4 million dumped so far... I have another 16 million to get rid of once price gets up around 600 sats again.... so please keep buying! It's the perfect time to buy up big! 

I found NOMP  the easiest to implement (search github), you'll have to make some minor changes to the code to get it up and going though, especially if you want to mine the groestl algo. We just use it on a spare local machine for our miner network and it's been running without issue for about a month so far, so should be no prob on a hosted box.

I'll gladly cop that on the chin, was on my phone at 3 in the morning and didn't check the date (lack of sleep and stupidity on my part)... Could you refer me to the "ominous post about rebranding" that was being referred to then? As it would seem my post is no less valid if there's another rebranding exercise on the horizon... I'll be happy to withdraw my "fud" if I'm chomping on the wrong end of the stick though.

"ominous" is the perfect way to describe the posts.... And I don't think it's an omen of anything good unfortunately... Here is the link to the post for anyone who's interested....

https://www.reddit.com/r/Digibyte/comments/21fa73/should_we_rebrand_digibyte/

Digibyte dev team and Jared seem to have lost all direction, and are hoping the community can solve the issue for them. Problem is, when people give them the sobering advice they really need to hear, they go quiet for a while, then release another poll or forum question suggesting some other half baked idea... If Jared was even slightly serious about any of these idea's why didn't he purchase Digibyte.org (for the fictional DGB foundation) for the measly 300 bucks it was selling for on Sedo until recently :/

One minute there's talk about starting up a foundation, the next, it's a re-branding... What next?.... I get a mental image of a bunch of devs running around the DGB office with blind folds on yelling warmer, colder, warmer, colder at each other hoping one of them runs into a non-existent roadmap for DGB's future. It seems to be the season for forking, and IMO maybe that wouldn't be such a bad thing for the community should it happen to DGB, if its custodians can't get themselves together, and take charge of DGB's future.

While alot of people are calling fud on these kinds of comments, I think atleast this part of the comment is a very real concern for longterm holders (myself included). Whom ever this person/company is, they currently hold 22% of DGB's currently circulating coins... You can deny it all you want, but the sobering fact is that when those 2Billion coins are dumped (and they WILL be at some point) even the 21 million I hold won't be worth a fart in a can anymore. To think that this person will just trickle them into the market with no noticeable impact on price is naive.... My guess is that 2 Billion coin dump will come well before anywhere near a $1/DGB price is achieved.  

Choose your exit and choose wisely!

Alex Green (the scammer who purchased Mintpal) fled the scene after stealing nearly 4000BTC from people like yourself, and has since been arrested on rape charges, I'm afraid your DGB are likely lost forever mate... If you check that address on Digibyte blockchain explorer you'll see you now have a balance of 0 on that address. https://digiexplorer.info/address/D6DqwtUw4NountWNnZPhs2sTJLbU4HwPYf

This +10! I am becoming increasingly disenchanted with the Digibyte Dev Team.... I hold nearly 20 million DGB and price movement is not my concern right now, nor do I have any motive to push the price down as I bought most of my coins in the 50 sat range and have been mining DGB for years, so spare me any sh*t about this post being fud... I can dump at just about any price and I'll make a very nice profit either way... Price and/or profit is not my motive in making this post.

Issues seem to abound with the development team when it comes to maintaining the projects surrounding Digibyte, and to be frank, I am starting to wonder what, if any real talent exists within the team. Rather than fix the DGB Gaming wallet, a work around to get your coins out of the wallet has been released. I mean, seriously, WTF? Is the dev team so inept they don't know how to fix their own source? What other conclusion could one come to?... The Digibyte Gaming section on the blog on Digibyte.co has ZERO content in it, let alone any announcement about issues, what those issues are, the timeline for fixing such issues etc etc.

Digibyte's own mining hub, digihash.co, STILL doesn't have groestl mining, and hasn't since segwit implementation... Again, nothing on Digibyte.co's blog about the issue, nothing on Digihash.co about the issue, or any other place you'd expect a team with their finger on the button would make such issues known, along with what they're doing about it.... Heck, even the front page of Digihash.co still says "mine all 5 algorithms!" Again, WTF??? Do DGB developers not know how to implement mining on their own algo's???

It's really hard to cheer for DGB these days, when the core team behind seem to be either A) Not bothered, or B) Unable to, maintain or fix anything outside of a basic wallet.

Fact is, sometimes the truth hurts.... Some people will acknowledge the truth and take measures to rectify the issues, others will hide their heads in the sand, and others will become defensive and deny those truths at any cost. Which one of those people are you Digibyte Team? Start using that thing they call a website to communicate openly about issues, changes, timelines etc with your community and newcomers. If you post on YouTube, put the godamn video on your website, it takes 5 minutes to do so. Don't make the people who support you chase you around various forums and telegram teams trying to get answers. Are you developing to take on the world, or are you a two-bit operation with an obscure presence that only people who spend hours tracking down fragmented information can be a part of?

It sucks to watch something you've put so much faith in go to the dogs due to ineptitude, laziness or lack of direction.... I don't know which it is, but the reason isn't the issue at hand... What DGB Dev Team are going to do about it IS the issue.... Rant over....

Gotta love that "ignore" button

Here are some nodes another forum member was kind enough to give me...

176.31.126.191
5.19.171.173
75.85.106.243
73.185.110.166
76.186.21.112
104.245.96.144
52.191.143.188
5.228.233.54
204.68.122.4
5.105.37.151
107.11.250.91
104.238.176.185
77.77.46.250
31.53.91.44
136.243.217.171
98.29.7.46
45.55.148.6
104.237.4.26

Sync will take a few hours in my experience... atleast it's not 3 years Failing that I can put a bootstrap on one of our servers when I get back to work in a couple hours

I also had probs finding a block using the NOMP and UNOMP pool gits with the current wallet version... I did get it all up and running and all my rigs were connecting and hashing properly, just never seemed to find a block even though I have a good amount of hashing power. In the end I switched back to an existing pool because the wasted hashes were going to cost me more than if I'd just kept mining on a fee pool. I'd also be interested to hear any solutions, or atleast some idea of the problem if anyone can shed some light.

That said.... It's a little bit disappointing that even Digihash doesn't have groestl mining anymore, and IMO it just adds to the existing frustration people are feeling about potentially great DGB projects (DigbyteGaming, Digihash) having an "unfinished air" about them. I voted no in the Digibyte Foundation poll on Twitter specifically for this reason. DGB has alot of potential, and that's why I've been investing in, running fulltime nodes, and mining it for a couple years now, but the dev team really need to up their game on the issues at hand, rather than start another half-baked project... I say this only because I'd like to see DGB reach it's potential as a top player in the cryptosphere, not to bash the coin.

I can probably give you a hand Greytut, have got solo mining working with most miners in the past so maybe a second set of eyes will help.... Whats your mining software config look like at the moment?

Thanks guys, I'll give them both a shot when I get back to work tomorrow and report back, might help anyone else who is running NVIDIA rigs...

Thanks for the heads up Adaseb, I couldn't find a decent CUDA based PascalLite miner that supports stratum, hence the solo mining approach. FairPool suggests SGMiner which I find doesn't hash well with the latest Cuda cards either.... I've mentioned my specs and software in the reply above.... Any suggestions appreciated.

Hi Ulfsaar, multiple rigs, all identical specs as follows... i7 6800k (find better hashrates on some coins using PCE 3.0 risers and a CPU with enough PCIE lanes to facilitate a minimum of 4 lanes per slot hence the overkill), Windows 10 64bit, 4 x OC'd GTX 1080's per motherboard (PCIE 3.0 slot per GPU) with CUDA v8 drivers. I was running the latest binary wallet for Windows, and tried both the CUDA miner offered on page1 of this thread and the miner I currently use on Pascal Coin (PascalCoin SPMod1). I was running one wallet with one instance of miner (multiple GPU's) per system.

I've currently reverted all my rigs, I'd be happy however to throw a few back onto PascalLite and test again if you have any suggestions.

Cheers

I got my miners up and running and have been hashing about 60GH/s for nearly 20 hours and haven't found a single block, unluckiest miner in the history of crypto it seems.... Only FairPool ever seems to find blocks looking through the blockchain, which means either nobody is solo mining or something isn't right, I'm guessing the latter.....  So I wouldn't hold my breath if you're solo mining.

Interesting Stat: Right now FairPool is reporting 400GH/s for it's pool, with total PascalLite network hash being just over 700GH/s... Yet FairPool is STILL the only one finding blocks! Atleast 40 percent of blocks should be being found by the other 300GH/s that are also mining however no one else has found a block...

Just reverting all my rigs back to the coins I was previously mining  

Cheers BrunoS! I'm trying to get the Cuda Solo Miner (From forum page 1) running but I get a non descript windows system error and it shuts down... Oddly the benchmark exe's do work. Running Windows 10 with GTX 1080ti's.

Essentially I've just copied the miner and run the file, is there something I'm missing or are there some instructions somewhere I can follow to check I'm doing things correctly?

1. I have the pascal lite wallet running with default options set.
2. I am able to Telnet to port 4009 on localhost and am receiving miner notifications so wallet looks good to go.
3. Double click one of the EXE's in the cuda miner folder.
4. Get a Cudart32_80.dll file missing error so I've copied the file from the "benchmarks" folder to the main folder.
5. Try an exe again... CMD window opens, seems to be reading my GPU correctly.... I get a mining on Device #0 and a "last error: no error" in the CMD window...
6. PascalCoinCUDA has stopped working Windows notification pops up and I have to close the program

Any help appreciated!

Hi all, just getting started with PascalLite, here's my pubkey, could I get an account please?

3GhhboqbqQ2cC4nGzBcM9pRH89JUJjK8kLAW3acDnpJtTH3TRvVikBosotP4F7SyBzRzgqLQpzBN3NS TESNCHyrrBTg7KCD2Ku44z5

While I'm at it, I'm guessing you'll be able to get accounts via the wallet in future yes?

That sounds like a great idea! I've run up a few online wallets on servers in different geographic locations, I'd be happy to share them aswell.

Hi all,

I'm trying to find as many fulltime DGB nodes as possible, but the lists I HAVE found seem to be outdated, and the DGB live nodes map never seems to be working :/

Can anyone help out?

Good stuff, much appreciated!