 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
You already created a topic about the by-laws, why not continue discussion there?
Because that thread is buried deep in the hierarchy and difficult for people to find. Clearly I'm up against some very strong forces of the Bitcoin power elite here, I've touched a nerve as I may have exposed some significant deception. |
|
|
|
Wow, Satoshi is Milton Friedman.  |
|
|
|
What makes you think Satoshi isn't entirely capable of defending his own honor, if he's upset about this?
It's possible that THE BITCOIN FOUNDATION, INC. just entered his name and details into the by-laws and makes it appear that Satoshi endorses THE BITCOIN FOUNDATION, INC. Additionally, they admit they have locked Satoshi out of the forum. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=186939.msg1943004#msg1943004His account is locked, so no. If he wants to claim his account, he'll have to contact me with a PGP signature.
|
|
|
|
http://www.theverge.com/2012/10/1/3436984/bitcoin-foundation-legitimacy-and-standardizationIn a response, Vessenes said he could "confirm that Satoshi is a Founding Member" of the Foundation, though he didn’t disclose who he was. He also sees the move away from anonymity as vital to building trust in Bitcoin. "I hope we’ll be able to provide a bit of social proof that people are high-quality and willing to tell their real names," he says of the rule. Obviously, this doesn’t stop anyone from using their coins anonymously, but if the group gains clout, it could incentivize putting your name behind your trades.
Where is the proof of confirmation? We don't need six confirmations, one is sufficient in this case.
|
|
|
|
Yeah. Like a thread about Hostess Cupcakes is "a completely different hypothetical concept" than a thread about Hostess Twinkies.
Hal Finney and Mike Hearn are here and can communicate for themselves. Satoshi is not. |
|
|
|
|
Yes, but it would have been far more difficult for Hal Finney and Mike Hearn to find this thread. Don't kill the messenger and please let this thread exist for a few days before you move it.
|
|
|
|
|
This thread is a completely different hypothetical concept than my other threads. Though you are free to comment and express your ideas, we aren't asking you the question. The question is for Hal Finney and Mike Hearn.
|
|
|
|
Both Hal Finney and Mike Hearn have made significant contributions to Bitcoin. Hal Finney developed Hashcash which Bitcoin builds upon. See http://www.hashcash.org/ Mike Hearn is the lead the developer of Bitcoinj, a Java implementation of a Bitcoin client-only node. See https://code.google.com/p/bitcoinj/The question is: How would you feel if THE BITCOIN FOUNDATION, INC. named you as a founding member in their by-laws without your consent? |
|
|
|
Now imagine if they add me as a founder member. Without my consent. This clearly would not be acceptable because i am not a founder and i never signed to be one.
This is correct. We need the community to demand a scan of the original by-laws as soon as possible. Otherwise, the takeover of Bitcoin by THE BITCOIN FOUNDATION, INC. is essentially complete. We don't want to see Satoshi's Bitcoin born January 3, 2009 and died April 26, 2013. |
|
|
|
|
Donald Duck is clearly not a real person. A real person should be consented and Satoshi is presented as a real person as a founding member. You are skirting the real issue and we simply wanted to see a scan of the by-laws and who signed them.
|
|
|
|
There we go, the insiders are moving in to take over Bitcoin in a United States corporation. If this is not a warning, what is?США взяла под контроль Bitcoin и выставил его на риски системы США законной. Товарищи, мы должны собраться вместе, чтобы взять под контроль код. Satoshi призывает к нашей помощи. Los Estados Unidos han tomado el control de Bitcoin y ha expuesto a los riesgos del sistema legal de los Estados Unidos. Camaradas, hay que reunirse para tomar el control de la base de código. Satoshi está pidiendo nuestra ayuda. واتخذت الولايات المتحدة السيطرة على Bitcoin ويتعرض لمخاطر النظام القانوني للولايات المتحدة. الرفاق، يجب علينا
جمع معا للسيطرة على مصدر برنامج. ساتوشي تدعو إلى مساعدتنا.
米国は、Bitcoinのを制御していると米国の法的システムのリスクにさらされています。仲間は、私たちは、コードベースの制御を取るために一緒に収集する必要があります。サトシたちは助けを求めている。 美国已采取的控制Bitcoin的和已经暴露了美国法律制度的风险。同志们，我们必须聚集在一起，采取控制的codebase。聪呼吁我们的帮助。 Les Etats-Unis ont pris le contrôle de Bitcoin et l'a exposée aux risques du système juridique des États-Unis. Camarades, nous devons nous rassembler pour prendre le contrôle du code source. Satoshi lance un appel à notre aide. De Verenigde Staten heeft de controle over Bitcoin genomen en heeft zij blootgesteld aan de risico's van de Verenigde Staten rechtssysteem. Kameraden, we moeten samenkomen om de controle van de codebase te nemen. Satoshi vraagt om onze hulp. Usono faris kun Bitcoin kaj elmontris gxin al la riskoj de Usono leĝa sistemo. Kamaradoj, ni devas kunvenigu al fari kun la codebase. Satoshi vokas nian helpon. |
|
|
|
|
We don't need to do a pull request. We simply want to see a scan of the original by-laws to see who signed. There is no PDF scan in the Github.
|
|
|
|
The Wikimedia Foundation bylaws are signed: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/BylawsSIGNATURES /s/ Kat Walsh, /s/ Jan-Bart de Vreede, /s/ Jimmy Wales, /s/ Bishakha Datta, /s/ Matt Halprin, /s/ Stu West. /s/ Samuel Klein, /s/ Alice Wiegand, /s/ Patricio Lorente, /s/ Ting Chen |
|
|
|
It's clear all that's listed is his assumed identification. The free market can take that whichever way they want. You don't seem to give the free market much credit.
The question is not about the free market. You are now using the "hide the problem in plain site technique". The by-laws clearly state he is a founder and we want to see his signature. The ethics of this situation absolutely require it. |
|
|
|
Once Bitcoin reached a certain point of adoption Satoshi said he was "moving on to other things". For whatever reason(s) he is no longer dealing in any significant way with Bitcoin, at least not openly. If he should ever decide to return in a public way why should he not have status with an organization likely to be well associated with the project he started?
We want to know if he consented to being a founding member of THE BITCOIN FOUNDATION, INC. or if THE BITCOIN FOUNDATION, INC. is simply using his name to strengthen their hold as the self appointed "leaders" of Bitcoin. The ethical question this poses is extremely important. |
|
|
|
What makes you think it was without his consent?
The scan of the original by-laws will answer that question. |
|
|
|
What do you think is news? The people who set up the foundation are honoring the person, group, or entity responsible for the project they support. Your breaking news has been widely known for several months.
They are not honoring Him, they have named him as a founding member: (a) Founding Members. The Founding Members of the Corporation shall be: In the interest of full transparency THE BITCOIN FOUNDATION, INC. should post a scan of the original by-laws or provide us with an explanation why he was appointed without his consent. |
|
|
|
Satoshi has been sighted! He is now a member of "the Foundation" otherwise known as THE BITCOIN FOUNDATION, INC.ARTICLE III - MEMBERSHIP Section 3.1 Membership Classes: The Corporation will have three classes of membership: (a) Founding Members; (b) Industry Members; and (c) Individual Members. The term "member" may be used to refer generically to a member in any class. Section 3.2 Membership Qualifications: The requirements for membership in each membership class shall be as follows: (a) Founding Members. The Founding Members of the Corporation shall be: i. Gavin Andresen, Bitcoin Developer residing or doing business in Amherst, MA, USA. ii. Peter Vessenes, CEO of CoinLab and residing or doing business in Bainbridge Island, WA, USA. iii. Charles Shrem, CEO of BitInstant residing or doing business in Brooklyn, NY, USA. iv. Roger Ver, CEO of MemoryDealers residing or doing business in Santa Clara, CA, USA. v. Patrick Murck, Principal at Engage Legal, PLLC residing or doing business in Washington, DC, USA. vi. Mark Karpeles, CEO of MtGox.com and residing or doing business in Tokyo, Japan. vii. Satoshi Nakamoto, at satoshin@gmx.com, author of the white paper “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System” published on http://bitcoin.org and owner of the PGP Public Key with fingerprint: 5EC948A1.Please post on Twitter, Facebook and other social media. Let's get the word out. THE BITCOIN FOUNDATION, INC. is scrambling and covering up to bury this story by relegating the most important revelation since the genesis block as deeply as they could in these forums:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=188177.0
|
|
|
|
|
There we go, stifled and buried deep in the forums. The most important revelation since the genesis of Bitcoin. You should be ashamed of yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
*** Can you please post a scan of the original by-laws for THE BITCOIN FOUNDATION, INC. we wish to see Satoshi's signature as a founding member. ***
Confirmed: One of my posts has been deleted. We have awoken the monster. We must continue on while we have momentum and they are scrambling and covering up. We are working within the belly of the beast here.
|
|
|
|
|
