Read the OP, bids must be divisble by 0.05 BTC. |
|
|
|
This guy(?) apparently spent $1,000 and was pushing "ASX ASICs" company just a week or two ago.You have now been banned from /r/bitcoinMining for not following the rules (no group buy organization allowed via the subreddit) and being a fairly obvious scammer. I wouldn't suggest that anybody participate in this group buy. There are plenty of more legitimate names/faces out there to trust your money with. EDIT: And LOL at "been active on reddit for over a year, see my links..." section of your post above. You made all of ~10 posts within the first 12 months of your account, and the remainder have been posted in the last few weeks. To be honest it looks like a stolen/hacked reddit account. You have mentioned "bitcoin" 82 times in the last 22 days on reddit, and never once before that. |
|
|
|
|
Is this auction legit?
You have posters with less than 25 posts bidding for google.com and sealswithclubs with over $500 USD in bids?
|
|
|
|
|
Congrats on getting them released! I have been waiting for this post for some time now. Mainly because I heard a rumour that you would be charging ~$40 per miner.
The pricing is the biggest disappointment for myself personally.
At 1.99 BTC, and a conservative estimate of 20M difficulty over the next year, it will take me 352 days to recoup the 1.99 BTC cost.
It difficulty averages 40M during that time, it will take two years to recoup your investment.
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't their first Mars miner technically an FPGA?
And why does their 250GH/s miner need to be water cooled? I thought ASIC chips were cool to begin with?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm curious... why does their 250GH/s version custom made ASIC need to be water cooled?
I was under the impression that ASIC chips were near perfect in their efficiency and gave off next to no heat.
|
|
|
|
Are you involved with ZeroCoin directly? Just to be clear, ZeroCoin is not going to be implemented in Bitcoin in its current form - it's just too inefficient right now. Don't get me wrong, it's a great idea and some great crypto, but it's a proof-of-concept and they still have a lot more work to do in making it efficient enough to be practical. It could easily be years before it can become a part of Bitcoin proper, if ever. Creating a sub-reddit now is premature and just makes ZeroCoin look like vaporware to the general public. It's never to early to start a conversation. |
|
|
|
|
Glad to hear it, Khal.
Say, show your face around r/namecoin once in a while! The readers would sure appreciate it!
|
|
|
|
I've installed namecoind, created a bitcoin.conf with user and pwd, started the daemon which downloaded all blocks, then retrieved my address and entered it into the mining.bitcoin.cz account.
Is there anything else I must do to start the namecoin mining?
What is the username and password for?
Apparently slush's pool no longer supports merged mining according to "fourd00rgtz"? See this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg1764838#msg1764838Try this pool for stratum based merged mining: http://mmpool.bitparking.com/poolAt namecoin's current difficulty level (seen here: http://dot-bit.org/tools/nextDifficulty.php ) it is going to be a long time until you mine a namecoin block going it alone unless you have an ASIC handy. |
|
|
|
Are we under attack??
No. Bitcoin crashed so some miners switched to more promising currency. I've asked this before but no one responded if it's an exact copy of bitcoin how is it more promising? It is an exact copy of bitcoin. The only thing I can think of that makes bytecoin "more promising" is the lack of 2 or 3 early adopters hoarding ~8% of the total coins that will ever exist. |
|
|
|
|
Yea, I really dislike the idea of a "foundation" in both this currency and devcoin (I think? If I'm understanding it right that is...)
Who's to say the foundation doesn't just cashout all of their freicoins into another currency?
|
|
|
|
On VirCurPool, I'm putting out 1.8 MH/s via CGMiner - but VirCurPool web interface only reports I'm putting out 113 KH/s? Any idea why?
That would be because mincoin is a scrypt based hash coin and not sha-256 based, so you will see much "slower" hashing going on when using scrypt. |
|
|
|
I can't build the file after running the following code: make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=- USE_IPV6=0 USE_QRCODE=0 BDB_INCLUDE_PATH='/usr/include/db4.8' Here is my compilation log: g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DUSE_IPV6 -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src/obj -I/usr/include/db4.8 -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/checkpoints.d -o obj/checkpoints.o checkpoints.cpp
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DUSE_IPV6 -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src/obj -I/usr/include/db4.8 -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/netbase.d -o obj/netbase.o netbase.cpp
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DUSE_IPV6 -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src/obj -I/usr/include/db4.8 -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/addrman.d -o obj/addrman.o addrman.cpp
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DUSE_IPV6 -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src/obj -I/usr/include/db4.8 -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/crypter.d -o obj/crypter.o crypter.cpp
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DUSE_IPV6 -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src/obj -I/usr/include/db4.8 -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/key.d -o obj/key.o key.cpp
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DUSE_IPV6 -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src/obj -I/usr/include/db4.8 -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/db.d -o obj/db.o db.cpp
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DUSE_IPV6 -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src/obj -I/usr/include/db4.8 -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/init.d -o obj/init.o init.cpp
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DUSE_IPV6 -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src/obj -I/usr/include/db4.8 -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/irc.d -o obj/irc.o irc.cpp
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DUSE_IPV6 -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src/obj -I/usr/include/db4.8 -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/keystore.d -o obj/keystore.o keystore.cpp
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DUSE_IPV6 -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src/obj -I/usr/include/db4.8 -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/main.d -o obj/main.o main.cpp
main.cpp: In function âbool Reorganize(CTxDB&, CBlockIndex*)â:
main.cpp:1458:42: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
main.cpp: At global scope:
main.cpp:3316:21: warning: âunsigned int ScanHash_CryptoPP(char*, char*, char*, char*, unsigned int&)â defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DUSE_IPV6 -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src/obj -I/usr/include/db4.8 -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/net.d -o obj/net.o net.cpp
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DUSE_IPV6 -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src/obj -I/usr/include/db4.8 -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/protocol.d -o obj/protocol.o protocol.cpp
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DUSE_IPV6 -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src -I/home/mincoinuser/mincoin/src/obj -I/usr/include/db4.8 -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/bitcoinrpc.d -o obj/bitcoinrpc.o bitcoinrpc.cpp
bitcoinrpc.cpp: In function âjson_spirit::Value listtxfromblock(const Array&, bool)â:
bitcoinrpc.cpp:1588:51: error: conversion from âlong long intâ to âconst Value_type {aka const json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char> > >}â is ambiguous
bitcoinrpc.cpp:1588:51: note: candidates are:
In file included from json/json_spirit_reader_template.h:9:0,
from bitcoinrpc.h:14,
from bitcoinrpc.cpp:15:
json/json_spirit_value.h:283:5: note: json_spirit::Value_impl<Config>::Value_impl(double) [with Config = json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char> >]
json/json_spirit_value.h:275:5: note: json_spirit::Value_impl<Config>::Value_impl(uint64_t) [with Config = json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char> >; uint64_t = long unsigned int]
json/json_spirit_value.h:267:5: note: json_spirit::Value_impl<Config>::Value_impl(int64_t) [with Config = json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char> >; int64_t = long int]
json/json_spirit_value.h:259:5: note: json_spirit::Value_impl<Config>::Value_impl(int) [with Config = json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char> >]
json/json_spirit_value.h:251:5: note: json_spirit::Value_impl<Config>::Value_impl(bool) [with Config = json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char> >]
json/json_spirit_value.h:219:5: note: json_spirit::Value_impl<Config>::Value_impl(json_spirit::Value_impl<Config>::Const_str_ptr) [with Config = json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char> >; json_spirit::Value_impl<Config>::Const_str_ptr = const char*] <near match>
json/json_spirit_value.h:219:5: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from âlong long intâ to âjson_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char> > >::Const_str_ptr {aka const char*}â
json/json_spirit_value.h:439:5: error: initializing argument 2 of âjson_spirit::Pair_impl<Config>::Pair_impl(const String_type&, const Value_type&) [with Config = json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char> >; json_spirit::Pair_impl<Config>::String_type = std::basic_string<char>; json_spirit::Pair_impl<Config>::Value_type = json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char> > >]â
bitcoinrpc.cpp:1556:18: warning: unused variable âpindexâ [-Wunused-variable]
bitcoinrpc.cpp:1557:9: warning: unused variable âtarget_confirmsâ [-Wunused-variable]
make: *** [obj/bitcoinrpc.o] Error 1 Any ideas? |
|
|
|
Why is the bbqcoin github talking about litecoins? https://github.com/Cubox-/BBQCoin/tree/master/docIs https://github.com/Cubox-/BBQCoin/ the official bbqcoin tree? I have only 3 connections at the moment and 86424 blocks downloaded, but the difficulty is at 0.00006395? How is this possible? Is bbqcoin a scrypt based coin, which was forked from litecoin? EDIT: I am now at 0 connections about 1 hour later. Does anybody know the default port for bbqcoin? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
