 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
rDmf69BM1PEBHU5XQt23zFVWBpad3Dd6EU
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Raphael, the swap is still minus now:
Unrealized Swap -$0.71
|
|
|
|
|
Something is wrong:
About 40 min ago:
Unrealized Swap $0.73
Now:
Unrealized Swap -$0.40
My short position is not changed in this period.
|
|
|
|
|
Once an order is partially filled, it cannot be canceled as the "Cancel" link is disappeared. It seems a bug too.
|
|
|
|
|
Congratulations! It works fine!
Bug: the old issue comes back, I have to use small buy orders to liquidate the short position.
|
|
|
|
|
Bug report:
When I place an buy order to liquidate my short position, the following message is shown: "Invalid order: not enough balance".
|
|
|
|
Just got 50% of mine back today - half of my BTC and half of my USD - both as gox codes
has anyone else go any usd payments back yet? please reply here and let us know. I got some USD and BTC back today, both as MTGOX Codes. It's a little less than 50%, and I've replied to ask the reason. |
|
|
|
|
Currently I cannot place any order.
I can log in, I can see my total BTC amount and USD amount, but after I input the order and press the "BUY BITCOINS" button or "SELL BITCOINS" button, no change in the open order list.
|
|
|
|
I, for one, am happy that positions will be liquidated around $5. That was the price when this shit happened, so it's reasonable. Plus, I have a short there  Obviously you took a bad position so fuck you hahaha, just kidding Long should be liquidate NOW at market price and shorts at a convenient time ($ 5) Zhoutong's opinion was "all short positions can liquidate at 4.94". https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=81045.msg897877#msg897877 |
|
|
|
Anyway I'm going to avoid posting now, since the technical problems have been resolved, and the remaining things are legal. I've probably made a bunch of mistakes or inaccuracies above as I don't have a complete understanding of this and don't have a legal background.
Does it means the way of open position liquidation was finalized already? What is it? |
|
|
|
That's not an option for me. I live in Poland and realizing cheques would be MUCH pain to me. I once tried to do this with Google Adsense cheque, before they started to sending international wires. It took TWO freakin' months to complete. Not everyone's live in the US you know. MtGox reedem codes for USDs and Bitcoin transfers for BTCs please.
+1 a rapid method for those who have the email-notification (number of the transaction, the date, time, how much), slow - for those who have not. Please MtGox-code (became the de facto standard for USD) and transaction Bitcoin for Bitcoin. +1 MtGox-code for BTC is fine too. |
|
|
|
I will post information here as I receive it.
28 May 07:00: Discussion right now is centered on the nature of selecting payess. There is the question of what nature the system for choosing payees should take with different people favouring 1 of 2 approaches (one is fast and unreliable, the other slow and reliable). I can't say more than that for technical reasons. Everyone wants to pay everyone back, but have a differing opinion how it will work.
How unreliable and how slow are these 2 approaches? Please give us a estimation. I'd hope the slow approach won't take too loooooooooong time. |
|
|
|
--- Disclaimer: Pure suggestion. NOT OFFICIAL ---
- Your bitcointalk.org profile or Bitcoin-OTC rating shows you as reputable and trustworthy. (50 Points)
- You can supply at least one transactional email you have received which perfectly matches our outgoing transactional email records. (30 Points)
- You can provide passport scans and you have provided to Bitcoinica (even if it's pending verification). (40 Points)
- The order of magnitude of your reported balance is consistent with our outdated accounting records. (30 Points)
- You can recall the balances exactly or very precisely. (20 Points)
- You have reported a losing position, with precise details. (20 Points)
- You have contacted Bitcoinica Support at least once since September 2011. (10 Points)
- Your email can be searched online and matches your identity. (10 Points)
- You can provide proof of Bitcoin address ownership (signature), Mt. Gox code you have used/obtained or accurate details of large transaction records (>2500 BTC) that match our hedging activity. (10 Points each kind of evidence)
- Another reputable member supports your claim. (10 Points)
- You have used wire transfer, BitInstant or AurumXchange to deposit/withdraw funds and they can verify the records. (10 Points)
- You have submitted the claim within the first 24 hours since the announcement. (10 Points)
If there are no transactional emails or support emails ever sent to the claimed address, 0 Points for now.
--- Disclaimer: Pure suggestion. NOT OFFICIAL ---
I have been a Bitcoinica customer for the last several months. I made a number of deposits to Bitcoinica from Mt.Gox, using Mt.Gox codes. I executed dozens of trades, won some, lost some, made no withdrawals. I never had any issues with the service so I made no complaints and sent no emails to support. I don't seem to have received _any_ emails from *@bitcoinica.com prior to the claims form.I had a smooth, clean, entirely trouble free relationship with bitcoinica to the day of the last hack. From reading zhoutongs inane unofficial suggestion I get a sinking feeling in my stomach. Was transactional emails turned off by default? (I don't like frequent, automated emails cluttering my inbox.) Am I looking at the wrong email address? Or am I missing something? *slams head into keyboard* you got an email when you deposited money (any currency). i am in a similar situation: i just deleted them immediatly. but at least i did had a verified account and made a wire transfer (dont know if i am respected member...). Strange. I got emails when I withdrawal, but no email when I deposit. |
|
|
|
|
Bitcoinica Consultancy, please check if it is a bug: Why the Deposit Method of "Last Deposit" cannot be "BITCOINICA-CODE"?
Now on the claims page, the "BITCOINICA-CODE" is available for "Last Withdrawal", but not available for "Last Deposit".
|
|
|
|
Suggestion: If you refer to an older chart, could you include in which update it was? Or perhaps just attach the chart again with the same number. I find myself endlessly searching my mailbox.  +1 Maybe it's good to put the chart numbers in the email subject, like this: Feb 29 update (chart 61-62, 42-43)Everytime a email is sent, put the email subject in this thread. It helps to attract the new customers, they will guess the rich content as the subject suggested. |
|
|
|
|
