Less than 1 BTC trading volume on bittrex today. Even Yobit has a little bit more trading volume. (But I assume you still can't deposit/withdraw XMG to/from Yobit)
Yea noticed that. Magi team is working on different fronts but can not release it before its all finished. I just submitted a maintenance request for Magi on Yobit and pointed to the new wallet source - hopefully this will resolve issues with deposits/withdrawls in 1-2 weeks, but we'll see.
|
|
|
Thanks a lot. Can you describe the changes? From looking at the commits: - Added lightsplasher's total balance display
- Fixed automatic wallet update notifications
- Migrated to LevelDB for transaction storage
- Updated checks for PoS blocks
- Updated checkpoint syncing, hopefully eliminating the "checkpoint too old" bug
- Added automatic coin stack merging/splitting (as far as I can tell)
|
|
|
1 year no update for XMG.  That does sound embarrassed; I guess I have more time pulled out from work already. Feel free to shoot me a PM if you need help setting up the automatic update checking with the official site. I'm also not opposed to hosting the update text file in the interim for you guys if that will help. Also, I was planning on adding the following as a pull request some time ago, but life shifted a bit for me and I haven't found the time to do work on it. Here's a link to PayCoin's (sort of hack-y) solution to the "Checkpoint is too old" problem: https://github.com/PaycoinFoundation/paycoin/pull/33. It basically just took out the check for checkpoint age, which is sort of a grey area... but it would definitely calm down the panic about the error popping up in the wallet.
|
|
|
Ran into one I cant find an answer for compiling diamond 2.0.5.7 on Ubuntu 16.04 64 bit armv8
ok another new problem: during linking:
build/scrypt_mine.o: In function 'scrypt(void const*, unsigned long, unsigned int*, void*)': scrypt_mine.cpp: (.text+05c): undefined reference to 'scrypt_core' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Makefile:302: recipe for target 'diamond-qt' failed
I give up for tonight, will wait for new wallet source. diamond.pro or Makefile or src/makefile.unix needs update for armv8 I don't know why I cant figure this out ... tried qmake USE_PNP=1 xARCHCPU=armv7l ...
maybe try this hint from feldenthorn: You'd need to replace any instances of armv7l with whatever your output from the terminal command "uname -p" is. (source: https://bit.diamonds/community/index.php/topic,85.msg510.html#msg510 ) Ahh ... uname -p returns aarch64 did a make clean, qmake xARCHCPU=aarch64 USE_UPNP=1 and make USE_UPNP=1 xARCHCPU=aarch64it's compiling again should take a while ... we shall see ... src/scrypt_mine.cpp: In function 'void scrypt (const void*, size_t, uint32_t*, void*)': src/scrypt_mine.cpp:105:21: error: 'scrypt_core' was not declared in the scope Makefile:2203: recipe for target 'build/scrypt_mine.o' failed around line 80 of src/scrypt_mine.cpp scrypt_core is defined as: extern "C" void scrypt_core(uint32_t *X, uint32_t *V); where is the code for this function i can't find it defined anywhere Built wallet for x86-64 before and never had this problem ... in src there is a file scrypt-arm.S, scrypt-X86.S , scrypt-X86_64.S scrypt_core() appears to be defined in these files ... perhaps with aarch64 no scrypt-*.S file is being selected? how do I fix this Thanks for bringing this up to me via PM, utahjohn. I originally said that whatever returned after using uname -a was fine because we were talking about Raspberry Pis (1 and 2) and the makefile supports both armv6l and armv7l (which are actually identical). It's just not working with any of the previous architecture commands because of the 64-bit OS (see below). Ran into one I cant find an answer for compiling diamond 2.0.5.7 on Ubuntu 16.04 64 bit armv8
ok another new problem: during linking:
build/scrypt_mine.o: In function 'scrypt(void const*, unsigned long, unsigned int*, void*)': scrypt_mine.cpp: (.text+05c): undefined reference to 'scrypt_core' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Makefile:302: recipe for target 'diamond-qt' failed
I give up for tonight, will wait for new wallet source. diamond.pro or Makefile or src/makefile.unix needs update for armv8 I don't know why I cant figure this out ... tried qmake USE_PNP=1 xARCHCPU=armv7l ...
It looks like you guys in the thread have already figured it out: someone will need to write a scrypt-aarch64.S file for everything to work smoothly. Alternatively, I could probably have the wallet fall back to a C++ implementation on unsupported architectures. It would just need to be transparent to the users that their architecture does not perform as well as it might with its own assembly implementation. (That is to say that the performance would be really bad compared to a native solution.) Speaking of performance hits, though, I'm pretty sure one could the ARM version of QEMU to run a 32-bit binary if you just want to run the wallet on an arm64 board. At least until a more robust solution is found. A guide for setting QEMU up on a Raspberry Pi can be found here, but I'm not sure how well that translates to ODROID's boards. You might have to set up ODROID's boards for virtualization (if they support it) and compile QEMU yourself to get things working.
|
|
|
Is Sweet Spot Magi Miner still a thing? Im testing it right now but its last build dates from september (huge block rewards haha). Would like to know if worth it to use it. Thanks! It is still worth using, without a doubt. I assume it hasn't been updated since September because it's stable and there haven't been too many features requested.
|
|
|
It has been some time that I have been mining Magi within my own laptop's Intel Core i5 CPU. However, I'm still not quite sure how this unique block reward works. I have an idea of how it could be but I'm not sure if it is right. I guess the less hashrate you have for mining, the more reward you will get? I need better explanation for this as I really don't understand how it works. Sorry for asking, I just want to know Magi well. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks  The reward function is explained in the "Magi-Reward-V2" and "Necessary to adjust miner efficiency?" sections of this post. If you want a graph of any block's possible rewards based on average hashrate (and block difficulty), you can use the following site to play with the parameters: http://starflakenights.net/crypto/blockreward/xmg.html.
|
|
|
i may have missed 1. confirms on received coins in qt wallet? the amount of confirms it takes before you can spend you coins again after receiving from another address. 2. average reward? mining coins reward coins for the mining involved. staking coins also have rewards. not sure if i missed anything from thread. 1. See first post 2. See first post and my initial reply Hints: mature coins can be spent; reward means reward; interest rate also means reward
|
|
|
curiously "make all" didnt make libmemenv.a, i had to >make libleveldb.a libmemenv.a but... still same error  Ah, yeah, I should have made sure that make all built the libraries and the tests, rather than just the tests. That being said, is Qt Creator linking the leveldb and boost libraries properly? I've never used Qt Creator because command line compilation is just: qmake && make . But, from your pastebin, it looks like it can't find leveldb or boost... so perhaps making sure Qt Creator knows where the libraries are is the answer.
|
|
|
hi , i'm trying to compile an OSX qt but have hit an error. i've tried qt creator 5.2.1 5.3.2 and 5.5.0 the deps in the vertcoin-qt.pro say boost 1.52 i've tried 1.54 and 1.55 macports was playing silly buggers else i would've tried 1.52 as well, but apparently 0.8.6.2 updated code to 1.55 so i figure it's probalby not boost ? my error is a tad excessive http://pastebin.com/PASA0H4pbut here's the tail end .... std::_Rb_tree<std::string, std::string, std::_Identity<std::string>, std::less<std::string>, std::allocator<std::string> >::_M_insert_unique(std::string const&) in libleveldb.a(env_posix.o) std::_Rb_tree<std::string, std::pair<std::string const, leveldb::(anonymous namespace)::FileState*>, std::_Select1st<std::pair<std::string const, leveldb::(anonymous namespace)::FileState*> >, std::less<std::string>, std::allocator<std::pair<std::string const, leveldb::(anonymous namespace)::FileState*> > >::_M_insert(std::_Rb_tree_node_base*, std::_Rb_tree_node_base*, std::pair<std::string const, leveldb::(anonymous namespace)::FileState*> const&) in libmemenv.a(memenv.o) ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
Why is it using leveldb to compile? Shouldn't you be using berkeley db for bitcoin-esque coins, particularly bdb 4.8, and if you're using another version you have to configure using --with-incompatible-bdb flag? Because leveldb is part of the sources. To answer the original question, it looks like QT Creator isn't compiling leveldb for you, so it's probably easiest to pop open your terminal, navigate to vertcoin/src/leveldb, and run a make all.
|
|
|
No confirmations, not even send from Cryptsy. It's residing in their wallet. They have not enough in hot wallet to payout. Also maybe a problem with their cold wallet. Look at all the 4 links above for more info. You do realize that all those links, except the post about recent withdrawl issues, are about events from 1-2 years ago, right? Just file a support ticket if you haven't already and they will probably get back to you in a day or so.
|
|
|
testcc90cc 38,801 106.919 Confirmed 954.467146 Unconfirmed 9.501803
I don't know why big share mining but only a little...
Are you asking why such a large hashrate is producing so few coins? The block reward adjusts according to the network hashrate, rising to a certain point, then quickly dropping if the hashrate gets too high. You can check out a plot of the block reward function on this site. Just keep in mind that the reward calculation is based on the hashrate over time, not the instantaneous hashrate.
|
|
|
cryptonit
what is DMD bootstrap and what difference from Full Blockchain?
Basically, Bootstrap.dat allows you to import a portion of the blockchain incredibly quickly by bypassing the peer downloading requirement. It's essentially identical to someone posting their copy of the blockchain for you to download. When all the blocks are "bootstrapped" in, your client continues downloading blocks (newer than those in the bootstrap file) from peers as it normally would. For a slightly more in-depth explanation, here's the Litecoin wiki page for Bootstrap.dat.
|
|
|
Joe, There's actually an issue with retrieving the version.txt file that's up on coinmagi.org - it's inaccessible via the Qt curl method because of the mod_security permissions for the server. Instead of sending the version information, the site spits back an HTML-based error message. The error is detailed in the latter half of a new pull request. The other half of the pull request makes version checking a little more robust. Since it wasn't immediately obvious to me why the client wasn't reporting that a new version was available, I figured I might as well tidy up some loose ends in the code. Previously, significantly lower program versions could trigger the Update warning. -- If you want to test the success of the version.txt retrieval, I also added a console printout in src/qt/updatecheck.cpp (line 40) for debugging. If the mod_security problem ends up giving you trouble, uncommenting that line as well as the iostream include on line 6 enables the printouts. It appears that the issue can probably be resolved by adding a few lines to ./.htaccess on the server, but that might not be ideal. I'm not entirely sure what the mod_security filtering does, but it might be important. Edit: You can also use http://starflakenights.net/crypto/magiversion/version.txt for an example of what should be going on. Not sure why my web space is more permissive than the official site. Changing the retrieval URL in the code makes everything work as intended.
|
|
|
According to their thread: UPDATE
Staisybit will be kept offline in next days for development (we are going to come up as a stable service afterward).
|
|
|
I feel like this would appeal to a fairly small market. In my mind, dolls and clothing and whatnot work out for established brands because they are based on an already popular franchise (as you see with TV/movie -> toy/game/clothing line transitions). Coming into it with just the idea that it exists is probably not going to bring in any significant income.
So... If you want to make something out of your idea, I would suggest creating enjoyable content and publicizing that before monetizing it.
|
|
|
That looks neat, closed source though I presume?
There are source links on the download page. As I recall, the project was originally closed-source, but the author open-sourced it to give back to the community.
|
|
|
I've noticed for pages now that you are frequently taking about SweetSpot, but what is it ? A software that improve mining ? Or something else ?
The Sweet Spot Miner ( Official Magi site mirror, out of date) is a program (written in Delphi, I think?) that manages your hashing power (so you don't waste energy mining when the rewards are low). From the link above: Sweet Spot Magi Miner is able: - to hide the miner window so it will not waste your taskbar space.
- to hide itself into the system tray while running.
- to start the miner at LOW priority so the miner will not slow down your work.
- to check the current Network Hashrate and control the miner CPU usage targeting the Sweet Spot 22MH/s the Hash Rate you choose.
- to check the current Block Value and control the miner CPU usage targeting 12+XMG/Block the Block Value you choose.
And here's a screenshot of the interface, if you're curious: 
|
|
|
When i opening Litecoin setup, i receive an error: Win 10 x64 How can i fix?  Do you have a previous installation of Litecoin wallet? No! Since no one has given more helpful advice, have you tried the "Run as Administrator" option from the context (right-click) menu?
|
|
|
Why does the block explorer state "WARNING: Checkpoint is too old. Wait for block chain to download, or notify developers. " Probably that wallet is not the latest; checkpoints recently updated in v1.2.3. Actually, the site is reporting version 1.2.3.0. Maybe the issue with checkpoints isn't actually fixed? Edit: here's a blurb from the HoboNickels Troubleshooting GuideWhat does "Warning Checkpoint too old" mean? This message is a warning and in most cases is ok to ignore. The only time a user should see this is during and possibly after the initial network block download. Stop and Restarting the client should clear the message. However verifying you are on the correct block and checkpoint by looking at getinfo and getcheckpoint and comparing both values against a different external source, are usually enough to ensure you are running correctly.
This message could also show up if the checkpoint server was turned off or no checkpoints are issued with in the allotted time frame. This again can be ignored safety if you double check your current block count with some external source. If there are more serious issues with your client, a global warning will be issued and your wallet will further direct you on what to do.
|
|
|
|