NDNHC must have a lot of spammers in his campaign if tspacepilot is winning any kind of bonus/award.

I still don't see why such a spammer/scammer is allowed to receive payment for advertising. I guess scam sites are sympathetic to other scammers.

Or maybe tspacepilot is one of the owners of DaDice or is one of the people behind this scam site........

Can I get the same traetment for the same reason please?

I agree that this person is a major spammer. He is probably puzzel.me based on the trust he sends and receives.

Why did you name this thread "Mods Please Read"? Don't you know that mods cannot ban people. Only admins/administrators can ban people, so can Global Moderators. You aren't tring to increase your post count are you?

A better title might be "Admins and Global Mods Please Read"... please fix this

it has been sold. Thank you for your interest though

That person has made an offer to buy my DefaultTrust account for $900US worth of BTC. I had already sold it by the time he made an offer so I was not able to allow him to buy it.

Even though the price I sold it for was significiently less then what he offer was, I am glad my account didn't end up in the hands of a scammer

GPG encryption will be used so even the admins cannot read PM's between myself and the buyer/escrow.

Passwords change between accounts all the time, a lot of accounts would be removed if every account whose password was changed ended up getting removed from DefaultTrust list

You are more then free to belive what you wish. Your current posting is only accompishing my goal of not having my primary account trolled in ways you like to troll others.

My primary points in this thread is that you like to derail threads, which is something you just admitted to doing in your most recent response. The reason why your post was deleted was because you were derailing a thread, which is what you do very often.

If you wish to bring up my post in the PD3 thread, then I was warning the owners of PD3 of your shady behavior. I apoligize for stopping your ability to further steal from PD3 with your faucet bots, yet the right thing to do is to prevent thefts that you like to partake in from occuring.

It is no wonder why you wish to make it so easy for scams to be pulled off

tspacepilot likes to derail threads with claims of everyone that disagrees with him is an alt of either Tradefortress or Quickseller. tspacepilot does not like to address actual claims aginst him because he knows he can make enough noise to distract against the conversation.

I am posting from an account that is not my main one to avoid getting trolled in similar ways that Tradefortress and Quickseller received trolled from tspacepilot after calling him out on his scams.

It is a shame that tspacepilot has not received a ban for derailing numberious threads even before he was called out as a scammer. If requested, I can find over a dozen posts when tspacepilot is making extremly low value posts yet remains unbanned.

I find it discusing that non-english speaking spammers get banned day in and day out for useless posts that hae greater value then tspacepilot's posts, yet tspacepilot never gets banned while clearly speaking enlish as his primary language.

You were able to troll Quickseller off of DefaulTrust list. Tradefortress may have hacked a DefaultTrust account but he would not be able to provide a signed message like I would be able to do.

If you want to see how much people are afriad to speak out against you in fear of getting trolled (how I am not posting from my main account) then look at this list and look at how many people have your trust ratings excluded from their trust lists. These people represent those who disagree with you yet are not willing to speak out to avoid the conistant trolling.

You are a troll and a spammer

Please take note that tspacepilot did not explicatly deny trying to scam PD3 of it's faucet funds by using bots to manulipate the faucet and steal from PD3. Instead tspacepilot tried to distract from the conversation and claim that I am someone who tspacepilot likes to troll.

If I were Stunna, I would work with Theymos to try to find either an IP or bitcoin address connection between tspacepilot and the people who are ruining the PD3 faucet for everyone. Remember that tspacepilot has a hisotry of using bots to exploit weaknesses in sites giving away money.

This is a good idea. tspacepilot has a history of using bots to gain small payouts that he is not entitled to. These small payouts will add up to a lot of money over time. I would be willing to put up a wadger to say that tspacepilot is behind some of the faucet farming that occurs in PD3 and other faucet-enabled gambling sites.

It is people like tspacepilot that ruin the fauct at PD3 for everyone.

Bumping this thread. The account in question is still on the DefaultTrust list

I am not concerned about the number of people on the DefaultTrust list. I am concerned about the lack of people on DefaultTrust list being unwilling to leave negative trust when it should be left.

It is not realistic for moderators to moderate scams because it is impossible to tell when something is a scam or not with 100% certainty, and attempting to do so would cause many people being prevented from trading who are simply uneducated as to how to trade on here, and if my research of you is correct, this would apply to you prior to you accepting escrow services. This would be the bad of all worlds because scammers would learn how to avoid detection of moderators and slightly change their practices, and legitimate users would simply abondon bitcoin when they make small mistakes in how they try to trade with others.

---

---

---

I may propose some kind of system where members of the DefaultTrust list can vote, anon, if someone deserves an anon negative rating, and if so then the person should be awareded an anon negative rating that can only be removed with the vote of even more members of the DefaultTrust list. Maybe someone can receive such a "super rating" if three people vote for such a rating, and such a rating can only be removed if 130% of the number of people who voted for such a rating voted to have it removed.

Look at this thread that is stickied in meta. It should be pretty clear that posting off topic replies is not allowed. It does not matter that others are doing the same thing, not even in the same thread.

It should be pretty clear that the fact that you created this thread is evidence that you think you are above the rules. The fact that you openly stole money from tradefortress and then said that the negative trust feedback you received as a result was inappropiate.
I am talking about this. You admitted to using a bot to gain payments, it is clear that it was against the TOS of coinchat to receive such payments. You claimed that negative trust was inappropiate because you had no trade with Tradefortress in the currency exchange section.

When I saw this issue brought back up by both you and Quickseller, I lost a lot of respect for Tomatocage for not also tagging you with negative trust, the same can be said about Vod when he returned from his break. I lost respect for BadBear for not outting your alts. Most importantly, I lost respect for Quickseller for replacing the negative rating with a neutral with some BS excuise for changing it (I almost think someone blackmailed him into doing so).
I do not have you confused with someone else. Look at my above-refrenced thread. You clearly stole coins from CoinChat.
How many threads have you attempted to derail? It is too many to count. I will comple a list if you wish to deny the fact that you are a spammer and the fact that you attempt to derail threads.

---

---

---

This thread has gotten horribly off topic. This is suppose to be about how much of a spammer tspacepilot is, not about dogie. Please refrain from posting off topic replies, and post such posts in the appropiate thread.

tspacepilot seems to think he is above the rules. His own post admits that he is derailing the thread, yet he questions as to why the post was deleted.

Maybe tspacepilot thinks it is okay to steal money from people and then troll anyone who claims he did anything wrong. If this is the case then he is truely a psychopath.

It is no wonder why psychopath tspacepilot does not have any negative trust even though it is clear that he stole bitcoin from others.

Dank was banned for derailing threads, yet tspacepilot is not banned. I wonder how many more threads tspacepilot will need to derail with useless posts until he receives a ban.

Three people have bothered, Quickseller, Vod and Tomatocage. One of them no longer has the influence to have his ratings displayed by default, one has left the community (close to perminently), and one has become much too conservative in handing out negative ratings (in order).

I don't think it is entirely a thankless job, I have seen many people say they appreciate the work that all three of them do individually. I have also seen many people post that each of them should be consulted to check if something is a scam or not, so there is reason to believe they do earn a level of respect for tagging scammers.

I think you are right that scammers (and spammers) are going to put a lot of effort into smearing the likes of the above examples I provided. Just look at the "I hate Quickseller", and "I hate Vod" threads, they quickly agree with eachother, potentially agreeing with themselves via sockpuppet accounts - but then again, I am pretty sure you for some reason have a lot of experience with that - at least a lot of experience of being on the receiving end of that.

I like the fact that you are anon by critizing a mod, while you concurrently criticize the forum for allowing mods to be anon when they take action against you.

I think it should be fairly obvious who you are anyway

I will delete my post in the thread this was originally posted in and repost here since my original post was techincally off topic. My post was originally in this thread, and is quoted below:

---

---

---

I think that our community does not have enough people on DefaultTrust that are active in marking scammers. I can say that very few (if any) scammers were marked with the account that I wanted to sell when I created this account, primarily to keep away the trolling that is associated with such marking.

I think that many people on DefaultTrust wish to maintain a very positive image of themselves to others so they do not tag scammers when they find them. Some people are so afraid of getting trolled that they quickly remove any negative ratings they leave scammers when their inbox gets spammed with enough PM's. Even Tomatocage was spammed with 10+ PM's in his inbox about the above scammer and downgraded his negative rating to a neutral despite solid evidence, a few people even said that the evidence was solid who are on DefaultTrust.

Fair enough. The free market is pretty efficient.
I agree with your statement of facts, and yes I use tor.

I thought that the 360 second rule was suppose to also be something that fights spammers, which is my point entirely. I paid a fee that was designed to be anti-spam, so why should I have to endure something else that also fights spam?
BadBear has said in the past that he will whitelist anyone that he deems to be reputable, and even those that are not as long as they do not start posting garbage right away. I could easily ask to have this account whitelisted, however doing so would potentially risk my identity being discovered, which in turn could potentially risk the identity of my DefaultTrust account be discovered, which could result in my DefaultTrust account be removed from someone's trust list and/or excluded from someone else's trust list.

I know that I am certainly not posting garbage, and would consider my main account to be fairly (if not extremly) reputable.

I would not have an issue if the fee was somewhat higher and would then include the whitelisting privilidge

Try to ingore the fact that I am trying to sell something that you probably don't want me selling. Also please try to ignore my asking price, I will most likely receive significiently less then my asking price.

My point is that me paying the .003 BTC is an anti-spam measure. The 360 jail is also an anti-spam measure. Why should I have to be subject to 2 anti-spam measures (both the tax and the 360 second jail) when others are only subject to one anti-spam measures.

I am paying to keep my identity anon, so I don't see why I should also have to wait a long time between my posts. If I end up breaking the forum rules then I will end up banned and the .003 BTC that I spent will go to waist (plus the various tx fees that I paid and the fees associated with mixing the coins)

I paid ~.003 BTC which is no small amount if you ask people in third world countries.

I highly doubt that my main account is on anyone's ignore list, at least not anyone reputable.

If I were to get whitelisted and then start spamming then I would loose out on the .003 BTC which would be lame