 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
Once they attend to my needs I have no issues. It just trying to find a time when they are not covered up and can attend to my request/issue.
Like I said once they have time to fix my issue after that everything works great. The only thing I wish was different would be that they make sure to send a bill for the current month on a guaranteed day of the month rather than waiting up to 3 months before sending out invoices.
|
|
|
|
Hi everyone, I just updated the initial post with our zendesk information for support services. We are now working to catch up our backlog of installations. If I haven't contacted you already, please contact us via support@segmining.zendesk.com for your support needs. I have been sending emails to the Zendesk email address about a problem I have accessing the vpn.seg.cx:943 VPN and I have not received any responses other than the automated response that my initial email was received. And since I cannot access that VPN I cannot reboot one of my miners that has been 100% down since early this morning. Thank you, justatadbitminecrazy |
|
|
|
|
Okay I have done that, now I'll watch it to see how it goes.
Why run Armory Offline if running Bitcoin-QT.exe manually?
|
|
|
|
|
My Armory app was re-syncing up the Bitcoin Core DB for almost 3 days then I had to reboot the Windows 10 PC so I had to Exit the Armory app and then reboot. Now when I start Armory it minimizes to the Task Bar and will not launch the GUI when I double click on it, also it isn't loading the Bitcoin Core app. Here is what I found in the armorylog.txt file.
2017-06-22 11:09 (INFO) -- ArmoryUtils.pyc:600 - Executing popen: ['.\\guardian.exe', '6852', '0']
2017-06-22 11:09 (ERROR) -- ArmoryUtils.pyc:3164 - Error in pybkgdthread: [Error 6] The handle is invalid
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "armoryengine\ArmoryUtils.pyc", line 3162, in run
File "armoryengine\ArmoryUtils.pyc", line 3099, in funcPartial
File "SDM.pyc", line 624, in pollBitcoindState
File "SDM.pyc", line 788, in getSDMStateLogic
File "SDM.pyc", line 925, in getTopBlockInfo
File "SDM.pyc", line 722, in isRunningBitcoind
File "subprocess_win.pyc", line 854, in poll
File "subprocess_win.pyc", line 1029, in _internal_poll
WindowsError: [Error 6] The handle is invalid
2017-06-22 11:09 (INFO) -- ArmoryQt.py:1514 - setupUriRegistration
2017-06-22 11:09 (INFO) -- ArmoryQt.py:1582 - Armory already registered for current user. Done!
2017-06-22 11:09 (INFO) -- ArmoryQt.py:664 - Usermode: Standard
2017-06-22 11:09 (INFO) -- ArmoryQt.py:1810 - Changing usermode:
2017-06-22 11:09 (INFO) -- ArmoryQt.py:1811 - From: Standard
2017-06-22 11:09 (INFO) -- ArmoryQt.py:1819 - To: Standard
2017-06-22 11:09 (ERROR) -- Traceback (most recent call last):
File "ArmoryQt.py", line 7147, in <module>
File "ArmoryQt.py", line 822, in __init__
File "ArmoryQt.py", line 5655, in setDashboardDetails
File "SDM.pyc", line 752, in getSDMState
File "SDM.pyc", line 788, in getSDMStateLogic
File "SDM.pyc", line 925, in getTopBlockInfo
File "SDM.pyc", line 722, in isRunningBitcoind
File "subprocess_win.pyc", line 854, in poll
File "subprocess_win.pyc", line 1029, in _internal_poll
WindowsError: [Error 6] The handle is invalid
|
|
|
|
|
Done and again thank you.
I will do the upgrade tomorrow.
Have a good day.
|
|
|
|
If it matters I have my mining payout set to 0.01 BTC.
Is there any way to compress the small transactions into one bigger transaction?
No. The only way to do that is to create a transaction which spends all of your small transactions into one large output. If you aren't going to spend your Bitcoin in the near future, you can make such a transaction and just pay a very low transaction fee (and enable RBF just in case so that you can bump the fee if you have to). It will take a while to confirm, but you won't be paying as much in transaction fees. Also I should change my reward payout to at least 0.05 or higher to lower the number of future transactions? |
|
|
|
|
Okay I see my mistake. I was expecting test build 3 to be a sub of 0.96.1 but instead it is 0.96.03.
Thank you, I'll give this a try tomorrow once the database rebuild finishes.
|
|
|
|
|
I installed 95.1 after I got the high fee of $155 for one transaction. When I tried to do the exact same amount the transaction fee was in the neighborhood of $5.00 but when I tried to send it my Armory wallet (ArmoryDB) crashed and it would not send the BTC. After many iterations of installing, re-installing, and completely uninstalling and then deleting all directories in Program Files, Program Files (x86), and under AppData\Roaming I could not get it to work so I failed back to a clean install of Armory 93.3 and Bitcoin Core 11.1 which I know works. I am currently waiting for the Bitcoin DB to completely re-sync all DB files. After I get that completely working 100% again I will need to perform an upgrade to one of the newer releases.
Which Armory and Bitcoin Core would you suggest to upgrade to that are not in Beta?
|
|
|
|
|
If it matters I have my mining payout set to 0.01 BTC.
Is there any way to compress the small transactions into one bigger transaction?
|
|
|
|
|
Please keep in mind that I am between Novice and somewhat knowledgeable with regards to BTC chains so please don't laugh when I ask the following.
What are inputs?
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the info.
One more quick question. Can you point me to a forum that covers Armory too high transaction fees? I tried to send $5.00 this morning and Armory want to send a $97.00 transaction fee.
|
|
|
|
|
I installed it and the console window no longer shows on the task bar, thank you.
So if I understand the new configuration of Armory is that Bitcoin Core is no longer used or needed, it has been replaced by ArmoryDB.exe? Does that mean I can uninstall the Bitcoin Core app?
|
|
|
|
|
I had to upgrade my Armory to fix a fee issue so I installed "Version 0.96-beta-a3d01aa722" and it loads ArmoryDB.exe in a console window. I am running Windows 10 and need or would like to hide that console window so I don't accidentally close when I am closing down my work windows.
Any way I can run it as a hidden service?
If not when will there be a release available that hides the console window? I notice that the timestamp for your reply was 1/2017, I would think that 5 months might be enough time to release a version that hides the window.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I am wondering if it's possible to use antminer S3 plugged with ethernet to my laptop which is on wifi ?
Any idea how to configure it this way ? because for some physical reason I can't plug it directly to my router.
Thx !!
Yes look up window's connection sharing. But you should be able to use it with your router. If you are having trouble with network maybe post screenshot of network page on S3 and tell us your network info. Or use DHCP and it will set it for you, and find it connected to your router. I would dive more into the networking issue then trying to use a laptop 24x7 just for networking. If you mean you only have wifi you can get networking adapters that take wifi and provide a lan cable connection. Ok I tried something else. I made a antenna from old wireless device I had. I connected the S3 to my PC via ethernet, I had to change my my laptop PC adresse to 192.168.0.X to 192.168.1.X to access the S3 because my router is 192.168.0.1 After doing that I changed the LAN Ip adress of the S3 to 192.168.0.101 to make it accessible via my laptop without changing my ip address all the time. I setup the wifi connection which worked the S3 is connected to the network. Then I tried to setup the wwan interface, both with DHCP or static address and I just cannot access the S3 after deconnecting the ethernet cable from it. I even see the device in my router DHCP list addresses but it remains unaccessable and doesnt hash... And I changed back my laptop IP address to DHCP Any tips here ? I see 2 options either static or dchp. If you show us the network screen on your S3 we can try to help say what settings need changed. With this we can try the static route. But without seeing it it with your router would be something like following: Static IP Address: 192.168.0.X (enter an IP that is not being used on X) Netmask: 255.255.255.0 Gateway: 192.168.0.1 DNS Server: 8.8.8.8 (The above assumes some guesses based on what you have said but it will be something like that) Other option is turn S3 to DHCP and it should configure it on its own. Just see devices after. You might need to set a DNS I personally use google normally very easy to remember 8.8.8.8 . Either one should work. I am having the same problem and I am suspecting that I may have asymmetrical routing happening. Can someone post the output from an example network file that has the wireless interface configured as the only working accessible interface for both management and pool work connection? |
|
|
|
|
