole story before you direct the fire to minifrij. It was TMAN who called your mother right? TMAN and minifrij are part of the extortion team this is not a different story. They will do what Lauda tells them to do. I'm not the best person to ask about this; I just did as I was asked.
|
|
|
|
After you presented evidence of your innocence. They deleted the threads knowing they did something wrong.
No, this is the other way around. We were asked to remove the threads in order for him to try and prove innocence. Before you and your group tried to extort the victim Zeroxal. You have strong evidence of his involvement of a crime that compiled you to do a sting operation on him. But after his request to you, You and your group deleted the evidence/threads right away just like that. Is that right? He can't prove with the threads on? I can say you and your group doing very shady behavior. I know many rich police in my city doing exactly like this. |
|
|
|
I can assure that not a single satoshi has been paid to the extortion attempt. Everything has been discussed privately using slack and we decided to put down the threads for the time being. Lauda has been doing a great job regarding this matter, I have brought him evidence of me not being guilty of possessing illegal funds. I do think this case has been settled, but many others are not the same opinion. I kindly ask what still needs to be "investigated".
You are saying Lauda and his cohorts attempted to extort an innocent victim under the guise of "sting operation". They even called your mother. After you presented evidence of your innocence. They deleted the threads knowing they did something wrong. Is that right? |
|
|
|
None of these users are marked Red! I dont understand what to make out of this action by Lauda. Requesting DT members to take a clear stance. If account trading is allowed, it should be allowed for all. Else it should be allowed for none. Why this selective judgement? In case, the DT members conclude that it is not allowed, I'm hereby requesting Lauda to remove my Red. In that case, I wont be involved in account trading on BitcoinTalk anymore... A few more examples of account sellers that Lauda/Lutpin has failed to leave negative trust for: achow101blazedmexxer-2KWHshorenazazarbredsn0wyahoo62278grtthegreatEAL (buyer, not a seller) I would like to know why Lauda/Lutpin are not going to leave any kind of a negative trust rating on any of the above. No way Lauda would leave negative feedback to this powerful guys. Lauda was a coward and corrupted woman. She will only leave negative feedbacks to accounts who can't hit him back. An example of this her negative feedback to memorydealer. She was the one who first leave negative to memorydealer. But once memorydealer neg rep her back she remove her negative feedback in instant. @KWH Don't worry about your thread about selling account. Lauda would never leave negative feedback to guys like you. And no way Lauda would leave negative trust to BLAZED he is the reason why lauda is in the Default Trust in the first place. |
|
|
|
|
She was very active poster here in meta. Then suddenly she was gone. She don't post anymore. Anyone know her fate?
|
|
|
|
We are starting to get a few entries into this great prize pool but definitely not as many as i expected.
Come on people, i've seen members here just about selling their souls for a few sats and now there's 4btc on offer!
It's not hard to become a good contender in the competition at this stage either, we don't have hundreds of active members so the odds are if you sign up and post a few great threads, help other members or just bring awareness to a bitcoin related situation then you have a very good chance of taking out one of the prizes.
Congrats in advance to Roger's Alt who would likely win this competition. If you are serious on this 4 btc giveaway make at least 100 winners. You are promoting a bitcoin forum on another bitcoin forum. We don't care if you get few entries. Promote it elsewhere. Roger's alt, no sorry, didn't even know him till i signed up at his forum over a year ago and never met him in person, although a troll like yourself would never believe that now would they, Make 100 winners why? Why not just one winner of 4btc and 2 other runner ups for the other prizes, do you have a better suggestion than just make 100 winnerstheymos would be sad
Theymos was happy to have bitcoin.com promote our news and games site here so why should he be sad? I'm not talking about you. I'm talking about the possible winner. The more winners the more difficult to fake the giveaway. |
|
|
|
We are starting to get a few entries into this great prize pool but definitely not as many as i expected.
Come on people, i've seen members here just about selling their souls for a few sats and now there's 4btc on offer!
It's not hard to become a good contender in the competition at this stage either, we don't have hundreds of active members so the odds are if you sign up and post a few great threads, help other members or just bring awareness to a bitcoin related situation then you have a very good chance of taking out one of the prizes.
Congrats in advance to Roger's Alt who would likely win this competition. If you are serious on this 4 btc giveaway make at least 100 winners. You are promoting a bitcoin forum on another bitcoin forum. We don't care if you get few entries. Promote it elsewhere. |
|
|
|
|
It is very clear that Lauda is abusing his Default Trust power like a dislike button. What Lauda does is unethical and morally unacceptable. His is using is DT and Mod power for his own financial interest. He gave negative feedbacks to reduce his possible competitors for his ACE Campaign.
Bitcointalk Accounts has value. And Lauda remove the value of this accounts by giving them negative feedbacks. Lauda is basically scamming the account owners. If this accounts owners are spammers then banned them.
Lauda does not fit to be in Default Trust nor as Mod. He must be given negative trust or remove from DT. He is diluting the value of red trust.
|
|
|
|
There is not a single DAX 30 or a FTSE 100 company..
False equivalency. In one side : Lauda team consider as monopolize all campaign
What is "Lauda team" and how exactly does it monopolize campaigns? Lauda is only doing this to earn more bitcoins from monopolizing signature campaigns.
And the baseless accusations continue. ACE - Only benefits Lauda and buddies and alts.
ACE predates my involvement in campaigns as a manager, and my involvement with SMAS. The idea behind ACE has no relevance to this. Every single (active) ACE member is verifiably a real person (i.e. coin collector), which can't be said for any other campaign. SMAS - It is only purpose is to bully/force advertisers and to use SMAS members as managers.
We can't neither force nor bully someone to hire people participating in SMAS.
Repost that on your main, why dont you?
They probably have so many accounts that figuring out which one is the 'main' is a tough process.  You can deny all you want. But your actions speaks for itself. Your actions is only further your own interest. If you are a true spam advocate, I dare you to remove yourself from ACE and SMAS. That's the only way for us to believe you are a true spam advocate and not an impostor. |
|
|
|
Lauda is not fit to be moderator and should not be in default trust. It is a conflict of interest. He is using his power as moderator and his default trust power to bully and other signature campaign poster and manager. All his actions is to promote ACE and to monopolize and pacifies other signature campaigns.
Here's the situation : People especially who exist from 2011s on this forum , yelling about bct post quality post ( for example : Danny Hamilton ) so for the solution, staff forum make their own initiative so fight spam and improved post quality forum so Lauda and team build their SMAS and ACE project In one side : Lauda team consider as monopolize all campaign but in other side : Forum post quality get better ( compare if ACE and SMAS never exist ) I'm an advocate of free market system. I'm in favor of fighting spam but not this way. Lauda is not doing this to fight spam only idiots would believe that. Lauda is only doing this to earn more bitcoins from monopolizing signature campaigns. ACE - Only benefits Lauda and his buddies and alts. SMAS - It is only purpose is to bully/force advertisers and to use SMAS members as managers. |
|
|
|
|
Lauda is not fit to be moderator and should not be in default trust. It is a conflict of interest. He is using his power as moderator and his default trust power to bully other signature campaign posters and managers. He is forcing advertisers to use ACE. All his actions is to promote ACE and to monopolize and pacifies other signature campaigns. This guy is corrupt and should not hold this positions.
|
|
|
|
|
Point taken !! I don't usually compare my prices with companies abroad as i don't ship outside of the US on half.com. However, this is what haggling is for !! My price was adjusted to around $4 usd...
|
|
|
|
|
