Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 07:07:08 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
1  Local / Petites annonces / Vends des bitcoins à Toulouse on: February 20, 2016, 06:42:44 PM
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Bonjour,

Je vends des bitcoins à Toulouse, pour un paiement en espèces.

Quantité disponible : 446.60 mBTC - 170 EUR

À bientôt.
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
Version: MultiBit HD (0.2.0)
Comment: https://multibit.org
Address: 17opQsbw8873x4PTwzvacEjNR2a59mSxoT

H04p13uNoe6N8Ti4+b+bruth2qOdxvKC4RQr/LhzOCAdTWjx4AJ/p1MqbQPxL7GqLq72dcYDOePk/Tfu1CUKT1o=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
2  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Gox collapse due (in part) to neglect of Bitcoin Foundation Board? on: March 04, 2014, 06:03:37 AM
I also can not understand this silence. Half a billion dollars are missing, and they all act like nobody knows anything.

Half a billion… and nobody can answer what happened. Something is wrong.
3  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Blockchain.info failure with over 40BTC on: March 04, 2014, 12:30:11 AM
I have an explanation: quantum mechanics.

As for the two-factor authentification that lets you stay anonymous, RFC 6238 / Google Authenticator is what you're looking for.
4  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: "mt-gox-source-code-leaked", unsure about source. on: March 03, 2014, 10:40:22 PM
Link to the source code: http://pastebin.com/W8B3CGiN

We should talk about this more.

If somebody had total access to their servers, maybe the fact that they were hacked is actually plausible. Hackers could have hidden everything they did.

They probably didn't use a cold storage like they claimed. I cannot withdraw half a million of BTC from a cold storage and remain unnoticed…
5  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Blockchain.info failure with over 40BTC on: February 27, 2014, 07:43:48 PM
The good news is that the transaction that tried to move the coins out of address A to address C will never confirm, eventually it will get dropped and your coins will go back to address A.

Just mellow out and wait.
Why do you think it will never confirm? It just depends on previous low-priority transactions that are still awaiting confirmation.

EDIT: the transaction I posted above just got included in a block. So you should get your money pretty soon.

EDIT2: your transactions are confirmed now. So everything is ok?
6  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Blockchain.info failure with over 40BTC on: February 27, 2014, 07:42:09 PM
This is "Address C:" https://blockchain.info/address/1L9iqHuAxe6mGYYP5ksM46cs4vt9Lr6as1

I never sent that amount. I've never seen the "from" addresses. It is the balance of what WAS on Address A.

This is "Address A:" https://blockchain.info/address/1Hmpf43EcRMSMd6MMxGLtojFWCYCjXEHQU

I have no idea why this transaction is for so many BTC. It was a much, much smaller number that I told it to send, and I told it to send to Address B. Address C didn't even exist at the time, and was magically created at this very moment.

This is "Address B:" https://blockchain.info/address/1DaoC2iHsEuQV3LSEwgyzvpbSUA1wqH5Ce
Okay, first of all, the transaction is still unconfirmed, so it's normal that you don't have access to your money yet. The reason is that some of the previous related transaction weren't confirmed because of their low priority, like this one:

https://blockchain.info/fr/tx/a2c9b4d169150c565ba67865caf4ef998f2276eb588c5e9001b4180456613264

(it was made 8 hours ago and will be confirmed in 6 blocks because it's medium priority)

I would advise to still wait a couple of hours, and if you have the private key of the address C, you're good.

P.S. You should take seriously the advice about using a 2-factor authentification for your own security, even if your account was probably not hacked.
7  Economy / Exchanges / Re: How to pronounce "MtGox"? on: February 27, 2014, 07:15:22 PM
empty ghost
8  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Blockchain.info failure with over 40BTC on: February 27, 2014, 06:25:27 PM
You have to understand that we can't guess what's going on if we don't even have a tx id or btc address to work with…

It shouldn't be a security issue to reveal them (all transactions are public anyway), unless you think it can hurt your privacy.
9  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: mtgox chat from today ! we still alive !!!! he is not finished at all ! on: February 26, 2014, 04:28:06 AM
It's true that bitcoin is the currency of the Internet, because MtGox CEO releases pictures of cats instead of press releases.
love that quote  Cheesy
10  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Helping Gox on: February 26, 2014, 04:23:04 AM
what if mtgox identifies the invalid transfers and all of the miners decide to rewrite the blockchain invalidating those transactions, so that mtgox gets their money back?
11  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Gox Gone, Insolvent on: February 25, 2014, 04:03:59 PM
Like if I needed protection Shocked

Thanks Gox, very helpful.
12  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Gox Report stating it is 50% solvent? Thoughts? on: February 25, 2014, 04:02:52 PM
They underestimate their liability anyway…

744,408 BTC (MtGox av price 160 USD= 119,105,280 USD)

The real price is 500 USD if not more.
13  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Maybe mtgox is just going to close and open under another name? on: February 25, 2014, 03:59:11 PM
In the light of recent news, I guess I was maybe right. Grin
14  Economy / Service Discussion / Maybe mtgox is just going to close and open under another name? on: February 24, 2014, 12:55:27 PM
MtGox deleted theirs tweets, maybe that's just because they release that their brand is fucked up.

So they decided to start everything from scratch under another brand, this would explain why it takes them such a long time.
15  Economy / Service Discussion / [mtgox] Is Mark still alive? on: February 24, 2014, 02:16:53 AM
Ok my thoughts are probably extremely weird and unsound.

But there are rumors about death threats, there are announcements of security concerns and the relocation of MtGOX, and all of that "slowing down" the process of reopening withdrawals.

There is a guy named leickr here who seems to have predicted that prices were going to crash before mtgox officially announced that withdrawals were closed: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=476381.msg5253579#msg5253579

The last sing he told us is "Finally, the Gox's CEO was killed by someone's gun", you can read it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=476482.msg5255010#msg5255010

So, since we didn't hear any news from Mark and nobody know what he's doing and where he is, is it possible that Mark has simply been killed? This would explain many things.
16  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin 2.0 altcoin name? on: January 07, 2014, 05:55:09 PM
One question. 0% fee forever = potential spam?
17  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] DOGE POOL! FAST-POOL.COM - 0% FEE much DOGECOIN on: December 21, 2013, 05:36:13 PM
OK It's back to 10k+.

Maybe the service was interrupted? I will look into logs. Please run the service smoothly.
18  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] DOGE POOL! FAST-POOL.COM - 0% FEE much DOGECOIN on: December 21, 2013, 05:00:38 PM
Could be great to see workers' statuses.

Also, my unconfirmed revenue (= 2 hours average) went down from 12 k to 8 k today.

The share/s rate didn't move (0.56 /s). Any idea why? Network hashrate decreased and is under 30 k GH/s now… so I should gain more Huh
19  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: List of all cryptocoins on: December 21, 2013, 04:42:33 PM
YOU MUST ADD DOGE!!!

MAJOR CRYPTOCURRENCY
20  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] DOGE POOL! FAST-POOL.COM - 0% FEE much DOGECOIN on: December 21, 2013, 02:53:56 PM
Hi,

Eventually ended up using this pool. Not perfect (some stats not available), but seems to be quite good, supporting my 200+ workers Smiley

I am donating 1%, because I believe we should give at least some money to the pool to sustain it.

I prefer to have a fee of 0.5% - 1% (but not more, or it will seem overpriced) in exchange of a service that works flawlessly, financing all the necessary hardware and hosting.

I wonder what other miners think of it, and if they really care to lose 1% in exchange of a better quality?
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!