heres an idea for ya though, instead of punishing users for trying to make a goddamn dollar, why not punish the freaking campaign managers that basically have users spam the fuck outta the place? 100 posts a week, hmm im pretty sure ppl are gonna try n get those posts any way possible.(bit-x, dadice) if you want reasonable posting then dont have unreasonable requests in the campaigns. sure 100 posts in a week is possible, but from how many users? not very many.
Why punish the sig campaign managers? I agree they should be doing more to curb spam but it's the users who choose to abuse it so you cannot possibly pass the blame on to them. Should the owner of an all You Can Eat restaurant be punished because a greedy pig comes in an eats all the food he possibly can then pukes all over the place, or is that the greedy pigs fault? I make 100 posts a week no problem and there are many others who make much more than that but of course there are always people who try make as many as they can thus diluting their quality but that is a decision they make and have to deal with the consequences.
i also wanna know how ppl like marcotheminer get 10 day bans for basically the same as me and i get 14 days? no justice here at all.
Marco was banned for sending a few unsolicited PMs not spamming the forum.
candy was thrown in my face and im punished for trying to get it.
Learn some restraint then. It's perfectly ok for people to make many posts as long as they put some effort in. If people start slacking and getting lazy then they'll probably get punished but I don't see why everyone should be just because of a few.
look through the yahoo62278 accounts posts. 14 day ban is a bit extreme IMO. as i stated im sure a few posts were spammy, but damn sure not 60 and damn sure not enough to warrant a 14 day ban. im requesting this ban be lifted as if you look at my history ive never done 1 thing wrong til now apparently
Show Posts
