Why would it be a good idea to trust the "proof" of revenue when they are lying about other aspects of their site? Even if you can independently verify their revenue numbers, that doesn't mean that the revenue is not from their own gambling, and being dishonest about one thing is an indication they are going to be dishonest about other things as well.
To think otherwise is like believing someone who has a history of scamming when they say they aren't going to steal from you if you trust them with your money again.
I am surprised as to how many naive people are defending DaDice, and am surprised how much dust signature earning have such an influence on people.
[/quote]
Even if you can independently verify their revenue numbers, that doesn't mean that the revenue is not from their own gambling
Will you trust that if they prove funds solvency ? I guess not. And tell me how will you verify the revenue because admin can always gamble as mentioned by you, and on that basis no site should auction their site ?
and being dishonest about one thing is an indication they are going to be dishonest about other things as well.
They were not proved dishonest yet, if
you ok I don't show
your my balls does't mean you don't have buddy. So yes you can say they had not proved but at the same side you can't all them scammer on that basis.
Yes if a member can prove they failed to process a withdrawal I will be happy to cal them scammer.
Show Posts
, i never knew posting more will get me into trouble
