I've just finished my article about Proof of Work alternatives and I'd like to share it with you and have a discussion.
The article comes in two parts and describes alternatives for PoW algo.
I've tried to analyze the following algos:
- Proof of Stake
- Proof of Activity
- Proof of Burn
- Proof of Capacity
Part 1: https://bytecoin.org/blog/proof-of-stake-proof-of-work-comparison/
Part 2: https://bytecoin.org/blog/proof-of-activity-proof-of-burn-proof-of-capacity/
A small quote from the first part
Quote
Proof of Work criticism
As we remember, the Proof of Work was born in the long past 1993, in the cryptographers' family; parents intended it to become the defender from DoS attacks and spam. However, it received an offer it could not refuse by some anonymous with Japanese accent: to become a basis for distributed timestamp server. The scheme seemed simple: network nodes "vote" for their version of transaction history by introducing their computational powers into calculating "rare" hashes. The version that gets the majority of votes is accepted by all nodes as the reference version.
As we remember, the Proof of Work was born in the long past 1993, in the cryptographers' family; parents intended it to become the defender from DoS attacks and spam. However, it received an offer it could not refuse by some anonymous with Japanese accent: to become a basis for distributed timestamp server. The scheme seemed simple: network nodes "vote" for their version of transaction history by introducing their computational powers into calculating "rare" hashes. The version that gets the majority of votes is accepted by all nodes as the reference version.
Would be happy to hear your comments!