I hope potential future investors see the level of transparency you are providing to your current investors who you have outstanding obligations to. Your advertised "500 bitcoin net profit" is in reality a hypothetical revenue potential and refuse to even give the simple question: what is Money Pots actual net profit?.

In your update you reset the investor profit conveniently hiding the huge amount of money investors lost. And of course you have no problems advertising how much wagers and users you have.

But worst of all you refuse repeated calls to demonstrate solvency like in the exact same manner you previously did. People would even be happy with you proving your assets to a neutral 3rd party like Dooglus who could also substantiate your claim you never claimed the BCC which it justification for withholding it from investors.

But I particularly love your will receive donations from revenue generated legal hack. I'm assuming you came up with it yourself. I showed my wife who works in a legal firm and she spat out her coffee laughing. She pointed out that not only is it's transparently obvious what it it really is, it demonstrates willful non-compliance.

Perhaps you should allocate some of that money for upcoming legal expenses.

This will be my last post on the matter. I have already written off my loses investmenting into Money Pot and fulfilled my duty in warning future investors and the securities commission.

Keeth, your behavior here is disgusting and I believe a crime under Canadian security laws. I have made a formal complaint to the Ontario Security Commission.

I am one of your previous investors, and besides losing considerable money to what was either theft or at best criminal negligence. Furthermore last year you promised me compensation, a promise you have done absolutely nothing towards. Not a single satoshi. Raising money from new investors to pay back old ones is almost the definition of a ponzi.

If you lost money then your financial statements must reflect the fact. As you know, what you "should have" made is known as "expected value". What you actually made is known as revenue.

And revenue is very different from "net-profit". I would hope you already know what net-profit is, but let me help make sure we are on the same page: net-profit is how much money you've made after all expenses are consider.

I am sure you and your team have not been working the last 2 years for free with no expenses. So I'll ask you plainly, please answer: Over the last 2 years, what is Money Pot's actual net profit?



but as you did in well in your last post you avoided the central question about solvency. I will repeat MartinL's statement as it reflects my own position rather well:

As a former MoneyPot investor myself, I'd love for you to prove me wrong by demonstrating your solvency–like MoneyPot regularly used to before you stopped doing it.

Hi Dean, I'm a long term player. See my post history as I have supported you in the past. But I seem to be stuck with these people with my withdrawal set as processed but never sent.

My account:

username: fate
deposit:3BfBP8fcSRwApypeuspW2CbShEBbeqjp2E
withdrawal: 2017-09-06 17:04 16unNHDRgp87nbx3ZsnJzkCqEe2r9aBd4z


But it says processed but no money has been sent:

https://blockchain.info/address/16unNHDRgp87nbx3ZsnJzkCqEe2r9aBd4z


I did play for bonuses like dooglus, is that why?

I am a quite interested in this as it certainly seems like a much better site than the bit777 I was originally looking at, and at a lower price.

However the clouds over dadice's legitimacy give me pause. I'm trying to look for a reasonable explanation for why dadice would be willing to destroy its credibility both to serious players and a potential buyer if it truly did have the bankroll/solvency, but such an explanation eludes me. I don't think this is a fatal flaw, as with a new solvent management (who can prove solvency) this can be resolved), but it would be nice to hear the fully story, even if it was as simple as "We thought it was a white-lie to say we had 500 BTC bankroll, but then backed ourselves into a corner when people started demanding we prove it. However, we never missed a payment"


Regardless, what I'm most interested in is some actual data on the expenses to date, especially on knowing the ballpark of faucet costs. But the total spent away in jackpots, advertising and other operating costs would go a long way to establishing the sites value.

To date the site has made 0.54714 BTC in comissions

He doesn't want you to fill his database with your dust. If he was scared, he'd LOWER the max wager/win, not increase the stakes. Just bet x100 as much, and you'll win (or lose) x100 as much.

Well instead of making incoherent rants, why don't you go out there and make some money? If it was possible to beat the house edge, I can pretty much guarantee that you wouldn't be the only person in the world to have figured it out. Anyway, please start gambling as I look forward to your next thread when you lose it all.

if you went out of your way to ignore the other commonly accepted meanings of rape, perhaps