Bitcoin Forum
September 28, 2025, 08:37:05 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 »
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Tether (USDT) - Is pretending to be audited. on: August 19, 2025, 02:16:06 PM
Yeah, this is exactly the issue with Tether — they love throwing around the word audit when in reality it’s just quarterly attestations. Attestation = they show a snapshot of reserves based on numbers they themselves provide, and an accounting firm basically rubber-stamps it. That’s very different from a full GAAS audit where everything is independently verified from top to bottom.

The crazy part is that people in crypto hear “independent report” and automatically assume it means “audited”. Tether has been promising a real audit since like 2017 and it’s still “coming soon”. Meanwhile, they remain the biggest stablecoin in circulation.

At this point, I think most of us accept USDT is a black box. It works because the market believes it works. But if they ever had to open the books like a public company, we’d either see the truth (good or bad) or the whole thing would collapse. Until then, “attestation theater” is all we’re gonna get.
2  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What would happen to Bitcoin’s value if all countries banned crypto exchanges ? on: August 19, 2025, 02:14:59 PM
Honestly, even if every government tried to ban centralized exchanges at the same time, Bitcoin wouldn’t just disappear. People forget that BTC was already moving around before big exchanges existed — through OTC deals, P2P trades, even simple meetups.

A global ban would definitely hit the price short-term because liquidity would dry up, institutions would panic, and casual users would exit. But long-term, the value comes from the fact that Bitcoin can be transferred peer-to-peer without permission. If exchanges get shut down, decentralized platforms and P2P networks (Bisq, HodlHodl, even DEX liquidity pools) would see a massive spike in use.

So yeah, BTC would take a heavy punch, maybe even crash hard for a while. But “survive”? 100%. The whole point is that it doesn’t need anyone’s approval to function. In fact, such a ban might only strengthen the narrative of Bitcoin being unstoppable.
3  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Taproot is live — anyone noticed any real difference yet? on: July 17, 2025, 11:18:27 AM
So, Taproot’s been activated. Supposed to improve privacy and add cool features, but honestly, I haven’t seen much change so far. Anyone using it regularly? Is it really making a difference or just geek stuff for now?

Feels like if it was a big deal, people would be talking more. What do you guys think?
4  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 1 Million Enough? on: July 17, 2025, 09:58:34 AM
Honestly, investing 1 million naira in BTC trading can be promising if you have a solid strategy and patience. BTC is volatile, but it’s shown good returns over time. If you’re new or lack resources, it might be safer to start small or consider diversifying between physical business and crypto. Just make sure to manage risks well and avoid rushing decisions.
5  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Be a good example — CEO takes his salary in bitcoin. on: July 14, 2025, 01:57:10 PM
That CEO taking his salary in Bitcoin is a big statement. It's not just about a company putting BTC on its balance sheet for profit; it's about the leadership literally putting their money where their mouth is and being 'in the same boat' as shareholders. That's a level of commitment you don't always see.

It makes you wonder if this kind of move by top execs is what we need to really push mainstream adoption. It's one thing for a company to hold Bitcoin, but when the CEO is personally using it for their salary, it speaks volumes about their belief in it as real money.

Do you guys think we'll start seeing more CEOs doing this, or is it still too niche for most? What kind of message does it send to the traditional finance world?
6  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Is the ETH Merge's Full Impact Finally Hitting Altcoins? on: July 07, 2025, 11:08:38 AM
Hey everyone,

Been watching the market closely since the Merge. For a while, it felt like not much changed for altcoins, but lately, I'm seeing some serious shifts. Are we finally witnessing the long-term ripple effects of Ethereum's transition to PoS? Seems like some L1s are struggling to keep up, while others are finding their niche. What are your thoughts? Are we entering a new altcoin paradigm driven by ETH's scalability and security upgrades?
7  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Why Are So Many Users Moving to Cross-Chain Bridges in 2025? Share Your Experien on: June 18, 2025, 10:56:26 AM
Hey everyone,

I've been in DeFi for a while and lately I've noticed a TON of new projects and users moving their assets across different blockchains using cross-chain bridges.
A few years ago, most of us were just using Ethereum or BSC for everything — now it seems like everyone is bridging assets between 3-5 networks almost daily.

What changed?
Is it because of cheaper fees, new features, or just more opportunities on other chains?
Has anyone run into issues with security or delays using bridges?
And do you actually trust newer bridges like Renbridge, or do you stick to the “official” ones?

I'd love to hear about:

Your favorite bridge right now (and why)

The worst/funniest/craziest cross-chain story you had

What risks or red flags to look out for

Where you see the future of cross-chain swaps going

Let's share real stories, good/bad experiences, and help each other out

(Feel free to drop some pro tips for staying safe, or even shout out the best/worst projects.)

Looking forward to your thoughts!
8  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Is Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Really the Future of Finance or Just a Hype? on: June 16, 2025, 10:01:43 AM
Hey everyone,

I've been diving deep into the world of DeFi lately and can't help but wonder — are we witnessing the future of finance here, or is it just another tech bubble waiting to burst?

On one hand, decentralized platforms are offering unprecedented transparency, security, and control over assets. They’re shaking up traditional finance and giving power back to the users. But on the other hand, there are concerns about scalability, regulatory risks, and sometimes just plain hype driving crazy price swings.

What do you all think? Are projects like these the real deal for long-term financial freedom, or is this just a fad driven by speculation and fear of missing out?

Would love to hear your thoughts, experiences, and predictions for DeFi’s future!
9  Local / 跳蚤市场 / Bitcointalk accounts available on: February 22, 2024, 11:52:27 PM
提供各種等級的 bitcointalk 帳戶。請聯絡我的電報 ID @TrustedhereforU 垃圾郵件發送者和詐騙者不會給我發訊息 謝謝
10  Local / Nigeria (Naija) / Bitcointalk accounts available on: February 22, 2024, 06:11:21 AM
Various rank of bitcointalk accounts are available.Contact to my telegram Id @TrustedhereforU


Spammer and Scammers don’t message me


Thank you
11  Economy / Invites & Accounts / Bitcointalk accounts available on: February 22, 2024, 05:46:51 AM
Various rank of bitcointalk accounts are available.Contact to my telegram Id @TrustedhereforU


Spammer and Scammers don’t message me


Thank you
12  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Nine9.ninja - [PonziGame] ★ 400+ BTC Input ★ Altcoins ► Automated ► 125% Return on: December 10, 2017, 04:05:58 PM
>NINE9.NINJA<


The game is relaunching for its 3rd round!

The game will officially launch when the Round 3 Countdown expires!

The game will be using the same address as the 1st round.
Therefore you will see the old investments from the 1st round
displayed upon the Round1 webpage which gives new users an overview
of how trustworthy the game is and has been each round.

Any questions at all, don't hesitate to ask, thanks to all previous and future
players, enjoy the game!
13  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Nine9.ninja - [PonziGame] ★ 400+ BTC Input ★ Altcoins ► Automated ► 125% Return on: February 26, 2016, 10:55:41 PM
Hello ninja! Please rearrange the timer to 100 hours again. I want to invest some coins. I like your game. Thanks.

As there are currently no active transactions
I'll go ahead and change the timer back to 99
hours although as everyone has suggested
the game needs some form of promotion and
the best people to promote the site are the
actual players depositing to keep the game
going, yes some will lose as is the nature of
the game although this can be said about
games such as dice although this game has
no RNG element except for block confirmations.
14  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Nine9.ninja - [PonziGame] ★ 400+ BTC Input ★ Altcoins ► Automated ► 125% Return on: February 22, 2016, 06:21:57 PM
Can someone explain this?

"Progress to next payout: 0.05600000 / 0.05600000" It's been like that for a couple of hours and it has not paid out yet.

This is a bug related to floats, totally forgot
about its appearance in the 1st game, I will
compensate the address for this and add in
the floating point fix.
15  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Nine9.ninja - [PonziGame] ★ 400+ BTC Input ★ Altcoins ► Automated ► 125% Return on: February 21, 2016, 01:38:17 AM
wew please fix this admin .. i send 0.0053 in your wallet and i see only in your site.. daF..

19fY2QtqQotA9zDFbaB7qm1MCXWykGMb74   0.00200000 BTC   0.00250000 BTC
https://blockchain.info/tx/2a5cb6ae61709b6ee1fb996dbdf8e4617bd1da2e19d81cdf89d0a1fccd849089

This is because of the send many you have used,
if you want to deposit multiple lower deposits
please send them as single deposits as send many
to the same address usually isn't supported within
many Bitcoin wallets.

I'll fix it this time although please refrain from
depositing like this again, thanks for playing!
16  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Nine9.ninja - [PonziGame] ★ 400+ BTC Input ★ Altcoins ► Automated ► 125% Return on: February 19, 2016, 07:49:00 PM
admin can you explain what these addresses are? they are constantly receiving btc from your address
1N9Fee2pbrXArtapVJERjkDG1jJtzxbAz6
1Ex9zyKrHe2REVsXaeXjmD76kBwQTEEiRH

or how do your payments work exactly? is there a way to see how much is in the balance at this moment?

1N9Fee2pbrXArtapVJERjkDG1jJtzxbAz6

This is the fee address, the fee is only taken on a payout to a
player when the game has enough balance to cover their payout.

You can read more about this in the OP or on the FAQ pages.

The other address does not belong to me and has no
relation to the game nor has it been used within the game.

The balance will be shown on the main site front page
on the "Progress to next payout: " part, left value being
the current balance and the right being how much is needed
for the next person in line to be paid out.


so your current balance is negative? (-0.00081532)

It can go negative when there are big deposits to
push out transactions, the negative value is because
of multiple transactions being pushed to paid and then
miner fees added after they have been sent out, the
system will always have enough BTC to pay these fees
so will push those transactions to paid, however it does
need to recoup these miner fees therefore there is a
negative value until they are recouped.

This only happens in rare occasions with large deposits
paying out multiple small deposits; in this case the 0.08
deposit paying out ~9+ smaller deposits at once.

I have thought about "fixing" this as it does look a bit odd
but the feedback I have received is players would prefer
their deposits get paid and leave the negative fee
causing value there as an extra "dynamic" of the game.
17  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Nine9.ninja - [PonziGame] ★ 400+ BTC Input ★ Altcoins ► Automated ► 125% Return on: February 19, 2016, 07:33:51 PM
admin can you explain what these addresses are? they are constantly receiving btc from your address
1N9Fee2pbrXArtapVJERjkDG1jJtzxbAz6
1Ex9zyKrHe2REVsXaeXjmD76kBwQTEEiRH

or how do your payments work exactly? is there a way to see how much is in the balance at this moment?

1N9Fee2pbrXArtapVJERjkDG1jJtzxbAz6

This is the fee address, the fee is only taken on a payout to a
player when the game has enough balance to cover their payout.

You can read more about this in the OP or on the FAQ pages.

The other address does not belong to me and has no
relation to the game nor has it been used within the game.

The balance will be shown on the main site front page
on the "Progress to next payout: " part, left value being
the current balance and the right being how much is needed
for the next person in line to be paid out.
18  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Nine9.ninja - [PonziGame] ★ 400+ BTC Input ★ Altcoins ► Automated ► 125% Return on: February 19, 2016, 06:33:47 PM
Wow this ponzi is really still exist? Never saw so old ponzi:)

It is because there has been no scam here.

Simply because the game self sustains itself
with the transactions expiring to lower the
queue length and essentially reset the game.
19  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Nine9.ninja - [PonziGame] ★ 400+ BTC Input ★ Altcoins ► Automated ► 125% Return on: February 19, 2016, 06:30:24 PM
By the way admin, when do you plan on implementing Dogecoin and Litecoin for this?

yes am want DOGE pls ))

Me too, this with doge would be great and would have the list moving so much faster I believe.

This will be added soon, the page is already developed
all that is needed is an address to be generated and
me to let dogecoind sync, this will be the next goal!

Thanks for playing!
20  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Nine9.ninja - [PonziGame] ★ 400+ BTC Input ★ Altcoins ► Automated ► 125% Return on: February 18, 2016, 10:23:23 PM
There is a transaction that has been sent from
a web wallet, I have currently set this to be a
donation to the pool of players not to waste it.

The web wallet address is this:
3376X6m1YX3Jm4J4c2zq8w93VdSnUnZj31
The transaction in question is this:
https://blockchain.info/tx/9b225610935bc15dd696ee57b57472e37ac50be565eb6d8121ee71e49153524e
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!