Show Posts
|
Pages: [1]
|
yet we are making efforts to credit them out of pocket for free and you are making demands as to when it must be immediately paid?
Please show me any other site willing to do the same.
you might want to come off that high horse. the only reason you even offered that was to calm down investors after it was revealed that you were negligent with server access with an unstable ex-developer still having server seed access. in the following six months not only have you not compensated investors as promised, and not even released amounts to your investors. most likely because your insolvent if you take into account your debt to investors
|
|
|
Thanks, got my money back ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
What the hell?!!!!! So you just cleared my balance (I deposited, but haven't withdrawn)? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FEiLvORu.png&t=663&c=x8zkCdGU3PTmuA) am I going to get my money back?
|
|
|
• The owners are Co-Location owners. Don’t kid yourself, Adding additional processing CPU, Ram, HDD and bandwidth speed is as easy as pushing a button. We have server cabinets full of enterprise servers just sitting and waiting for FastDice.com journey to grow. All for the user experience.
• Security. This also expands to the security within FastDice.com, we are bulletproof and full reporting is being maintained and watched 24/7. Mega Companies already trust our Co-Location so what do you think we put in our own projects. 2 factor authentication is also ready for launch so scammers, There is nothing for you here.
Emphasis mine. So I had a look, and you're using a combination of namecheap shared hosting and Amazon's elasticbeanstalk. If you're going to post bullshit, you should at least post unverifiable bullshit.
|
|
|
Removing the chat was a great idea as it was always inactive which makes the site look worse than nothing and the history full of idiots people who didn't know how to verify bets and investors being rude to them. If people have a concern its better that you can properly explain to them in private. Now i might play here instead of satoshidice )
|
|
|
It has taken him over 2 months to dig up an estimated 34% of the wallet he is working through. The rate of digging has slowed during that time. At the current pace the digging could continue for another year. And then he could start on another wallet.
I don't see the price recovering any time soon, but doing anything to address the issue seems to be unpopular so it looks like we're stuck with things how they are.
The digger has enough and it is time to switch to stake-only ) I think the best solution is for you to update your staking copy of clam to not mine dig transactions and reject blocks with dig transactions if it is the current best block. If it is the second-best and has dig-transactions, it becomes your local best block. This removes the possibility of prolonged fork, while applying pressure for people to also not accept dig transactions. Most importantly this can be done without modifying upstream or getting into committee driven consensus. I originally believe in clam because i was told the initial distribution was fair, the fairest you said. But if the only point of clam is to now make a digger rich and get tokens to play on just-dice then count me out.
|
|
|
And you feel that it is honest and not misleading to promote as your "zero-house edge, peer-to-peer game"? Serious question )
|
|
|
Do not play on ralobotThere are three giant red flags: - Their provably fair system is completely vulnerable. A miner has complete control of what timestamp it uses and routinely generates fake ones, as the nonce is not big enough. They a miner just needs to only pick timestamps that would make them win, and not propagate the transactions. Or alternatively this vulnerability against players if ralobot control hash power by only putting losing transactions in a block. Both of these cost nothing to do.
- They use a self-moderated thread, like other scammy sites like gawminer, pocketrocketcasino and fortunejack to hide what customers are really saying
- Running with 0 house edge is not viable unless your plants involve some sort of scamming. No one is going to expose themselves to unlimited risk for no return. Right now they have a negative house edge, which means they have unlimited risk and are playing players to pay. Either idiots or incompetence
Conclusion is that it must be avoided at all costs.
|
|
|
Becareful with this, cryptonavigator is famous for spam articles. This one isn't about clam either, but "Заработок Bitcoin" or roughly "How to make bitcoin" and doesn't promote or talk about clam but encourages people to just sell it for bitcoins on some rip off service.
|
|
|
I've decided to leave negative trust and hope others do too. Not because I believe FortuneJack are outright scammers but because NLNico's evidence is extremely damning (especially the almost exactly +100M dash, and +200M ltc from expected) and this is an extremely dishonest thing to do when people use site statistics as a form of social proof.
This is something that people should be aware of before they play here.
Even if they do "fix" the stats to more plausible levels, it'll be hard to trust statistics of someone who thought it was a good idea to put 14M bitcoin wagered proudly on their homepage.
|
|
|
The best is bitdice.me, I have some money there that has close to doubled. Or the most risky and most porfitable is still just-dice, I'm almost up x5 in bitcoin value from the 100 clams I bought, but if JD shuts down the value of clam will be 0. Another option is MoneyPot which allows you to invest in BetterBets an other sites, but the returns are likely not really worth the risk (I'm only now finally up 5%, after 2 months of loss). For sites like: Win88, PocketRocketCasino, DaDice, PeerBet don't listen to the owners and do your own research but I'm sure they're all either scams in the making or when they shut down they'll take everyones money with them. DiceNow I think is also legitimate but has no volume so pointless to invest in
|
|
|
How stupid does DaDice think people are? What's more likely? DaDice sold the site for 300 BTC, but can't afford to honor the promotion done on their watch and that the new owner bought the site for 300 BTC and his first act is to screw the players for the promotional money or They are faking a sale to create new bitcointalk accounts without the red negative reputation and weasel their way out of their obligations. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
What about nightly backups? The server seed was the same for days, so it should be contained in them. Or were they accidentally deleted as well?
|
|
|
I guess the conclusion of this thread is that the server seed that unibtc was playing with was lost, which means it was either done intentionally to hide the fact some of his rolls were rigged to win back the money ... or done as a silly mistake.
In reality it is quite easy to tell magicdice please generate a chart of the player profits during the time before the server seedIf the end of the chart shows the player winning money then magicdice obviously wasn't cheating but would explain why magicdice was scared the player was cheating and justifies them changing the server seed incorrectly If the end of the chart shows the player losing money then magicdice cheated the player with fake rolls and covered their tracks by losing the server seed. They would have had no reason to be scared the player was cheating and need to change the server seed
|
|
|
Done, I've replied to you.
Thanks! Top seller, would buy again
|
|
|
I'm buying multiple aged (at least 4 months) reddit accounts that have a post history (at least 750 combined karma)
Accounts must not be stolen, and allow me to reset the email address and password.
Please post here or via PM all offers. If the account has an exceptional post history, please PM me the account username for review.
I will not send the money first, so please don't waste my time with attempted scams. I will happily however use escrow, most preferably a multi-sig solution (e.g. https://coinb.in/#newMultiSig 2-out-of-2, or 2-out-3 with the third signature being a trusted third party).
All bought out, thanks everyone for the PMs
|
|
|
Our Stats Total Mixed Bitcoins: 88.403699 BTC Total Participants: 350
Since when do you guys started this mixing service? Are the stats on your site faked or have you been mixing bitcoins for long? I cannot see any traces of your service anywhere in the web so I'm a bit skeptical about the coins your site states that you've already mixed. I don't believe in your service's stats. hahahhahahaha. If that wasn't damning enough: Our Stats Total Mixed Bitcoins: 53.549068 BTC Total Participants: 248
Guess they unmixed some coins!
|
|
|
Aura, could you please check my PM? I will post here if or when my issue is resolved
|
|
|
|