f some one is dominating over the distributed system, isn't it something l can put that he/orshe owns the market and can shut it down without any other effort then money? And if the system is technically cannot be shut down by the government it can be shut down by a couple of rich individuals and then it makes no sense to participate the system where major share of the currency is frozen and even though people are willing to sell something in most cases nobody can buy it because there is no money available?
Is not it considered unsafe for the market?"
What he said
Show Posts
