I was going to go more abstractly into what the matter of the universe is, because I have unifying theory on that which I think will be breakthrough.
You mind is like a rare orchid blooming in a quagmire, a beautiful bird trapped in a menagerie of farm animals. Please pay no attention to the neophytes and B-listers, nor to the effluvium discharged by their ego-driven loquaciousness.
Now I must share with you that I was stuck recently by such an afflatus that the tenebrous nature of the universe was illuminated, as though God shone a light to the aphotic depths of cosmic understanding. The unifying theory I pieced together from that moment is not only a breakthrough, but of such breaking breakthroughyness that it is more properly a breakthrough-n-beyond.
Btw, my future elucidation will explain why this is required else the universe would need to have a fixed, absolute origin and edge...
Yes, beyond the figurative edge of the universe (for literately the universe must have no edge <yet I must waste valuable time to make these parenthetical remarks, for without them, the b-listers become confused in their nullibicity, opining relentlessly in their dungeons of inferiority>).
and thus could not exist (would collapse into an infinitesimal point), but that is not elucidation is not necessary for the point we need to discuss now.
Indeed, but I must interject: for if the universe were an infinitesimal point, and nothing beyond it exists, then would it not equally be infinite in magnitude? Does not the measure of measures becomes sensibly nonsensical? Unquizzically quizzical?
That is all I can muster for today, for it is with great pains that I must wade through the drudgery of the other comments in this thread.
I have said what I have come to say.
I shall now leave this forum never to return.