Based on today's news I guess this was a correct assumption... 😀

Nothing on telegram at the moment but there is still time left in the day.
Side question..
Does anyone know if the masternode deployment will require independent VPS or if they will house that on their side through the dashboard? Still anxiously awaiting the updates just as everyone else.

Hi new here recently bough PURA after looking at the new wallet.
Seems like you guys have some wierd beef related to missing a swap.
As someone that has missed other swaps in the past I feel your pain but get over it dude. You can't blame others for your inability to keep up with your coins.
IN REGARDS TO THIS NEWS
A Canadian stock listing where an asset swap includes crypto. I don't know about you but that sounds f%$&ing amazing.
I'm buying more 

So what you are saying basically is that in order to earn interest my BTC I need to first purchase BCC which in essence increases transaction volume for BCC while also reducing the supply. At the moment $384/BCC with a circulating supply of $1.8 billion. When it was at it's hig
h over $10 billion while the BTC price was +/- $6000 and a market cap of $100 billion. If it is estimated that 25 percent of BTC has been lost then at this time the BTC market cap would have been $75 billion available. Can you tell me how this math is possibly correct. If what you are saying is true then you are basically telling me that BCC tokens at one point represented more than 10% of BTC. This is just basic math. Again I'm not pointing fingers just trying to understand the logic.

Does anyone else find it odd that the marketcap dropped do to massive selling at the same time that the difficulty levels on coins like dash hit all time high's? I wonder if this is the calm before the storm in terms of not paying on contracts. If the contract cycle is in line with a 90 day payout then I do not see how the next cycle is possible without simply relying on new member contracts to fuel existing returns. I'm not trying to raise any flags but it feels very much like what happens at the end of a Ponzi cycle..
Look at the difficulty level here and start your chart in August until today. Currently 2 petahash up from 25 terahash...
https://www.coinwarz.com/difficulty-charts/dash-difficulty-chart
And the sell off at the end of October
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitconnect/
Like I said I'm not an authority on this but the math is tough.

Been here since round 1 of the ICO and have been holding ever since. I believe in this product. The global online betting market is estimated at $3 Trillion per year. I have been in igaming for 10 years and have never seen an environment that is as difficult as this one. New regulations in the EU and other parts of the world are going to make sports betting very difficult moving ahead. Does anyone know if Wagerr has any plans to be AML, KYC compliant. Even capturing a small percentage of the market will be huge especially for masternode. I'm just curious if there will ultimately be IP restriction etc.
Thoughts?

I like 4grinz.com for slots because they give 10% back on losses straight to your wallet which to me is better than a bonus. Dadice.com for dice as they are prov fair and always fast. I also really like their level system because it makes you feel like a hi roller the more you play. I was on fortunejack last week but they went down due to a ddos attack. Not to say that its uncommon but I would have thought that they could handle that sort of thing based on their size. Anyway those are my favorites right now.

I was recently in French Guiana where i saw a "international" lottery presented in one of the street books. They only took cash but I went ahead and asked them about Bitcoin as well. They had not f*king clue what I was talking about but said that in most countries in South America the lotto crosses borders regardless of the currency. I know that there are quite a few "international" lotteries out there. Does anyone have any face to face experience to confirm the process? Amy wins? How does that even work when you are not there?

Pretty sure here the whole point here is that this "person" never had an account or any way to show that he did. They called out everything that he threw at them including block verified transactions... Feels more like "bigboy" is another casino or something. Either way it is kind of like dealing with terrorist demands. You start with a sandwich and next thing you know and its a private jet full of cash and pornstars Even casinos need to have ethics. I'm with 4grinz here.   

agreed. give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. take a fisherman to Vegas and he will bet his boat on red 23...
It's entertainment people! I put my monthly gambling budget on the same line as beer, chips, and my netflix subscription. Seriously how many professional gamblers have you met? Right up there with Christopher Walken in the deer hunter. Not to say that I condone Russian roulette but rather that roulette sometimes keeps me from blowing my brains out Its all about a break from reality.   

Right. This goes back to my conversation with Betchain as well. Baccarat, Aztec Magic etc are all available on their site (30 or so) as provable fair as well. HOWEVER THEY SUCK and are really boring one dimensional games. On the flip side as Dean is actively advertising his casino for sale I can see the need to expand beyond dice. The big providers that have the really interactive games have not moved on this issue.Maybe we should reach out and ask them why.I'll email softswiss and ask direct. Maybe others could reach out to the providers as well.

Here is yet another example
https://www.bitcoinpenguin.com/system/comfy/cms/files/files/000/000/040/original/Bitcoinpenguin_RNG_Certificate_26062014_1.pdf

I would go out on a limb and say that these guys are relatively large despite being new. They actively advertise on their main page www.bitcoinpenguin.com that they are provably fair and to prove it show the exact same itech certificate that 4grinz was talking about from coingaming

In reality the same games that pocket rockets has hand selected are really the only ones that have this option. Everything else is based on this certificate and again are exponentially more fun to play.
It can also be seen with the providers (same) at places like unibet ($300 million per year revenue)
https://www.unibet.co.uk/terms#section-12

and

bovada formerly bodog
https://poker.bovada.lv/get-started/poker-security

Because you are actually playing on the providers platform NOT the casino's. I do not think the casino can actually change or even access the game while it is running.Its basically an API.

Here you go:
http://www.softswiss.com/software/
http://www.softswiss.com/company-news/softswiss-certified-by-itech-labs/

I think I understand where 4Grinz misunderstanding is coming from. It looks like they only use the large providers ie. Endorphina, BetSoft, Play'n'Go etc. The reason that they are saying that their slots are not provably fair is because the big providers do not offer this option at all because they don't need to AND it would be really hard to. They are independently tested as they said etc.This was also confusing to me because I have played on Betchain in the past and saw some of the same games.I reached out to them because the "cool" "fun" games that fox mentioned did not have the option to test and it looks like they are playing dumb because they are projecting themselves as provably fair casino when in reality I think that most of their revenue will slowly change to the "cool""fun" games. Here is my ticket:
http://imgur.com/gallery/eIOKPyw/new

So in the end I feel like this goes back to Fox's comment. Most major online casinos have been trusting these providers for years. I do not think that any of the casino's offering these games would even be able to modify the spin as the feed comes straight from the provider. If you think you have the math skills I would love for someone to break down the variable options on a game like "who spun it"https://www.betchain.com/games/betsoftgaming/375  Either way this really has nothing to do with the 4Grinz main info feed. I am suggesting a new thread on this where everyone can weigh in.
 

Isn't the point of a Forum to listen.
Yes I have 0 posts
I stumbled upon this thread while looking into some details on a new slot promotion by play'n'go which is used at hundreds on online casinos both regular and BTC

Yes I am a slot guy. As someone that has done well in the online gaming world I can tell you that these games both online and in physical casinos generate about 60-70% of the houses money.

I don't like talking trash but as someone who enjoys statistics and gaming found it interesting that of the 10 or so people associated with this thread 5 or more of you all work together and a 50% "player" edge just doesn't seem fair.
Now if you would like to talk about the PF stall method I'm all ears.
Otherwise you and Canton can go back to making printed holiday bitcoin wallets.

You guys are going a little far with this no?

As an outsider looking in I would like to point a "probably unfair" team up of associated board members on this particular thread.
Its fascinating to me that
Dooglas
tryphe
EBK1000
webcris
TigerTatas
 
All coincidentally seem to also be working on the clam client together and obviously have strong dice affiliate associations if not tier 2 direct affiliates
As someone who cans how you how to utilize the server stall method to prevent responding to a client seed I think the following should be noted:

For bunch of smart developers you basically suck at converging on your "enemy"

Although dice respectfully founded and created the bitcoin gaming experience as most things it has been surpassed by the real deal vegas pros that have been developing games since Jimmy Hoffa got buried under Jersey Stadium

Disclaimer: I am an affiliate at both "provably fair" and non provably fair casino including 4 grinz, Satoshibet, Nitrogen, Jetwin and other bitcoin sports books.
If they are pushing slots then they can rig the outcome if they so please. If they are using the big providers like Endorphina, Betsoft, Play n Gothen they need to put up about $100k to get going. In the old days any CS major could develop a game (which is why they needed system like PF to show their fairness because REAL GAMES COST REAL MONEY) that the BTC community would analyze the hell out of until gangs of programmer douchbags ganged up on them with some alternate motive in mind. Such as consistently calling out well developed casinos in order to cast a white light on games like just dice. Don't get me wrong Just Dice is cool as is Satoshi as was Seals with Clubs but if you are going totap the $3 trillion a year gaming market you are going to need a bit more than Java script skills. Not a prayer Just a thought.