Trying to choose which delegates I should vote for is proving to be a daunting and messy process.
I've found myself sifting through an overwhelming amount of info from this forum (bitcointalk.org) and others such as lisk.chat, lisk.io, forum.lisk.io, github.com, reddit.com (r/lisk, r/liskmarkets, r/liskdelegates), explorer.lisk.io, login.lisk.io, faucet.lisk.io, blog.lisk.io and academy.lisk.io. This is all disorganized and a pain in the rump. There is no effective way go about this. I'm disappointing with Lisk's efforts on this. Unfortunately, the delegate proposals are presented in varying styles and formats making apples-to-apples comparisons impossible. Many are outdated or incomplete so I have to click through multiple pages of each proposal in search of the full story. There are way too many inter-delegate posts stating "I'll vote for you if you vote for me". There looks to be 800+ delegate hopefuls. And holy cow, selecting the delegates via the https://login.lisk.io/delegates takes forever! Why is there no search function?
After all that reading I'm not even sure what voting strategy I should employ. Each delegate hopeful offers their own unique strategy of how they will run their operation. It's hard to know what is best because "best" is a user specific definition depending on personal preferences.
I have over 50k LSK. I want to to put it to good use. Should I vote for the delegates who say they are best for the Lisk ecosystem or for those who share their forging rewards? Dunno, it's hard to say.
Is anyone else finding this voting experience to be an unpleasant one?