Bad Bit Coin/Vik has a habit of ignoring actual evidence, even when it's pointed out to him. He has never addressed this point, which I've argued to him, that on Bad Bit Coin it says:

"They [GAW] are accused of reneging on contracts, there is no evidence of this."

Okay, but I ran a story at CoinFire that GAW is being sued for breach of contract. So a lawsuit in federal court alleging breach of contract with evidence including an unpaid bill is somehow not evidence of "reneging on contracts."

Fascinating!

No, that's not slander. Just stupidity.

I wanted to post this on Hash Talk, but even though I registered days ago, I'm still not allowed to post. So I'll post it here:

If Bad Bit Coin/Vik's thesis is correct about some blog (CoinFire) having mighty currency-crushing powers, why would you sit on this so-called "a-bomb?" Or is this "a-bomb" on the same plane as the "top legal firm" and "most feared lawyers" or whatever other promises/threats that have not materialized?