 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
is there a bug in how cluster performance is calculated? Just saw it spike to 240Ghash/s, and now its free falling back down to 70
Yes you are right, this is the "known" bug, it sometime jumps up for a couple of minutes and then goes back to normal, but slush didn't have time to fix it yet, because he had more urgent programming to do. |
|
|
|
The CPU mining in poclbm runs the same OpenCL code as runs on the GPU, so it will never be as efficient as something coded specifically for the CPU. But, if there is demand I could make it so that you can pick to use poclbm or RPCminer from within the same GUI. I would want to get permission from puddinpop but there's no reason this can't happen. works great up till now, no GPU performance lost, i like and use it.
The cpu option gives me only 50 % of the output from the RPCminer-cpu client, for cpu i keep using RPCMiner. (maybe in update version better?)
I am new to this forum and i didn't know about asking permission, i made the dos-gui/windows for poclbm and rpcminer because i didn't want to type the same commands over and over again, i hope i didn't offend anybody with it. |
|
|
|
|
works great up till now, no GPU performance lost, i like and use it.
The cpu option gives me only 50 % of the output from the RPCminer-cpu client, for cpu i keep using RPCMiner. (maybe in update version same or better?)
|
|
|
|
Already am - I just have it tied to slush's pool since I didn't want to wait months for the block to be (possibly) found.
on my amd athlon2 x2(2 cores) cpu i get 2600 khash/s, on the amd phenom2 x6 (6 cores)cpu you will get around 7800+ khash/s, is it worth it? you deside. |
|
|
|
If it's MSI you could put installer source along with the included binary files somewhere. Otherwise it's just another executable without source.
You can read any MSI using Orca. Or you could rename it to ISM and open it in InstallShield. or use the free Insted for looking into the msi http://www.instedit.com/Orca is free as a part of the free Windows SDK. orca downloadable at http://www.technipages.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/orca.Msi |
|
|
|
If it's MSI you could put installer source along with the included binary files somewhere. Otherwise it's just another executable without source.
You can read any MSI using Orca. Or you could rename it to ISM and open it in InstallShield. or use the free Insted for looking into the msi http://www.instedit.com/ |
|
|
|
Is the source for this available? I'm behind my work firewall ATM so I can't access the file right now.
It installs all the files in a directory you specify or the default, and you can see/acces/change all sources in that directory Download BitcoinMinerInstaller:http://www.4shared.com/file/naJu4Ltw/setupBitcoinMiners.html |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Pooled Miner installer for windowsThe installer installs the lastest CPU/GPU Miners, Poclbm and RPCMiner-cpu with a startmenu. You only need your Bitcoin Pooled Mining Account/Worker/Password and choose a miner in the menu to start. The installer makes a desktop icon and a windows menubutton to startup the menu You can start multiple miners from the same menu with different account settings. Installer: StartMiners:  Download BitcoinMinerInstaller:http://www.4shared.com/file/naJu4Ltw/setupBitcoinMiners.html
|
|
|
|
|
Yes your right, but you can change it to whatever you need, all ideas are welcome for next version
|
|
|
|
Does anybody know what just happend to the Ghash/s rate, it more than doubled just like that to 134,531Ghash/s for several minutes, i believe its back to 60 Ghash/s again now.
This is known bug in hash meter, but I don't plan to fix it now. I'm focused on pushwork now as it is the only way how to handle rising load and open registrations back again. I am glad its just a known bug, so i don't have to worry about the worst that could be happening. |
|
|
|
Does anybody know what just happend to the Ghash/s rate, it more than doubled just like that to 134,531Ghash/s for several minutes, i believe its back to 60 Ghash/s again now. I saw this happening in the past couple of days, yesterday it jumped from 55Ghash/s to 90Ghash/s, but its only for a couple of minutes, then it jumps back. The last jump was to 211.000Ghash/s and 1014 getworks, around 16.30 UTC  |
|
|
|
I wanted to know how much my gpu power consumption is and how much i pay per year for mining bitcoins. I took the power consumption of a overclocked 5970, running for 24 hours per day for a year. overclocked 5970 = 476 watt/per hour x 24 hours x 365 days = 4169760 / 1000 = 4169,76 kWh per year x 0,3 dollar = $1250,93 per year The electricity cost is based on dutch electricity included tax and transport cost (1kWh = around $0,30). A 5970 would cost $3,43 per day on electricity extra on my electricity bill. This doesn't sound much per day, but per year its $1250,93 extra on my elec bill. The cost of mining is not cheap. power consumption chart for ati and nvidia gpu cards: http://bit.ly/gb5XJp |
|
|
|
Woke up to see that my miners had been working all last evening on the same 10 hour block. Amazing! And my payout is well below the average for me, at 0.00819707 BTC. I assumed as I was reading that I would have a much better payout because the round had lasted so long, and others dropped out, so my shares would be worth more. Did anybody else have an odd payout for block 109071, either better or worse than normal?
I looked it up, but my payout for block 109071 is the same as other blocks, no freak payout here. |
|
|
|
i guess that everyone is getting a lot of invalids, so in the end it doesn't affect your total score/payout, only a lot of bogus calculations for your cpu/gpu and useless network traffic
Everybody gets their fair share of the solved blocks. However, the total performance of the pool is lower than it could have been, so the daily payout to everybody who participates in it is less. Oke, everybody get a fair share of solved blocks, and now everybody get a fair/unfair share of random increased invalid/stales so the question is do we lose money in the end or does it remains the same payout as before, due to the increase of invalid/stales. i don't know how the poolserver does this math or does this math at all, but generaly spoken if every body get a fair share of the good and the bad, the total must be the same percentage payout overall, but thats my guess. I dont know how the source code is written. |
|
|
|
|
i guess that everyone is getting a lot of invalids, so in the end it doesn't affect your total score/payout, only a lot of bogus calculations for your cpu/gpu and useless network traffic
|
|
|
|
|
